Literature DB >> 3510015

Routine ultrasound screening for antenatal detection of intrauterine growth retardation.

S L Warsof, D J Cooper, D Little, S Campbell.   

Abstract

This prospective screening program of a large obstetric population was designed to determine the effectiveness of ultrasonic biometry to diagnose intrauterine growth retardation. The results of 3616 pregnancies were analyzed. All pregnancies were dated before the 24th week by ultrasonic measurements. The study compared the effectiveness of three ultrasonic growth parameters: biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference, and abdominal circumference, to detect intrauterine growth retardation and to determine the optimal gestational age to perform the scan for this purpose. To maintain a high sensitivity required in a screening program, all ultrasonic measurements below the 25th percentile for gestational age were considered abnormal. The predictive value of a positive test in this situation ranged from 0.25 to 0.55, depending on the week of gestation in which the scan was performed. Accuracy of predictions improved greatly when the scans were performed within two weeks of delivery. Abdominal circumference measurements were more predictive of intrauterine growth retardation than either head circumference or BPD measurements or the combination of these parameters. In view of the sensitivity of the test and the prevalence of the disorder, it is concluded that 34 +/- 1 weeks of gestation is the optimal time to screen patients ultrasonically for intrauterine growth retardation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3510015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Foetal growth parameters--clinical versus ultrasonographic.

Authors:  M Berry; K J Coyaji; M P Gogoi; B S Kodkany; K S Parikh; D Patel; M Y Rawal; P C Sengupta; V Walvekar; B S Dhillon
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of fundal height and handheld ultrasound-measured abdominal circumference to screen for fetal growth abnormalities.

Authors:  Adriane F Haragan; Thomas C Hulsey; Angela F Hawk; Roger B Newman; Eugene Y Chang
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Morphological and functional evaluation of normal and abnormal fetal growth by ultrasonography.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Yoshizato; Shoji Satoh
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 4.  Clinical utility of quantitative imaging.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Brian J Bartholmai; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Richard G Abramson; Kirsteen R Burton; John-Paul J Yu; Ernest M Scalzetti; Thomas E Yankeelov; Rathan M Subramaniam; Leon Lenchik
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Color doppler evaluation of cerebral-umbilical pulsatility ratio and its usefulness in the diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation and prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.

Authors:  Shahina Bano; Vikas Chaudhary; Sanjay Pande; Vl Mehta; Ak Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2010-02

6.  Fetal Growth Restriction in Hypertensive vs. Heavy Smoking Women-Placental Pathology, Ultrasound Findings, and Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel Tairy; Eran Weiner; Michal Kovo; Astar Maloul Zamir; Erika Gandelsman; Michal Levy; Hadas Ganer Herman; Eldar Volpert; Letizia Schreiber; Jacob Bar; Giulia Barda
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.060

7.  Hepato - Cephalic Index as a Predictor of Intrauterine Growth Restriction.

Authors:  Ramadan Dacaj; Sebija Izetbegovic; Goran Stojkanovic; Curr Gjocaj
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2016-02-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.