Literature DB >> 35100408

Robust detection of natural selection using a probabilistic model of tree imbalance.

Enes Dilber1, Jonathan Terhorst1.   

Abstract

Neutrality tests such as Tajima's D and Fay and Wu's H are standard implements in the population genetics toolbox. One of their most common uses is to scan the genome for signals of natural selection. However, it is well understood that D and H are confounded by other evolutionary forces-in particular, population expansion-that may be unrelated to selection. Because they are not model-based, it is not clear how to deconfound these tests in a principled way. In this article, we derive new likelihood-based methods for detecting natural selection, which are robust to fluctuations in effective population size. At the core of our method is a novel probabilistic model of tree imbalance, which generalizes Kingman's coalescent to allow certain aberrant tree topologies to arise more frequently than is expected under neutrality. We derive a frequency spectrum-based estimator that can be used in place of D, and also extend to the case where genealogies are first estimated. We benchmark our methods on real and simulated data, and provide an open source software implementation.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  natural selection; neutrality test; site frequency spectrum

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35100408      PMCID: PMC8893258          DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  61 in total

Review 1.  Genomic insights into positive selection.

Authors:  Shameek Biswas; Joshua M Akey
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  The genealogy of samples in models with selection.

Authors:  C Neuhauser; S M Krone
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Estimating allele age and selection coefficient from time-serial data.

Authors:  Anna-Sapfo Malaspinas; Orestis Malaspinas; Steven N Evans; Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Detecting Recent Positive Selection with a Single Locus Test Bipartitioning the Coalescent Tree.

Authors:  Zongfeng Yang; Junrui Li; Thomas Wiehe; Haipeng Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence.

Authors:  S A Sawyer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Widespread genomic signatures of natural selection in hominid evolution.

Authors:  Graham McVicker; David Gordon; Colleen Davis; Phil Green
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  A map of recent positive selection in the human genome.

Authors:  Benjamin F Voight; Sridhar Kudaravalli; Xiaoquan Wen; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  High-throughput inference of pairwise coalescence times identifies signals of selection and enriched disease heritability.

Authors:  Pier Francesco Palamara; Jonathan Terhorst; Yun S Song; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Genome-wide association analysis of 19,629 individuals identifies variants influencing regional brain volumes and refines their genetic co-architecture with cognitive and mental health traits.

Authors:  Bingxin Zhao; Tianyou Luo; Tengfei Li; Yun Li; Jingwen Zhang; Yue Shan; Xifeng Wang; Liuqing Yang; Fan Zhou; Ziliang Zhu; Hongtu Zhu
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 38.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.