Literature DB >> 35107601

Effectiveness of exercise training on cancer-related fatigue in colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Pedro Machado1,2,3, Miguel Morgado4, João Raposo4, Marco Mendes4, Cândida G Silva5,4,6, Nuno Morais5,7,4,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of exercise training on cancer-related fatigue (CRF) in colorectal cancer survivors.
METHODS: Randomized controlled trials published between 1 January 2010 and 19 October 2020, selected through online search conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus and PEDro databases, were included. Eligible trials compared the effect of exercise training interventions, versus non-exercise controls on CRF, in colorectal cancer survivors, during or after treatment. The methodological quality of individual studies was analysed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Standardized mean differences (SMD) that were pooled using random-effects models were included as the effect size. In addition, 95% prediction intervals (PI) were calculated.
RESULTS: Six trials involving 330 colorectal cancer patients met the inclusion criteria and presented reasonable to good methodological quality. An overall small-to-moderate effect of exercise training on CRF was found (SMD =  - 0.29: 95% CI: [- 0.53; - 0.06]; p = 0.01; PI: [- 0.63; 0.04]; low-quality evidence). Subgroup analysis revealed moderate effects of exercise interventions performed during chemotherapy (SMD =  - 0.63; 95% CI: [- 1.06; - 0.21]; p = 0.003) and small, non-significant effects, when exercise training was performed after cancer treatment (SMD =  - 0.14; 95% CI: [- 0.43; 0.14]; p = 0.32). Steady improvements were achieved when a combination of aerobic plus resistance exercise was used, in interventions lasting 12 to 24 weeks.
CONCLUSION: Exercise training could be regarded as a supportive therapy for the clinical management of CRF in colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, but further studies are necessary to clarify the effects of exercise interventions on CRF after cancer treatment.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Exercise training; Fatigue; Oncology; Physical activity; Rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35107601     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06856-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  48 in total

1.  Cancer-related fatigue: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  A Fabi; R Bhargava; S Fatigoni; M Guglielmo; M Horneber; F Roila; J Weis; K Jordan; C I Ripamonti
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Progress in colorectal cancer survival in Europe from the late 1980s to the early 21st century: the EUROCARE study.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Anne Marie Bouvier; Roberto Foschi; Monika Hackl; Inger Kristin Larsen; Valery Lemmens; Lucia Mangone; Silvia Francisci
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Jacques Ferlay; Rebecca L Siegel; Mathieu Laversanne; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 4.  Measuring outcomes in oncology treatment: the importance of patient-centered outcomes.

Authors:  Aundrea Oliver; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Fatigue in people with localized colorectal cancer who do and do not receive chemotherapy: a longitudinal prospective study.

Authors:  J L Vardy; H M Dhillon; G R Pond; C Renton; A Dodd; H Zhang; S J Clarke; I F Tannock
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 6.  Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Amy P Abernethy; C Daniel Mullins; Bryce B Reeve; Mary Lou Smith; Stephen Joel Coons; Jeff Sloan; Keith Wenzel; Cynthia Chauhan; Wayland Eppard; Elizabeth S Frank; Joseph Lipscomb; Stephen A Raymond; Merianne Spencer; Sean Tunis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Recent major progress in long-term cancer patient survival disclosed by modeled period analysis.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Adam Gondos; Volker Arndt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Symptom prevalence in lung and colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Anne M Walling; Jane C Weeks; Katherine L Kahn; Diana Tisnado; Nancy L Keating; Sydney M Dy; Neeraj K Arora; Jennifer W Mack; Philip M Pantoja; Jennifer L Malin
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  An International Collaborative Standardizing a Comprehensive Patient-Centered Outcomes Measurement Set for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jessica A Zerillo; Maartje G Schouwenburg; Annelotte C M van Bommel; Caleb Stowell; Jacob Lippa; Donna Bauer; Ann M Berger; Gilles Boland; Josep M Borras; Mary K Buss; Robert Cima; Eric Van Cutsem; Eino B van Duyn; Samuel R G Finlayson; Skye Hung-Chun Cheng; Corinna Langelotz; John Lloyd; Andrew C Lynch; Harvey J Mamon; Pamela K McAllister; Bruce D Minsky; Joanne Ngeow; Muhammad R Abu Hassan; Kim Ryan; Veena Shankaran; Melissa P Upton; John Zalcberg; Cornelis J van de Velde; Rob Tollenaar
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Trends in colorectal cancer mortality in Europe: retrospective analysis of the WHO mortality database.

Authors:  Driss Ait Ouakrim; Cécile Pizot; Magali Boniol; Matteo Malvezzi; Mathieu Boniol; Eva Negri; Maria Bota; Mark A Jenkins; Harry Bleiberg; Philippe Autier
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.