| Literature DB >> 35104432 |
Hai Xin1, Xingqiang He2, Jun Li3, Xiaomei Guan3, Xukui Liu3, Yuewei Wang3, Liyuan Niu3, Deqiang Qiu3, Xuejun Wu1, Haofu Wang3.
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a common and serious disease with a high mortality rate, but its genetic determinants have not been fully identified. In this feasibility study, we aimed to elucidate the transcriptome profile of AAA and further reveal its molecular mechanisms through the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) MinION platform. Overall, 9574 novel transcripts and 781 genes were identified by comparing and analysing the redundant-removed transcripts of all samples with known reference genome annotations. We characterized the alternative splicing, alternative polyadenylation events and simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci information based on full-length transcriptome data, which would help us further understand the genome annotation and gene structure of AAA. Moreover, we proved that ONT methods were suitable for the identification of lncRNAs via identifying the comprehensive expression profile of lncRNAs in AAA. The results of differentially expressed transcript (DET) analysis showed that a total of 7044 transcripts were differentially expressed, of which 4278 were upregulated and 2766 were downregulated among two groups. In the KEGG analysis, 4071 annotated DETs were involved in human diseases, organismal systems and environmental information processing. These pilot findings might provide novel insights into the pathogenesis of AAA and provide new ideas for the optimization of personalized treatment of AAA, which is worthy of further study in subsequent studies.Entities:
Keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm; alternative polyadenylation; alternative splicing; lncRNAs; nanopore-based RNA sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35104432 PMCID: PMC8807055 DOI: 10.1098/rsob.210172
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Biol ISSN: 2046-2441 Impact factor: 6.411
Figure 1Study design illustration.
Figure 2Identifying and characterizing AS, APA events and SSR loci information. (a) AS of different types. a: intron retention; b: alternative 5′ splice site; c: alternative exon; d: alternative 3′ splice site; e: exon-skipping. (b) AS event distribution in two groups. (c) Heatmap of AS events corresponding to transcripts. (d) Distribution of different SSR types of specific SSR identifying in ONT.
Figure 3The distribution map of predicted CDS-coding protein length, transcription factor types and characterization of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) were determined. (a) Length distributions of the CDS lengths of complete ORFs. (b) Distribution of transcription factor types. (c) Venn diagrams displaying the counts of candidate lncRNAs filtered by CNCI, CPC, CPAT and Pfam result. (d) Map of lncRNA position classification.
Figure 4The overall distribution of transcript expressions of samples. (a) Comparison map of CPM density distribution of each sample. (b) Boxplot of CPM of each sample.
Figure 5Dynamic expression of transcripts in AAA. (a) Volcano plot of DETs. (b) MA plot of DETs. (c) Clustering map of DETs.
Figure 6GO and KEGG annotation and enrichment of DETs. (a) GO annotation and classification of DETs. (b) KEGG classification figure of DETs.
Figure 7COG classification and PPI network of DETs. (a) The statistical figure of COG annotation and classification of DETs. (b) PPI network of DET protein.