Literature DB >> 35078357

Long-distance dependencies in birdsong syntax.

William A Searcy1, Jill Soha2, Susan Peters2, Stephen Nowicki2.   

Abstract

Songbird syntax is generally thought to be simple, in particular lacking long-distance dependencies in which one element affects choice of another occurring considerably later in the sequence. Here, we test for long-distance dependencies in the sequences of songs produced by song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Song sparrows sing with eventual variety, repeating each song type in a consecutive series termed a 'bout'. We show that in switching between song types, song sparrows follow a 'cycling rule', cycling through their repertoires in close to the minimum possible number of bouts. Song sparrows do not cycle in a set order but rather vary the order of song types from cycle to cycle. Cycling in a variable order strongly implies long-distance dependencies, in which choice of the next type depends on the song types sung over the past cycle, in the range of 9-10 bouts. Song sparrows also follow a 'bout length rule', whereby the number of repetitions of a song type in a bout is positively associated with the length of the interval until that type recurs. This rule requires even longer distance dependencies that cross one another; such dependencies are characteristic of more complex levels of syntax than previously attributed to non-human animals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal communication; birdsong; language evolution; song; syntax

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35078357      PMCID: PMC8790354          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  14 in total

Review 1.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?

Authors:  Marc D Hauser; Noam Chomsky; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The statistical sign test.

Authors:  W J DIXON; A M MOOD
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  1946-12       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner; Kimberly M Fenn; Daniel Margoliash; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Meaningful call combinations and compositional processing in the southern pied babbler.

Authors:  Sabrina Engesser; Amanda R Ridley; Simon W Townsend
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Sound sequences in birdsong: how much do birds really care?

Authors:  Adam R Fishbein; William J Idsardi; Gregory F Ball; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong.

Authors:  Robert C Berwick; Kazuo Okanoya; Gabriel J L Beckers; Johan J Bolhuis
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Song types as fundamental units in vocal repertoires.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Song type matching is an honest early threat signal in a hierarchical animal communication system.

Authors:  Çağlar Akçay; Mari E Tom; S Elizabeth Campbell; