Literature DB >> 18404698

Comparative in vivo study of six hydroxyapatite-based bone graft substitutes.

Pamela Habibovic1, Moyo C Kruyt, Maria V Juhl, Stuart Clyens, Roberta Martinetti, Laura Dolcini, Naseem Theilgaard, Clemens A van Blitterswijk.   

Abstract

Improvement of synthetic bone graft substitutes as suitable alternatives to a patient's own bone graft remains a challenge in biomaterials research. Our goal was to answer the question of whether improved osteoinductivity of a material would also translate to better bone-healing orthotopically. Three porous biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) ceramics (BCPA, BCPB, and BCPC), consisting of hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate, a porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic reinforced with a bioresorbable polylactic acid to improve its mechanical properties (BCPC+), a pure hydroxyapatite ceramic (HA), and a carbonated apatite ceramic (CA) were implanted intramuscularly and orthotopically by using a transverse process model in 11 goats for 12 weeks. BCPA and BCPB had similar chemical composition but differed in their microstructure. BCPB was not osteoinductive at all, but BCPA induced ectopic bone formation in 9 of 11 animals. Orthotopically, BCPA performed better than BCPB in both the amount and rate of bone formation. BCPC, similar to BCPA structurally and physicochemically, showed comparable results ectopically and orthotopically. Addition of resorbable polymer to BCPC made the material less osteoinductive (4 of 11 animals) and delayed bone formation orthotopically. Neither HA nor CA were osteoinductive, and their orthotopic performance was inferior to the osteoinductive ceramics. The results of the present study showed that material-derived osteoinduction significantly enhanced bone healing orthotopically, and that this material property appeared more sensitive for predicting orthotopic performance than physicochemical and structural characteristics. (c) 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18404698     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  36 in total

1.  Effect of low-level laser therapy irradiation and Bio-Oss graft material on the osteogenesis process in rabbit calvarium defects: a double blind experimental study.

Authors:  Amir Alireza Rasouli Ghahroudi; Amir Reza Rokn; Katayoun A M Kalhori; Afshin Khorsand; Alireza Pournabi; A L B Pinheiro; Reza Fekrazad
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  [Tissue engineering of bone tissue. Principles and clinical applications].

Authors:  B Schmidt-Rohlfing; C Tzioupis; C L Menzel; H C Pape
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Novel approaches to bone grafting: porosity, bone morphogenetic proteins, stem cells, and the periosteum.

Authors:  Peter Petrochenko; Roger J Narayan
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2010

4.  The effect of Emdogain and platelet-derived growth factor on the osteoinductive potential of hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate.

Authors:  R C Chan; V Marino; P M Bartold
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Controlled nucleation of hydroxyapatite on alginate scaffolds for stem cell-based bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Darilis Suárez-González; Kara Barnhart; Eiji Saito; Ray Vanderby; Scott J Hollister; William L Murphy
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Multiple silk coatings on biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds: effect on physical and mechanical properties and in vitro osteogenic response of human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Jiao Jiao Li; Eun Seok Gil; Rebecca S Hayden; Chunmei Li; Seyed-Iman Roohani-Esfahani; David L Kaplan; Hala Zreiqat
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 6.988

7.  Mechanical strength of ceramic scaffolds reinforced with biopolymers is comparable to that of human bone.

Authors:  S S Henriksen; M Ding; M Vinther Juhl; N Theilgaard; S Overgaard
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 8.  An overview of recent advances in designing orthopedic and craniofacial implants.

Authors:  Venkata P Mantripragada; Beata Lecka-Czernik; Nabil A Ebraheim; Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 9.  Biomaterials for Craniofacial Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Greeshma Thrivikraman; Avathamsa Athirasala; Chelsea Twohig; Sunil Kumar Boda; Luiz E Bertassoni
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2017-10

Review 10.  Stepping into the omics era: Opportunities and challenges for biomaterials science and engineering.

Authors:  Nathalie Groen; Murat Guvendiren; Herschel Rabitz; William J Welsh; Joachim Kohn; Jan de Boer
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.