Literature DB >> 20950695

Does measurement of the anatomic axis consistently predict hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) for knee alignment studies in osteoarthritis? Analysis of long limb radiographs from the multicenter osteoarthritis (MOST) study.

L Sheehy1, D Felson, Y Zhang, J Niu, Y-M Lam, N Segal, J Lynch, T D V Cooke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Researchers commonly use the femoral shaft-tibial shaft angle (FS-TS) from knee radiographs to estimate the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) in studies examining risk factors for knee osteoarthritis (OA) incidence and progression. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between HKA and FS-TS, depending on the method of calculating FS-TS and the direction and degree of knee deformity.
METHODS: 120 full-length digital radiographs were assigned, with 30 in each of four alignment groups (0.0°-4.9°, and ≥5.0° of varus and valgus), from a large cohort of persons with and at risk of knee OA. HKA and five measures of FS-TS (using progressively shorter shaft lengths) were obtained using Horizons Analysis Software, Orthopaedic Alignment & Imaging Systems Inc. (OAISYS). The offsets between HKA and the different versions of FS-TS were calculated, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Pearson correlations were calculated.
RESULTS: In varus limbs use of a shorter shaft length increased the offset between HKA and FS-TS from 5.1° to 7.0°. The opposite occurred with valgus limbs (from 5.0° to 3.7°). Correlations between HKA and FS-TS for the whole sample of 120 individuals were excellent (r range 1.00-0.88). However, correlations for individual alignment groups were low to moderate, especially for the shortest-shaft FS-TS (r range 0.41-0.66).
CONCLUSIONS: The offsets obtained using the shorter FS-TS measurements vary depending on direction and degree of knee deformity, and therefore may not provide reliable predictions for HKA We recommend that full-length radiographs be used whenever an accurate estimation of HKA is required, although broad categories of alignment can be estimated with FS-TS.
Copyright © 2010 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20950695      PMCID: PMC3038654          DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  22 in total

1.  Is there an alternative to the full-leg radiograph for determining knee joint alignment in osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Rana S Hinman; Rachel L May; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-04-15

2.  Coronal bowing of the femur and tibia in Chinese: its incidence and effects on total knee arthroplasty planning.

Authors:  W P Yau; K Y Chiu; W M Tang; T P Ng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.118

3.  A quantitative approach to radiography of the lower limb. Principles and applications.

Authors:  T D Cooke; R A Scudamore; J T Bryant; C Sorbie; D Siu; B Fisher
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

4.  Axial lower-limb alignment: comparison of knee geometry in normal volunteers and osteoarthritis patients.

Authors:  D Cooke; A Scudamore; J Li; U Wyss; T Bryant; P Costigan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee.

Authors:  R W Hsu; S Himeno; M B Coventry; E Y Chao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity.

Authors:  J R Moreland; L W Bassett; G J Hanker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Radiographic assessment of bony contributions to knee deformity.

Authors:  T D Cooke; J Li; R A Scudamore
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  A comparative assessment of alignment angle of the knee by radiographic and physical examination methods.

Authors:  Virginia B Kraus; T Parker Vail; Ted Worrell; Gary McDaniel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-06

9.  Association between valgus and varus alignment and the development and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  G M Brouwer; A W van Tol; A P Bergink; J N Belo; R M D Bernsen; M Reijman; H A P Pols; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-04

10.  Longitudinal study of the relationship between knee angle and tibiofemoral cartilage volume in subjects with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  F Cicuttini; A Wluka; J Hankin; Y Wang
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2004-01-06       Impact factor: 7.580

View more
  31 in total

1.  Assessing Lower Limb Alignment: Comparison of Standard Knee Xray vs Long Leg View.

Authors:  Biagio Zampogna; Sebastiano Vasta; Annunziato Amendola; Bastian Uribe-Echevarria Marbach; Yubo Gao; Rocco Papalia; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

2.  The incident tibiofemoral osteoarthritis with rapid progression phenotype: development and validation of a prognostic prediction rule.

Authors:  D L Riddle; P W Stratford; R A Perera
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  Correlation of knee and hindfoot deformities in advanced knee OA: compensatory hindfoot alignment and where it occurs.

Authors:  Adam A Norton; John J Callaghan; Annunziato Amendola; Phinit Phisitkul; Siwadol Wongsak; Steve S Liu; Catherine Fruehling-Wall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A novel 3D approach for determination of frontal and coronal plane tibial slopes from MR imaging.

Authors:  Amirhesam Amerinatanzi; Rodney Summers; Kaveh Ahmadi; Vijay K Goel; Timothy E Hewett; Edward Nyman
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2016-12-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Three-dimensional reconstruction method for measuring the knee valgus angle of the femur in northern Chinese adults.

Authors:  Tong Liu; Chen-yu Wang; Jian-lin Xiao; Lan-yu Zhu; Xue-zhou Li; Yan-guo Qin; Zhong-li Gao
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.066

6.  [Should we use hip-ankle radiographs to assess the coronal alignment after total knee arthroplasty?].

Authors:  J Dargel; L Pennig; C Schnurr; C K Boese; P Eysel; J Oppermann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Polyethylene Damage Increases With Varus Implant Alignment in Posterior-stabilized and Constrained Condylar Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zhichang Li; Christina I Esposito; Chelsea N Koch; Yuo-Yu Lee; Douglas E Padgett; Timothy M Wright
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Validity of clinical measures of frontal plane knee alignment: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2012-06-07

9.  Comparison of Double and Single Leg Weight-Bearing Radiography in Determining Knee Alignment.

Authors:  Omid Yazdanpanah; Mahmood Karimi Mobarakeh; Masoud Nakhaei; Mohammad R Baneshi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-05

10.  Automated Analysis of Alignment in Long-Leg Radiographs by Using a Fully Automated Support System Based on Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Justus Schock; Daniel Truhn; Daniel B Abrar; Dorit Merhof; Stefan Conrad; Manuel Post; Felix Mittelstrass; Christiane Kuhl; Sven Nebelung
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-12-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.