Literature DB >> 15621247

3D microenvironment as essential element for osteoinduction by biomaterials.

Pamela Habibovic1, Huipin Yuan, Chantal M van der Valk, Gert Meijer, Clemens A van Blitterswijk, Klaas de Groot.   

Abstract

In order to unravel the mechanism of osteoinduction by biomaterials, in this study we investigated the influence of the specific surface area on osteoinductive properties of two types of calcium phosphate ceramics. Different surface areas of the ceramics were obtained by varying their sintering temperatures. Hydroxyapatite (HA) ceramic was sintered at 1150 and 1250 degrees C. Biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) ceramic, consisting of HA and beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP), was sintered at 1100, 1150 and 1200 degrees C. Changes in sintering temperature did not influence the chemistry of the ceramics; HA remained pure after sintering at different temperatures and the weight ratio of HA and beta-TCP in the BCP was independent of the temperature as well. Similarly, macroporosity of the ceramics was unaffected by the changes of the sintering temperature. However, microporosity (pore diameter <10 microm) significantly decreased with increasing sintering temperature. In addition to the decrease of the microporosity, the crystal size increased with increasing sintering temperature. These two effects resulted in a significant decrease of the specific surface area of the ceramics with increasing sintering temperatures. Samples of HA1150, HA1250, BCP1100, BCP1150 and BCP1200 were implanted in the back muscles of Dutch milk goats and harvested at 6 and 12 weeks post implantation. After explantation, histomorphometrical analysis was performed on all implants. All implanted materials except HA1250 induced bone. However, large variations in the amounts of induced bone were observed between different materials and between individual animals. Histomorphometrical results showed that the presence of micropores within macropore walls is necessary to make a material osteoinductive. We postulate that introduction of microporosity within macropores, and consequent increase of the specific surface area, affects the interface dynamics of the ceramic in such a way that relevant cells are triggered to differentiate into the osteogenic lineage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15621247     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  89 in total

1.  Osteoinductive ceramics as a synthetic alternative to autologous bone grafting.

Authors:  Huipin Yuan; Hugo Fernandes; Pamela Habibovic; Jan de Boer; Ana M C Barradas; Ad de Ruiter; William R Walsh; Clemens A van Blitterswijk; Joost D de Bruijn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The Role of the Microenvironment in Controlling the Fate of Bioprinted Stem Cells.

Authors:  Lauren N West-Livingston; Jihoon Park; Sang Jin Lee; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Interactions of total bone marrow cells with increasing quantities of macroporous calcium phosphate ceramic granules.

Authors:  Damien Le Nihouannen; Laure Duval; Antoine Lecomte; Marion Julien; Jérôme Guicheux; Guy Daculsi; Pierre Layrolle
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Bone ingrowth in zirconia and hydroxyapatite scaffolds with identical macroporosity.

Authors:  Johan Malmström; Erik Adolfsson; Lena Emanuelsson; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Hybrid structure in PCL-HAp scaffold resulting from biomimetic apatite growth.

Authors:  M Lebourg; J Suay Antón; J L Gomez Ribelles
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Current progress in inorganic artificial biomaterials.

Authors:  Zhixia Li; Masakazu Kawashita
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 7.  Biomaterials for Bone Regenerative Engineering.

Authors:  Xiaohua Yu; Xiaoyan Tang; Shalini V Gohil; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 9.933

8.  Osteoinduction by Ca-P biomaterials implanted into the muscles of mice.

Authors:  Rui-na Yang; Feng Ye; Li-jia Cheng; Jin-jing Wang; Xiao-feng Lu; Yu-jun Shi; Hong-song Fan; Xing-dong Zhang; Hong Bu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.066

9.  Comparison of three block bone substitutes for bone regeneration: long-term observation in the beagle dog.

Authors:  Kosaku Sawada; Ken Nakahara; Maiko Haga-Tsujimura; Tateyuki Iizuka; Masako Fujioka-Kobayashi; Kensuke Igarashi; Nikola Saulacic
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.634

10.  Chitosan-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sheeny Lan Levengood; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 6.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.