Literature DB >> 35107853

Can THEM6 targeting stop resistance to prostate cancer treatment?

Mrittika Chattopadhyay1, Doris Germain1.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) clinical management relies heavily on androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). However, despite experiencing initial clinical benefit, patients getting ADT for non-resectable PCa eventually relapse and develop fatal castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). Multiple mechanisms of acquired resistance to treatment have been reported, including metabolic adaptation (Marine et al, 2020). Notably, activation of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) unfolded protein response (UPR) has been associated with oncogenic transformation (Hart et al, 2012), tumor progression, metastasis dissemination, and resistance to therapy (Chen & Cubillos-Ruiz, 2021). Targeting different branches of ER UPR has been found to be an effective tool against aggressive PCa (Nguyen et al, 2018; Sheng et al, 2019). Therefore, a better understanding of these pathways may lead to the identification of novel drug targets.
© 2022 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35107853      PMCID: PMC8899918          DOI: 10.15252/emmm.202115504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Mol Med        ISSN: 1757-4676            Impact factor:   12.137


As the ER is the primary site for lipid and cholesterol biosynthesis, any change in lipid homeostasis can also induce ER stress and lead to subsequent activation of UPR. In this issue of EMBO Mol. Med., the study by Blomme et al (2022) compared different in vivo models of ADT and identified thioesterase superfamily member 6 (THEM6) as a potentially clinically relevant protein overexpressed in CRPC. THEM (thioesterase superfamily member) are type II acyl‐CoA thioesterases (ACOTs) which are engaged in deactivation of fatty acyl‐CoA thioesters, generation of free fatty acids and CoA, regulation of intracellular fatty acid (FA) trafficking, and are an integral part of ER lipid homeostasis (Tillander et al, 2017). However, the role of THEM6 in resistance to ADT had not been explored previously (Fig 1).
Figure 1

THEM‐6 in PCa cells is responsible for developing resistance to ADT by activating ER UPR and maintaining sterol biosynthesis.

THEM‐6 in PCa cells is responsible for developing resistance to ADT by activating ER UPR and maintaining sterol biosynthesis. In their study, Blomme et al (2022) show that THEM6 plays a critical role in ADT resistance by triggering ER stress response through preservation of ER membrane integrity, sterol biosynthesis, and ATF4 activation. To investigate the role of THEM6 in ADT resistance, the authors compared in vivo hormone naïve (HN) and castration‐resistant (CRPC) orthograft models of PCa by proteomics and found that THEM6 was significantly elevated in CRPC tumors. They further confirmed their observations in vitro in several PCa cell lines. To further explore the role of THEM6 in CRPC, the authors generated stable CRISPR‐based THEM6 knockout PCa cell lines (THEM6 KO). In a xenograft model, THEM6 KO significantly reduced tumor volume and increased tumor sensitivity to ADT. Previously, the authors had shown that ADT resistance was associated with rewiring of lipid metabolism (Blomme et al, 2020), and hence, they hypothesized that THEM6 was involved in the maintenance of tumor lipidome. Indeed, they found that loss of THEM6 in PCa cell lines resulted in a significant decrease in the intracellular levels of multiple triglyceride (TG) and ether lipid species and increased amounts of ceramides. They further confirmed in vivo by Raman spectroscopy that THEM6‐deficient tumors exhibited significantly less lipids and cholesterol. Further proteomics analysis of THEM6‐depleted prostate cancer cells revealed a significant downregulation of a large cluster of ER‐related membrane proteins. Electron microscopy analyses confirmed the morphological deformity of ER in THEM6‐deficient cells. As THEM6 is localized in the ER and plays an important role in maintaining lipid homeostasis, the authors hypothesized that it may also impact protein homeostasis. They performed pull‐down experiments in THEM6 overexpressing HEK293 cells, followed by MS analysis. Among the 152 proteins identified to interact with THEM6, several were involved in protein transport (exportins, importins, transportins, components of the ERAD machinery and the OST complex). The authors demonstrated that silencing THEM6 in PCa cell lines suppressed the expression of ER membrane‐associated chaperone calnexin without affecting its soluble homolog calrecticulin. These findings suggest that THEM6 is an ER protein and an important regulator of ER membrane integrity and trafficking. Since cholesterol acts as a precursor for de novo androgen synthesis and is required to sustain ADT resistance, a role of THEM6 in this process was investigated. The authors validated that loss of THEM6 reduced sterol and fatty acid synthesis in PCa cells. Using prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) TCGA dataset, the authors were able to establish a correlation between THEM6 and expression of several enzymes involved in the late steps of sterol biosynthesis. This analysis further revealed that fatty acid synthesis regulatory enzymes, acetyl‐CoA carboxylase and fatty acid synthase, were upregulated in THEM6‐enriched patient tumors. Collectively, these observations support the importance of THEM6 in regulation of ER protein and lipid homeostasis. Disruptions of ER homeostasis in turn activate ER UPR to quickly relieve ER stress. THEM6 was essential for the initiation of ER UPR since THEM6‐deficient PCa cells were unable to activate ATF4/CHOP pathway. Further, THEM6‐deficient PCa cells were unable to activate UPR in response to palmitate‐induced ER stress, but initiated the UPR in response to hexadecylglycerol treatment, which is a precursor of ether lipid synthesis. This finding is of particular significance as it places THEM6 not only at the center of ether lipid metabolism but also as an important regulator of lipid‐mediated stress response. However, the exact molecular mechanism behind THEM6‐mediated activation of ATF4/CHOP pathway remains largely unclear. The authors validated their findings in PCa patients and found a significant correlation between high THEM6 expression and shortened progression‐free and recurrence‐free survival in both the PRAD TCGA and the MSKCC (Taylor et al, 2010) cohorts. Further, UPR‐related genes were positively enriched in high THEM6 tumors, as well as in high THEM6 PCa patients. In conclusion, the study by Blomme et al uncovered a novel role of THEM6 overexpression in ADT via its ability to promote persistent activation of ER UPR, which in turn facilitates PCa cells to survive therapy‐induced ER stress. Their findings establish THEM6 as a novel pharmacological target for cancer treatment.
  10 in total

