Literature DB >> 35106161

Unexplained left Mullerian agenesis with agenesis of left kidney: A case report.

Johnbosco E Mamah1, Obiamaka O Ofodile1, Azubuike K Onyebuchi2, Chichetaram R Otu2, Zubaida Aliyu-Abubakar1, Nnaemeka Egbuonu3.   

Abstract

The exact incidence of Mullerian agenesis is unknown because women with this condition might be asymptomatic and diagnosis is mostly incidental. We report an incidental finding of left Mullerian agenesis involving the left fallopian tube, left ovary, and the left kidney following evaluation and treatment for a right tubal ectopic pregnancy.
© 2022 The Authors. Clinical Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mullerian anomaly; absent fallopian tube and ovary; absent kidney

Year:  2022        PMID: 35106161      PMCID: PMC8787725          DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.5273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Case Rep        ISSN: 2050-0904


INTRODUCTION

Congenital absence of an adnexa impacts a patient's fertility potential and could be associated with renal anomalies. Preservation of the existing healthy organ(s) should be the rule and when this is not possible, adequate patient counseling, informed consent, and psychological support should be provided. Congenital absence of the fallopian tube and ovary is a rare finding. The exact incidence is unknown; a rate of 1 in 11,000–12,000 has been quoted in the literatures. , , , ,  The exact mechanism of occurrence is difficult to determine but many researchers attribute this to one of two possibilities; a congenital absence of the paramesonephric ducts or unilateral torsion and/or vascular accident with necrosis and auto‐amputation of the adnexa during intrauterine life, childhood, or in adult life. , , ,  We here report an incidental laparoscopic finding of unilateral absence of the left fallopian tube and ovary in a patient undergoing surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. A literature review , , , , , , , , , , , and possible aetiopathogenesis are discussed.

CASE REPORT

Ms SM was 36 years old in her second pregnancy who presented to our early pregnancy assessment unit with complaint of irregular vaginal bleeding of 1‐week duration and 8 weeks amenorrhoea. In her first pregnancy, she was delivered via an emergency cesarean section ten months earlier. Following her presentation, she had a transvaginal ultrasound scan which showed an empty uterine cavity with an endometrial thickness measuring 23.0 mm. The right adnexa showed an inhomogeneous mass measuring 49 mm × 24 mm × 24 mm with a visible gestational sac which contained an embryo with a crown‐lump length of 22.2 mm, equivalent to 8 weeks and 6 days gestational age. There was no visible fetal heartbeat. The right ovary was normal. The left ovary was not visualized. There was no haemoperitoneum. A diagnosis of right tubal ectopic pregnancy was made. She gave no history of recent or past pelvic infection, no previous tubal or adnexal surgery, no previous history of acute abdomen, no use of contraceptive, and she was not a smoker. Her blood tests were normal, serum beta human chorionic gonadotrophin level was 22,329 IU/L. She was counseled and consented for a diagnostic laparoscopy and surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Intraoperatively, we noted a complete absence of the left fallopian tube and ovary (blue arrow in Figure 1). The right ovary appeared healthy; the right fallopian tube harboring the ectopic pregnancy was removed (yellow arrow in Figure 2). Postoperatively she was debriefed and discharged the next day. Four weeks later, she had a renal ultrasound scan which showed an absent left kidney (red arrow in Figure 3) with a normal right kidney (white arrow in Figure 4) and bladder. She continued to menstruate, indicating normal ovarian function. She was counseled regarding reproductive options and discharged.
FIGURE 1

The blue arrow indicates the left uterine Cornu with no tube, round ligament and ovary

FIGURE 2

The yellow arrow shows the right Fallopian tube stump following right salpinhectomy

FIGURE 3

Ultrasound image of the left renal bed (red arrow) with no kidney visualised on ultrasound scan

FIGURE 4

Ultrasound image of the right renal bed showing a well developed right kidney (white arrow)

The blue arrow indicates the left uterine Cornu with no tube, round ligament and ovary The yellow arrow shows the right Fallopian tube stump following right salpinhectomy Ultrasound image of the left renal bed (red arrow) with no kidney visualised on ultrasound scan Ultrasound image of the right renal bed showing a well developed right kidney (white arrow)

