Literature DB >> 7718155

Anhedonia or anergia? Effects of haloperidol and nucleus accumbens dopamine depletion on instrumental response selection in a T-maze cost/benefit procedure.

J D Salamone1, M S Cousins, S Bucher.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to study the role of dopamine in the performance of a novel cost/benefit procedure. Rats were trained on a T-maze task in which one arm contained a high reinforcement density (4 x 45 mg Bioserve pellets) and the other arm contained a low reinforcement density (2 x 45 mg pellets). Different groups of rats were trained either with unobstructed access to both arms from the start area, or under a condition in which a large vertical barrier (44 cm) was placed in the arm that contained the high density of food reinforcement. In the first experiment, rats trained under each procedure received injections of 0.1 mg/kg haloperidol and tartaric acid vehicle as a control procedure. Analysis of variance indicated that there was a significant effect of the barrier on maze arm choice, a significant effect of haloperidol, and a significant drug x barrier interaction. Haloperidol did not affect arm choice in rats tested without the barrier present, but this drug significantly reduced the number of selections of the arm with high reinforcement density when the barrier was present. In the second experiment, groups of rats were trained as described above, and then received intraaccumbens injections of 6-hydroxydopamine or ascorbate vehicle. Nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions produced by 6-hydroxydopamine decreased the number of selections of the arm with high reinforcement density when the barrier was present, but had no effect on arm choice when the barrier was not present.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7718155     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(94)90108-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  158 in total

1.  Phasic nucleus accumbens dopamine release encodes effort- and delay-related costs.

Authors:  Jeremy J Day; Joshua L Jones; R Mark Wightman; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 2.  Translational Assessment of Reward and Motivational Deficits in Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Andre Der-Avakian; Samuel A Barnes; Athina Markou; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016

3.  Assessment of a glycine uptake inhibitor in animal models of effort-related choice behavior: implications for motivational dysfunctions.

Authors:  Samantha E Yohn; Daniela Alberati; Merce Correa; John D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Modeling operant behavior in the Parkinsonian rat.

Authors:  Irene Avila; Mark P Reilly; Federico Sanabria; Diana Posadas-Sánchez; Claudia L Chavez; Nikhil Banerjee; Peter Killeen; Eddie Castañeda
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  High on food: the interaction between the neural circuits for feeding and for reward.

Authors:  Jing-Jing Liu; Diptendu Mukherjee; Doron Haritan; Bogna Ignatowska-Jankowska; Ji Liu; Ami Citri; Zhiping P Pang
Journal:  Front Biol (Beijing)       Date:  2015-02-10

Review 6.  Dopamine and reward: the anhedonia hypothesis 30 years on.

Authors:  Roy A Wise
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.911

7.  Affective status in relation to impulsive, motor and motivational symptoms: personality, development and physical exercise.

Authors:  Tomas Palomo; Richard J Beninger; Richard M Kostrzewa; Trevor Archer
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.911

Review 8.  The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonism reverses the effects of dopamine receptor antagonism on instrumental output and effort-related choice in the rat: implications for studies of psychomotor slowing.

Authors:  Andrew M Farrar; Mariana Pereira; Francisco Velasco; Jörg Hockemeyer; Christa E Müller; John D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Pharmacological characterization of performance on a concurrent lever pressing/feeding choice procedure: effects of dopamine antagonist, cholinomimetic, sedative and stimulant drugs.

Authors:  M S Cousins; W Wei; J D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.