1.  2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase regulates lipid homeostasis in treatment-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Arnaud Blomme; Catriona A Ford; Ernest Mui; Rachana Patel; Chara Ntala; Lauren E Jamieson; Mélanie Planque; Grace H McGregor; Paul Peixoto; Eric Hervouet; Colin Nixon; Mark Salji; Luke Gaughan; Elke Markert; Peter Repiscak; David Sumpton; Giovanny Rodriguez Blanco; Sergio Lilla; Jurre J Kamphorst; Duncan Graham; Karen Faulds; Gillian M MacKay; Sarah-Maria Fendt; Sara Zanivan; Hing Y Leung
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Integrative genomic profiling of human prostate cancer.

Authors:  Barry S Taylor; Nikolaus Schultz; Haley Hieronymus; Anuradha Gopalan; Yonghong Xiao; Brett S Carver; Vivek K Arora; Poorvi Kaushik; Ethan Cerami; Boris Reva; Yevgeniy Antipin; Nicholas Mitsiades; Thomas Landers; Igor Dolgalev; John E Major; Manda Wilson; Nicholas D Socci; Alex E Lash; Adriana Heguy; James A Eastham; Howard I Scher; Victor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino; Chris Sander; Charles L Sawyers; William L Gerald
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 31.743

3.  ER stress-mediated autophagy promotes Myc-dependent transformation and tumor growth.

Authors:  Lori S Hart; John T Cunningham; Tatini Datta; Souvik Dey; Feven Tameire; Stacey L Lehman; Bo Qiu; Haiyan Zhang; George Cerniglia; Meixia Bi; Yan Li; Yan Gao; Huayi Liu; Changhong Li; Amit Maity; Andrei Thomas-Tikhonenko; Alexander E Perl; Albert Koong; Serge Y Fuchs; J Alan Diehl; Ian G Mills; Davide Ruggero; Constantinos Koumenis
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 4.  Non-genetic mechanisms of therapeutic resistance in cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Marine; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Mark A Dawson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  Deactivating Fatty Acids: Acyl-CoA Thioesterase-Mediated Control of Lipid Metabolism.

Authors:  Veronika Tillander; Stefan E H Alexson; David E Cohen
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 12.015

6.  THEM6-mediated reprogramming of lipid metabolism supports treatment resistance in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Arnaud Blomme; Coralie Peter; Ernest Mui; Giovanny Rodriguez Blanco; Ning An; Louise M Mason; Lauren E Jamieson; Grace H McGregor; Sergio Lilla; Chara Ntala; Rachana Patel; Marc Thiry; Sonia H Y Kung; Marine Leclercq; Catriona A Ford; Linda K Rushworth; David J McGarry; Susan Mason; Peter Repiscak; Colin Nixon; Mark J Salji; Elke Markert; Gillian M MacKay; Jurre J Kamphorst; Duncan Graham; Karen Faulds; Ladan Fazli; Martin E Gleave; Edward Avezov; Joanne Edwards; Huabing Yin; David Sumpton; Karen Blyth; Pierre Close; Daniel J Murphy; Sara Zanivan; Hing Y Leung
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 12.137

7.  Development of a stress response therapy targeting aggressive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hao G Nguyen; Crystal S Conn; Yae Kye; Lingru Xue; Craig M Forester; Janet E Cowan; Andrew C Hsieh; John T Cunningham; Charles Truillet; Feven Tameire; Michael J Evans; Christopher P Evans; Joy C Yang; Byron Hann; Constantinos Koumenis; Peter Walter; Peter R Carroll; Davide Ruggero
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  IRE1α-XBP1s pathway promotes prostate cancer by activating c-MYC signaling.

Authors:  Xia Sheng; Hatice Zeynep Nenseth; Su Qu; Omer F Kuzu; Turid Frahnow; Lukas Simon; Stephanie Greene; Qingping Zeng; Ladan Fazli; Paul S Rennie; Ian G Mills; Håvard Danielsen; Fabian Theis; John B Patterson; Yang Jin; Fahri Saatcioglu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Endoplasmic reticulum stress signals in the tumour and its microenvironment.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Juan R Cubillos-Ruiz
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Can THEM6 targeting stop resistance to prostate cancer treatment?

Authors:  Mrittika Chattopadhyay; Doris Germain
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 12.137

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Can THEM6 targeting stop resistance to prostate cancer treatment?

Authors:  Mrittika Chattopadhyay; Doris Germain
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 12.137

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.