DISCUSSION

Unexplained unilateral or less commonly bilateral absence of the ovary and/or tube in the presence of a normal uterus is a rare finding. , Sometimes, it is difficult to determine the exact cause in any individual patient but three possible mechanism of etiology has been reported in the literatures. , , , , , , , , , , , , In no particular order, first is the mechanical hypothesis; this assumes an asymptomatic torsion of one or both adnexa (or either of tube or ovary) during intrauterine development of the fetus, childhood, or adult life. This is believed to result in ischemic necrosis and auto‐amputation of the affected organ. , ,  The second possible etiology is during organogenesis. Embryologically, the uterus and fallopian tubes develop from the paramesonephric ducts while the ovaries develop from the urogenital ridge with the germ cells arising from the yolk sac. , A defective development or resorption of either of the aforementioned embryological tissues would result in unilateral or bilateral absence of the tube(s) and ovary(ies). This is also more likely to lead to concomitant renal anomalies. Finally, an unexplained asymptomatic vascular accident with ischemic necrosis and resorption of the affected organ during intrauterine or extra‐uterine life has been suggested. This patient had no recollection of an acute abdominal event as a child or adult; an acute pain is one of the typical presenting features of organ torsion associated with ischemia and necrosis. , , Intraoperatively, we did not find any vestigial tissue or fibrous bands suggestive of a previously existing organ that may have undergone infarction. This leaves us with congenital non‐development of the paramesonephric duct and urogenital ridge structures as possible explanation for this finding. This is because she had an absent left ovary, with absent fallopian tube and renal system on the same side.  These organs were present, appeared healthy, and functioning normally on the right side safe for the ectopic pregnancy. This possibility is reinforced by findings from similar case reports. , We observe that majority of the patients reported in the literature as detailed in Table 1 had their diagnosis while being investigated for infertility, , , , , , , , , Ms SM never had difficulty with conception but ectopic pregnancy has been reported as a complication of mullerian anomalies. She had salpingectomy which effectively means she would be incapable of a normal natural conception. She was debriefed and counseled on the alternative ways of getting pregnant including the use of in vitro fertilization using own gametes since had a normal right ovary and child adoption. From our literature search (Table 1), 14 of the 22 patients reported, just like our patient had their abnormality on the left side. , , , , , , , , , , The reason for this preponderance is not immediately clear but calls for further research.
TABLE 1

Literature reports

Author (Reference)IndicationAbsent adnexal organUterine anomaliesRenal system anomalies
Uckuyu et al. 1
Case 1InfertilityLeft ovary and tubeNormalNormal
Case 2InfertilityRight tubeNormalNot reported
Case 3InfertilityLeft ovaryNormalNormal
Case 4Acute abdomenLeft ovaryNormalNormal
Yerebasmaz et al. 2
Case 1Acute abdomenRight fallopian tube and ovaryNot reportedNormal
Case 2Chronic pelvic painRight ovary and tubeNot reportedNormal
Case 3Adnexal massLeft fallopian tube and ovaryNot reportedNormal
Case 4InfertilityLeft ovaryNot reportedNormal
Sivanesaratnam 3
Case 1SterilizationLeft fallopian tube and ovaryNormalNormal
Case 2InfertilityRight ovary and tubeNot reportedNormal
Tzitzimikas et al. 4 Acute pelvic painLeft ovaryNormalNormal
Rastogi et al. 5 Infertility

Left ovary and tube

NormalNormal
Sirisena 6 Acute abdomenLeft fallopian tube and left ovaryNormalNormal
Eustace 7
Case 1InfertilityRight ovary and tubeNormalNormal
Case 2SterilizationRight ovary and tubeNot reportedNot reported
Chen et al. 8 InfertilityLeft ovary and tubeNormalNot reported
Pabuccu et al. 9 InfertilityLeft ovary and tubeNormalNormal
Haydardedeoglu et al. 10 Hysterectomy for fibroid uterusLeft ovaryUnicornuate uterusIpsilateral renal agenesis
Mulayim et al. 11 InfertilityLeft tube and ovaryUnicornuate uterusPelvic kidney
Barsky et al. 13
Case 1Adnexal torsionLeft ovary and tubeNormalNormal
Case 2Adnexal tumorRight ovary and tubeNormalNormal
Vaiarelli et al. 12 InfertilityRight ovary and tubeNormalNormal
Literature reports Left ovary and tube In conclusion, congenital absence of the left kidney, ovary, and fallopian tube are rare events. An incidental finding such as ours should prompt further evaluation to detect co‐existing anomalies. These are important considerations in patient counseling especially with regard to lifestyle modification and/or choices to ensure healthy preservation of existing organ(s).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We report no conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

JM and OO conceptualized the case. JM, AO, OO, and NE reviewed the literature. JM and AO with contributions from CO and ZA wrote the initial draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

CONSENT

Informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this case reports/images in accordance with the journal's patient consent policy and for the sole purpose of advancing scientific knowledge.
  9 in total

1.  Congenital absence of fallopian tube and ovary.

Authors:  D L Eustace
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1992-09-23       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 2.  Ectopic pregnancy after IVF in a patient with unilateral agenesis of the fallopian tube and ovary and with endometriosis: search of the literature for these associations.

Authors:  Alberto Vaiarelli; Janelle Luk; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Unilateral absence of fallopian tube and ovary in an infertile patient.

Authors:  Emre Pabuccu; Korhan Kahraman; Salih Taskın; Cem Atabekoglu
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Unexplained unilateral absence of ovary and fallopian tube.

Authors:  V Sivanesaratnam
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  A case of unicornuate uterus with ipsilateral ovarian and renal agenesis.

Authors:  Bulent Haydardedeoglu; Erhan Simsek; Esra Bulgan Kilicdag; Ebru Tarim; Erdogan Aslan; Tayfun Bagis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Unexplained absence of an ovary and uterine tube.

Authors:  L A Sirisena
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 7.  Unilateral congenital ovarian and partial tubal absence: report of four cases with review of the literature.

Authors:  Ayla Uckuyu; Emel E Ozcimen; F Ceylan Sevinc Ciftci
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Unicornuate uterus and unilateral ovarian agenesis associated with pelvic kidney.

Authors:  B Mülayim; S Demirbaşoğlu; O Oral
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Unilateral ovarian and fallopian tube agenesis in an infertile patient with a normal uterus.

Authors:  Bingya Chen; Chunbo Yang; Zayd Sahebally; Hangmei Jin
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 2.447

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.