Literature DB >> 27130707

Chromosomal microarray use among women undergoing invasive prenatal diagnosis.

Mariam Naqvi1, Ilona T Goldfarb1, Kaitlin J Hanmer1, Allison Bryant1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the offer and uptake of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) among women undergoing invasive prenatal testing.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis. Charts were reviewed for CMA offer and uptake, in additional to clinical and demographic variables.
RESULTS: One hundred forty-one women underwent CVS (n = 53) or amniocentesis (n = 91) over the study period. Overall, 41% of women underwent CMA. Women who underwent invasive testing for a fetal structural abnormality were more likely to undergo CMA than women who underwent invasive testing for all other indications (aOR 43.18, 95% CI 4.64 - 401.58). Chromosomal microarray was offered more often to women who primarily spoke English (p < 0.001), self-identified as white (p = 0.046) and did not receive prenatal care in a community health center (p = 0.044). Statistically significant differences in CMA uptake by race/ethnicity, language, insurance or provider type were not noted. Multiparous women were less likely to accept this test than nulliparas (aOR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17 - 0.86).
CONCLUSION: Women who undergo invasive fetal testing are more likely to undergo CMA if the indication is for a fetal structural anomaly. There may be important demographic disparities in the offering of CMA which bear further exploration.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27130707     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  3 in total

Review 1.  How should costs and cost-effectiveness be considered in prenatal genetic testing?

Authors:  Teresa N Sparks; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.300

2.  Disparities in the acceptance of chromosomal microarray at the time of prenatal genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Kate Swanson; Kelsey B Loeliger; Shilpa P Chetty; Teresa N Sparks; Mary E Norton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.242

Review 3.  Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gioia Mastromoro; Daniele Guadagnolo; Nader Khaleghi Hashemian; Enrica Marchionni; Alice Traversa; Antonio Pizzuti
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.