Literature DB >> 35096477

Clinician- and Patient-reported Endpoints in CNS Orphan Drug Clinical Trials: ISCTM Position Paper on Best Practices for Endpoint Selection, Validation, Training, and Standardization.

Joan Busner1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, Gahan Pandina1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, SilviaZaragoza Domingo1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, Anna-Karin Berger1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, Maria T Acosta1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, Nahome Fisseha1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, Joseph Horrigan1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, Jelena Ivkovic1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, William Jacobson1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, Dennis Revicki1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, Victoria Villalta-Gil1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The International Society of CNS Clinical Trials Methodology (ISCTM) Working Group on Rare Disease/Orphan Drug Development is dedicated to improving and streamlining trials to best develop new treatments for rare diseases. The rarity of these disorders requires a drug development strategy that differs from those of nonrare conditions. Rare disease drug development programs are challenged with small sample sizes, heterogeneous clinical presentations, and few, if any, off-the-shelf endpoints. When disease-specific clinical endpoints exist, they might not be validated and are typically not well known or broadly used in clinical practice. This paper aims to provide an overview of the special issues surrounding endpoints in rare disease drug development, with guidance, practical applications, and discussion. DISCUSSION: The paper covers regulatory considerations in endpoint selection; identification of relevant measurement domains; methods of quantifying clinical meaningfulness; incorporation of patient- and clinician-reported outcomes; considerations for global clinician- and patient-rated clinical assessments; cognition assessment challenges in rare diseases; translation considerations; training, standardization, and calibration of assessors; and endpoint quality assurance. Additionally, it provides guidance and resources for those involved in drug development for rare diseases.
CONCLUSION: In keeping with the mission of ISCTM and the rare disease/orphan drug development working group, this article is designed to encourage thoughtful consideration and provide insight and guidance to promote and further efforts in in central nervous system (CNS) rare disease drug development efforts.
Copyright © 2021. Matrix Medical Communications. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CGI; COAs; Endpoints; International Society of CNS Clinical Trials Methodology (ISCTM); PGI; assessment; eCOAs; measurement; orphan disease; orphan drug development; outcomes; position paper; rare disease

Year:  2021        PMID: 35096477      PMCID: PMC8794479     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 2158-8333


  20 in total

1.  The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice.

Authors:  Joan Busner; Steven D Targum
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2007-07

2.  Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline.

Authors:  Valmi D Sousa; Wilaiporn Rojjanasrirat
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Comparison of physician and patient assessments of incontinence severity and improvement.

Authors:  Ilker Yalcin; Lars Viktrup
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-02-28

4.  Patient-Focused Drug Development: A New Direction for Collaboration.

Authors:  Eleanor M Perfetto; Laurie Burke; Elisabeth M Oehrlein; Robert S Epstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Development of global rating instruments for pediatric patients with ataxia telangiectasia.

Authors:  Andreea Nissenkorn; Rupam Borgohain; Roberto Micheli; Vincenzo Leuzzi; Anaita Udwadia Hegde; Kandadai Rukmini Mridula; Anna Molinaro; Daniela D'Agnano; Sireesha Yareeda; Bruria Ben-Zeev
Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Neurol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.140

6.  The Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia scale: a simple instrument to measure the diversity of symptoms present in schizophrenia.

Authors:  J M Haro; S A Kamath; S Ochoa; D Novick; K Rele; A Fargas; M J Rodríguez; R Rele; J Orta; A Kharbeng; S Araya; M Gervin; J Alonso; V Mavreas; E Lavrentzou; N Liontos; K Gregor; P B Jones
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl       Date:  2003

7.  Remote assessment of disease and relapse in major depressive disorder (RADAR-MDD): a multi-centre prospective cohort study protocol.

Authors:  F Matcham; C Barattieri di San Pietro; V Bulgari; G de Girolamo; R Dobson; H Eriksson; A A Folarin; J M Haro; M Kerz; F Lamers; Q Li; N V Manyakov; D C Mohr; I Myin-Germeys; V Narayan; Penninx Bwjh; Y Ranjan; Z Rashid; A Rintala; S Siddi; S K Simblett; T Wykes; M Hotopf
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Development of an adapted Clinical Global Impression scale for use in Angelman syndrome.

Authors:  Alexander Kolevzon; Pamela Ventola; Christopher J Keary; Gali Heimer; Jeffrey L Neul; Mathews Adera; Judith Jaeger
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Enhancing the incorporation of the patient's voice in drug development and evaluation.

Authors:  Meghana Chalasani; Pujita Vaidya; Theresa Mullin
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2018-04-02

Review 10.  Emerging good practices for Translatability Assessment (TA) of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) measures.

Authors:  Catherine Acquadro; Donald L Patrick; Sonya Eremenco; Mona L Martin; Dagmara Kuliś; Helena Correia; Katrin Conway
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.