Literature DB >> 29217523

Detecting Recent Positive Selection with a Single Locus Test Bipartitioning the Coalescent Tree.

Zongfeng Yang1,2, Junrui Li1,3, Thomas Wiehe4, Haipeng Li5.   

Abstract

Many population genomic studies have been conducted in the past to search for traces of recent events of positive selection. These traces, however, can be obscured by temporal variation of population size or other demographic factors. To reduce the confounding impact of demography, the coalescent tree topology has been used as an additional source of information for detecting recent positive selection in a population or a species. Based on the branching pattern at the root, we partition the hypothetical coalescent tree, inferred from a sequence sample, into two subtrees. The reasoning is that positive selection could impose a strong impact on branch length in one of the two subtrees while demography has the same effect on average on both subtrees. Thus, positive selection should be detectable by comparing statistics calculated for the two subtrees. Simulations demonstrate that the proposed test based on these principles has high power to detect recent positive selection even when DNA polymorphism data from only one locus is available, and that it is robust to the confounding effect of demography. One feature is that all components in the summary statistics ([Formula: see text]) can be computed analytically. Moreover, misinference of derived and ancestral alleles is seen to have only a limited effect on the test, and it therefore avoids a notorious problem when searching for traces of recent positive selection.
Copyright © 2018 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  adaptation; demography; positive selection

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29217523      PMCID: PMC5788538          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.117.300401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  82 in total

1.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Searching for footprints of positive selection in whole-genome SNP data from nonequilibrium populations.

Authors:  Pavlos Pavlidis; Jeffrey D Jensen; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Empirical Bayes Estimation of Coalescence Times from Nucleotide Sequence Data.

Authors:  Leandra King; John Wakeley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 6.  Positive natural selection in the human lineage.

Authors:  P C Sabeti; S F Schaffner; B Fry; J Lohmueller; P Varilly; O Shamovsky; A Palma; T S Mikkelsen; D Altshuler; E S Lander
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Revisiting classic clines in Drosophila melanogaster in the age of genomics.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Adrion; Matthew W Hahn; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Predicting Carriers of Ongoing Selective Sweeps without Knowledge of the Favored Allele.

Authors:  Roy Ronen; Glenn Tesler; Ali Akbari; Shay Zakov; Noah A Rosenberg; Vineet Bafna
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  3 in total

1.  Robust detection of natural selection using a probabilistic model of tree imbalance.

Authors:  Enes Dilber; Jonathan Terhorst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Sweeps in time: leveraging the joint distribution of branch lengths.

Authors:  Gertjan Bisschop; Konrad Lohse; Derek Setter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Selective Sweeps Under Dominance and Inbreeding.

Authors:  Matthew Hartfield; Thomas Bataillon
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.154

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.