Literature DB >> 35089948

Examining the reliability and validity of two versions of the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT).

Hanno Andreas Ohmann1, Niclas Kuper2, Jan Wacker1.   

Abstract

The Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) has gained validity evidence from several studies. However, various modifications have been applied to the original version, which have never been compared systematically. In Study 1, we tested 120 healthy participants to directly compare two versions of the EEfRT. In Study 2, we tested a larger sample of 394 healthy participants to further examine the original EEfRT. We replicated the split-half reliability of both task versions. However, self-reported personality traits (e.g., trait BAS) correlated with only some task performance parameters in Study 1, which did not replicate for the original EEfRT in Study 2. Our results indicate complex and sometimes inconsistent relations between different personality traits, task properties, and reward attributes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35089948      PMCID: PMC8797221          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  51 in total

1.  Incentive motivation deficits in schizophrenia reflect effort computation impairments during cost-benefit decision-making.

Authors:  Gagan Fervaha; Ariel Graff-Guerrero; Konstantine K Zakzanis; George Foussias; Ofer Agid; Gary Remington
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Effect of failure/success feedback and the moderating influence of personality on reward motivation.

Authors:  Deepika Anand; Katherine A Oehlberg; Michael T Treadway; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2015-03-11

3.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The Positive Valence Systems Scale: Development and Validation.

Authors:  Gabriela Kattan Khazanov; Ayelet Meron Ruscio; Courtney N Forbes
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2019-08-16

5.  Effort-Based Decision-Making Paradigms for Clinical Trials in Schizophrenia: Part 2—External Validity and Correlates.

Authors:  William P Horan; L Felice Reddy; Deanna M Barch; Robert W Buchanan; Eduardo Dunayevich; James M Gold; Steven R Marder; Jonathan K Wynn; Jared W Young; Michael F Green
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Choosing to make an effort: the role of striatum in signaling physical effort of a chosen action.

Authors:  I T Kurniawan; B Seymour; D Talmi; W Yoshida; N Chater; R J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Anhedonia or anergia? Effects of haloperidol and nucleus accumbens dopamine depletion on instrumental response selection in a T-maze cost/benefit procedure.

Authors:  J D Salamone; M S Cousins; S Bucher
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Parabolic discounting of monetary rewards by physical effort.

Authors:  Matthias N Hartmann; Oliver M Hager; Philippe N Tobler; Stefan Kaiser
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Adults with autism spectrum disorders exhibit decreased sensitivity to reward parameters when making effort-based decisions.

Authors:  Cara R Damiano; Joseph Aloi; Michael Treadway; James W Bodfish; Gabriel S Dichter
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 4.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.