Literature DB >> 35106791

Disparities in the acceptance of chromosomal microarray at the time of prenatal genetic diagnosis.

Kate Swanson1,2, Kelsey B Loeliger3, Shilpa P Chetty1,4, Teresa N Sparks1,4,5, Mary E Norton1,2,4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Chromosomal microarray (CMA) increases the diagnostic yield of prenatal genetic diagnostic testing but is not universally performed. Our objective was to identify provider and patient characteristics associated with the acceptance of CMA at the time of prenatal genetic diagnostic testing.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing prenatal genetic diagnostic testing (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis) at a single institution between 2014 and 2020. Primary outcome was the acceptance of CMA based on the genetic counselor ,GC who saw the patient. Secondary analyses assessed patient characteristics associated with the acceptance of CMA.
RESULTS: 2372 participants were included. Fifty-eight percent of participants accepted CMA. Acceptance of CMA varied significantly by GC, ranging from 31% to 90%. Patients with public insurance and those who identified as Black or Hispanic/Latina were less likely to have CMA performed (aOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.20-0.30, and 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.92). Even among those with a structural anomaly present, public insurance was associated with significantly lower odds of CMA being performed (aOR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.61).
CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance of CMA at the time of prenatal genetic diagnostic testing varied based on the GC performing the counseling. Public insurance was associated with lower frequency of accepting CMA.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35106791      PMCID: PMC9116240          DOI: 10.1002/pd.6109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.242


  8 in total

Review 1.  Microarrays in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Beatrice Oneda; Anita Rauch
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 5.237

Review 2.  Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S C Hillman; D J McMullan; G Hall; F S Togneri; N James; E J Maher; C H Meller; D Williams; R J Wapner; E R Maher; M D Kilby
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  The utilization of prenatal microarray: A survey of current genetic counseling practices and barriers.

Authors:  Leslie Durham; Ramesha Papanna; Blair Stevens; Sarah Noblin; David Rodriguez-Buritica; S Shahrukh Hashmi; Nevena Krstic
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Chromosomal microarray use among women undergoing invasive prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Mariam Naqvi; Ilona T Goldfarb; Kaitlin J Hanmer; Allison Bryant
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis: report of first 6 months in clinical practice.

Authors:  Susan Klugman; Barrie Suskin; Brianna L Spencer; Pe'er Dar; Komal Bajaj; Judith Powers; Julie Reichling; David Wasserman; Siobhan M Dolan; Irwin R Merkatz
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-11-26

6.  Prenatal chromosomal microarray uptake with invasive prenatal diagnosis: How many patients take the leap?

Authors:  Claire N Singletary; Nevena Cvjetkovic Krstic; Jennifer L Czerwinski; Meagan Giles Choates; Chelsea Wagner
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Variants of uncertain significance in prenatal microarrays: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  A H Mardy; A P Wiita; B V Wayman; K Drexler; T N Sparks; M E Norton
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Danielle Soucier; Karen Hanson; Melissa S Savage; Laird Jackson; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 8.822

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.