Literature DB >> 35100193

Disparities in Hypoxemia Detection by Pulse Oximetry Across Self-Identified Racial Groups and Associations With Clinical Outcomes.

Nicole R Henry1, Andrew C Hanson2, Phillip J Schulte2, Nafisseh S Warner3, Megan N Manento4, Timothy J Weister5, Matthew A Warner4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess disparities in hypoxemia detection by pulse oximetry across self-identified racial groups and associations with clinical outcomes.
DESIGN: Observational cohort study from May 5, 2018, to December 31, 2020.
SETTING: Three academic medical centers in the United States. PATIENTS: Adults greater than or equal to 18 years who self-identified as White, Black, Asian, or American Indian admitted to the ICU or undergoing surgery during inpatient hospitalization with simultaneous measurements of pulse oximetry-estimated oxygen saturation and arterial blood gas-derived oxygen saturation.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multivariable models were employed to assess the relationships between race, occult hypoxemia (i.e., arterial blood gas-derived oxygen saturation < 88% despite pulse oximetry-estimated oxygen saturation ≥ 92%), and clinical outcomes of hospital mortality and hospital-free days. One-hundred twenty-eight-thousand two-hundred eighty-five paired pulse oximetry-estimated oxygen saturation-arterial blood gas-derived oxygen saturation measurements were included from 26,603 patients. Pulse oximetry-estimated oxygen saturation on average overestimated arterial blood gas-derived oxygen saturation by 1.57% (1.54-1.61%). Black, Asian, and American Indian patients were more likely to experience occult hypoxemia during hospitalization (estimated probability 6.2% [5.1-7.6%], 6.6% [4.9-8.8%], and 6.6% [4.4-10.0%], respectively) compared with White patients (3.6% [3.4-3.8%]). Black patients had increased odds of occult hypoxemia compared with White patients after adjustment (odds ratio, 1.65; 1.28-2.14; p < 0.001). Differences in occult hypoxemia between Asian and American Indian patients compared with White patients were not significant after adjustment (odds ratio, 1.53; 0.95-2.47; p = 0.077 and odds ratio, 1.31; 0.80-2.16; p = 0.288, respectively). Occult hypoxemia was associated with increased odds of mortality in surgical (odds ratio, 2.96; 1.20-7.28; p = 0.019) and ICU patients (1.36; 1.03-1.80; p = 0.033). Occult hypoxemia was associated with fewer hospital-free days in surgical (-2.5 d [-3.9 to -1.2 d]; p < 0.001) but not ICU patients (0.4 d [-0.7 to 1.4 d]; p = 0.500).
CONCLUSIONS: Occult hypoxemia is more common in Black patients compared with White patients and is associated with increased mortality, suggesting potentially important outcome implications for undetected hypoxemia. It is imperative to validate pulse oximetry with expanded racial inclusion.
Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35100193      PMCID: PMC9070439          DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   9.296


  10 in total

1.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  A review of ASA physical status - historical perspectives and modern developments.

Authors:  D Mayhew; V Mendonca; B V S Murthy
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Effects of skin pigmentation on pulse oximeter accuracy at low saturation.

Authors:  Philip E Bickler; John R Feiner; John W Severinghaus
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Racial Bias in Pulse Oximetry Measurement Among Patients About to Undergo Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in 2019-2020: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Valeria S M Valbuena; Ryan P Barbaro; Dru Claar; Thomas S Valley; Robert P Dickson; Steven E Gay; Michael W Sjoding; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 10.262

5.  The effect of patient ethnicity on the accuracy of peripheral pulse oximetry in patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis: a single-centre, retrospective analysis.

Authors:  M D Wiles; A El-Nayal; G Elton; M Malaj; J Winterbottom; C Gillies; I K Moppett; K Bauchmuller
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 12.893

6.  The incidence and effect on outcome of hypoxemia in hospitalized medical patients.

Authors:  D L Bowton; P E Scuderi; E F Haponik
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults.

Authors:  W A Knaus; D P Wagner; E A Draper; J E Zimmerman; M Bergner; P G Bastos; C A Sirio; D J Murphy; T Lotring; A Damiano
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Dark skin decreases the accuracy of pulse oximeters at low oxygen saturation: the effects of oximeter probe type and gender.

Authors:  John R Feiner; John W Severinghaus; Philip E Bickler
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Racial Bias in Pulse Oximetry Measurement.

Authors:  Michael W Sjoding; Robert P Dickson; Theodore J Iwashyna; Steven E Gay; Thomas S Valley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 176.079

10.  Association Between Hypoxemia and Mortality in Patients With COVID-19.

Authors:  Jiang Xie; Naima Covassin; Zhengyang Fan; Prachi Singh; Wei Gao; Guangxi Li; Tomas Kara; Virend K Somers
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 7.616

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Pulse oximetry in primary care: factors affecting accuracy and interpretation.

Authors:  Paul Silverston; Marco Ferrari; Valentina Quaresima
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Racial bias and reproducibility in pulse oximetry among medical and surgical inpatients in general care in the Veterans Health Administration 2013-19: multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Valeria S M Valbuena; Sarah Seelye; Michael W Sjoding; Thomas S Valley; Robert P Dickson; Steven E Gay; Dru Claar; Hallie C Prescott; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 3.  Skin Pigmentation Influence on Pulse Oximetry Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Ana M Cabanas; Macarena Fuentes-Guajardo; Katina Latorre; Dayneri León; Pilar Martín-Escudero
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  The Big Consequences of Small Discrepancies: Why Racial Differences in Pulse Oximetry Errors Matter.

Authors:  Andre L Holder; An-Kwok Ian Wong
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Overt and occult hypoxemia in patients hospitalized with novel coronavirus disease 2019.

Authors:  Shrirang M Gadrey; Piyus Mohanty; Sean P Haughey; Beck A Jacobsen; Kira J Dubester; Katherine M Webb; Rebecca L Kowalski; Jessica J Dreicer; Robert T Andris; Matthew T Clark; Christopher C Moore; Andre Holder; Rishi Kamaleswaran; Sarah J Ratcliffe; J Randall Moorman
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2022-06-16

6.  Pulse Oximetry and Race in Critically Ill Adults.

Authors:  Kevin P Seitz; Li Wang; Jonathan D Casey; Shannon A Markus; Karen E Jackson; Edward T Qian; Wesley H Self; Todd W Rice; Matthew W Semler
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-09-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.