Literature DB >> 35088055

Weakly-supervised High-resolution Segmentation of Mammography Images for Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Carlos Fernandez-Granda1,2, Krzysztof J Geras3,1, Kangning Liu1, Yiqiu Shen1, Nan Wu1, Jakub Chłędowski4.   

Abstract

In the last few years, deep learning classifiers have shown promising results in image-based medical diagnosis. However, interpreting the outputs of these models remains a challenge. In cancer diagnosis, interpretability can be achieved by localizing the region of the input image responsible for the output, i.e. the location of a lesion. Alternatively, segmentation or detection models can be trained with pixel-wise annotations indicating the locations of malignant lesions. Unfortunately, acquiring such labels is labor-intensive and requires medical expertise. To overcome this difficulty, weakly-supervised localization can be utilized. These methods allow neural network classifiers to output saliency maps highlighting the regions of the input most relevant to the classification task (e.g. malignant lesions in mammograms) using only image-level labels (e.g. whether the patient has cancer or not) during training. When applied to high-resolution images, existing methods produce low-resolution saliency maps. This is problematic in applications in which suspicious lesions are small in relation to the image size. In this work, we introduce a novel neural network architecture to perform weakly-supervised segmentation of high-resolution images. The proposed model selects regions of interest via coarse-level localization, and then performs fine-grained segmentation of those regions. We apply this model to breast cancer diagnosis with screening mammography, and validate it on a large clinically-realistic dataset. Measured by Dice similarity score, our approach outperforms existing methods by a large margin in terms of localization performance of benign and malignant lesions, relatively improving the performance by 39.6% and 20.0%, respectively. Code and the weights of some of the models are available at https://github.com/nyukat/GLAM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer screening; high-resolution medical images; weakly supervised learning

Year:  2021        PMID: 35088055      PMCID: PMC8791642     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Mach Learn Res


  19 in total

Review 1.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks.

Authors:  Shaoqing Ren; Kaiming He; Ross Girshick; Jian Sun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 6.226

Review 3.  Deep learning with noisy labels: Exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysis.

Authors:  Davood Karimi; Haoran Dou; Simon K Warfield; Ali Gholipour
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Globally-Aware Multiple Instance Classifier for Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Yiqiu Shen; Nan Wu; Jason Phang; Jungkyu Park; Gene Kim; Linda Moy; Kyunghyun Cho; Krzysztof J Geras
Journal:  Mach Learn Med Imaging       Date:  2019-10-10

5.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Eric J Topol
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Eigenrank by committee: Von-Neumann entropy based data subset selection and failure prediction for deep learning based medical image segmentation.

Authors:  Bilwaj Gaonkar; Joel Beckett; Mark Attiah; Christine Ahn; Matthew Edwards; Bayard Wilson; Azim Laiwalla; Banafsheh Salehi; Bryan Yoo; Alex A T Bui; Luke Macyszyn
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Deep Neural Networks Improve Radiologists' Performance in Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Nan Wu; Jason Phang; Jungkyu Park; Yiqiu Shen; Zhe Huang; Masha Zorin; Stanislaw Jastrzebski; Thibault Fevry; Joe Katsnelson; Eric Kim; Stacey Wolfson; Ujas Parikh; Sushma Gaddam; Leng Leng Young Lin; Kara Ho; Joshua D Weinstein; Beatriu Reig; Yiming Gao; Hildegard Toth; Kristine Pysarenko; Alana Lewin; Jiyon Lee; Krystal Airola; Eralda Mema; Stephanie Chung; Esther Hwang; Naziya Samreen; S Gene Kim; Laura Heacock; Linda Moy; Kyunghyun Cho; Krzysztof J Geras
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Scott Mayer McKinney; Marcin Sieniek; Varun Godbole; Jonathan Godwin; Natasha Antropova; Hutan Ashrafian; Trevor Back; Mary Chesus; Greg S Corrado; Ara Darzi; Mozziyar Etemadi; Florencia Garcia-Vicente; Fiona J Gilbert; Mark Halling-Brown; Demis Hassabis; Sunny Jansen; Alan Karthikesalingam; Christopher J Kelly; Dominic King; Joseph R Ledsam; David Melnick; Hormuz Mostofi; Lily Peng; Joshua Jay Reicher; Bernardino Romera-Paredes; Richard Sidebottom; Mustafa Suleyman; Daniel Tse; Kenneth C Young; Jeffrey De Fauw; Shravya Shetty
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Detecting and classifying lesions in mammograms with Deep Learning.

Authors:  Dezső Ribli; Anna Horváth; Zsuzsa Unger; Péter Pollner; István Csabai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.