| Literature DB >> 35087968 |
Xiao Liu1,2,3, Yali Miao2,4,5, Haifeng Liang6, Jingjing Diao1,2,7, Lijing Hao1,2,3,4,5, Zhifeng Shi1,2,7, Naru Zhao1,2,3,4,5, Yingjun Wang1,2,3,4,5,8.
Abstract
Calcium phosphate bio-ceramics are osteo-conductive, but it remains a challenge to promote the induction of bone augmentation and capillary formation. The surface micro/nano-topography of materials can be recognized by cells and then the cell fate are mediated. Traditional regulation methods of carving surface structures on bio-ceramics employ mineral reagents and organic additives, which might introduce impurity phases and affect the biological results. In a previous study, a facile and novel method was utilized with ultrapure water as the unique reagent for hydrothermal treatment, and a uniform hydroxyapatite (HAp) surface layer was constructed on composite ceramics (β-TCP/CaSiO3) in situ. Further combined with 3D printing technology, biomimetic hierarchical structure scaffolds were fabricated with interconnected porous composite ceramic scaffolds as the architecture and micro/nano-rod hybrid HAp as the surface layer. The obtained HAp surface layer favoured cell adhesion, alleviated the cytotoxicity of precursor scaffolds, and upregulated the cellular differentiation of mBMSCs and gene expression of HUVECs in vitro. In vivo studies showed that capillary formation, bone augmentation and new bone matrix formation were upregulated after the HAp surface layer was obtained, and the results confirmed that the fabricated biomimetic hierarchical structure scaffold could be an effective candidate for bone regeneration.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printed porous scaffold; Bioactive ceramics; Bone augmentation; Cell fate mediation; HAp surface layer
Year: 2021 PMID: 35087968 PMCID: PMC8777208 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioact Mater ISSN: 2452-199X
Scheme 1Brief illustration of the study.
Primer sequences for RT-PCR mBMSCs.
| Gene | Direction | Sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | Forward | TGTGTCCGTCGTGGATCTGA |
| Reverse | TTGCTGTTGAAGTCGCAGGAG | |
| OPN | Forward | TGCAAACACCGTTGTAACCAAAAGC |
| Reverse | TGCAGTGGCCGTTTGCATTTCT | |
| OCN | Forward | AGCAGCTTGGCCCAGACCTA |
| Reverse | TAGCGCCGGAGTCTGTTCACTAC | |
| OSX | Forward | CGTCCTCTCTGCTTGAGGAA |
| Reverse | CTTGAGAAGGGAGCTGGGTA | |
| Col-I | Forward | ATGCCGCGACCTCAAGATG |
| Reverse | TGAGGCACAGACGGCTGAGTA |
Primer sequences for RT-PCR HUVECs.
| Gene | Direction | Sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | Forward | GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAACA |
| Reverse | TGGTGAAGACGCCAGTGGA | |
| CD31 | Forward | CCGCATATCCAAGGTCAGCA |
| Reverse | CACCTTGGTCCAGATGTGTGAA | |
| KDR | Forward | AGCCAGCTCTGGATTTGTGGA |
| Reverse | CATGCCCTTAGCCACTTGGAA | |
| TGF-β | Forward | TCCTGGCGATACCTCAGCAA |
| Reverse | GCTAAGGCGAAAGCCCTCAA | |
| VEGF | Forward | CATCCAATCGAGACCCTGGTG |
| Reverse | TTGGTGAGGTTTGATCCGCATA |
Primer sequences for integrin subunit RT-PCR.
| Gene | Direction | Sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | Forward | TGTGTCCGTCGTGGATCTGA |
| Reverse | TTGCTGTTGAAGTCGCAGGAG | |
| α2 | Forward | TGCCTACTTGTGTGGCGTGAA |
| Reverse | TCACCCGAGTGGTAGTCACAATG | |
| α5 | Forward | TGAACTGCACGGCAGATACAGAG |
| Reverse | ATCCCGCTTGGTGATGAGATG | |
| αv | Forward | TGCAGTGGTTCGGAGCAACCCTA |
| Reverse | TTTTCTGTGCGCCAGCTATAC | |
| β1 | Forward | ATCATGCAGGTTGCGGTTTG |
| Reverse | GGTGACATTGTCCATCATTGGGTA |
Fig. 1(A) and (A1) show the pre-treated original scaffolds (Os). (B) and (B1) show the surface micro/nano-structure of 3D scaffolds (NMs) via hydrothermal treatment in ultrapure water for 24 h at 120°C. TEM of the obtained micro/nano-hydroxyapatite crystals. The obtained crystals were peeled from the surface. (C1) TEM image on carbon film. (C2) Selected area electron diffraction (SAED). (C3) High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM). (C4) HR-TEM image of the margin. BET measurements of the surface. (D) Specific surface area of Os and NMs and the associated nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms. The inset picture shows the micro-pore volume distribution.
Fig. 2(A) XRD measurement on the surface of Os and NMs. The code of standard JCPDS is shown in the inset; circles represent the peak of β-TCP, while triangles correspond to HAp. (B) EDS mapping of the surface elements. The listed elements are calcium, phosphorus and silicon, with Ca/P = 1.60.
Fig. 3Gene expression of integrins after culturing mBMSCs in DMEM for 12 h. The measured subunits are (A) α2, (B) α5, (C) αv and (D) β1.
Fig. 4(A) Immunofluorescence of osteocalcin on scaffolds, DMEM culture for 2 d and osteogenic medium culture for 12 d. Scale bar 200 μm. Detail with 50 μm as the scale bar. (B) mBMSCs osteogenic differentiation on the scaffolds. The targeted gene markers were OSX, Col-I, OCN and OPN.
Fig. 5(A) Immunofluorescence of CD31 on scaffolds and HUVECs cultured for 7 d in ECM. Scale bar 200 μm. Detail with 50 μm as the scale bar. (B) Gene expression of angiogenesis markers in HUVECs cultured on scaffolds for 7 d. Targeted gene markers were CD31, KDR, TGF-β and VEGF.
Fig. 6(A) H&E staining of the HAp scaffold (Hs), β-TCP scaffold (Ts), β-TCP/CaSiO3 scaffold (Os) and scaffold with a micro/nano-HAp surface layer (NMs). Scale bar 200 μm. (B) Masson staining of the HAp scaffold (Hs), β-TCP scaffold (Ts), β-TCP/CaSiO3 scaffold (Os) and scaffold with a micro/nano-HAp surface layer (NMs). Scale bar 200 μm (M: materials, CB: cortical bone, NB: new bone matrix, black arrows indicate osteogenesis).
Fig. 7OCN staining of the HAp scaffold (Hs), β-TCP scaffold (Ts), β-TCP/CaSiO3 scaffold (Os) and scaffold with a micro/nano-HAp surface layer (NMs). Scale bar 200 μm.
Fig. 8(A) H&E staining of HAp scaffold (Hs), β-TCP scaffold (Ts), β-TCP/CaSiO3 scaffold (Os) and scaffold with a micro/nano-HAp surface layer (NMs). Scale bar 200 μm.. (B) Masson staining of HAp scaffold (Hs), β-TCP scaffold (Ts), β-TCP/CaSiO3 scaffold (Os) and scaffold with a micro/nano-HAp surface layer (NMs). Scale bar 200 μm. (M: materials, CV: capillary vessel, black arrows indicate CVs).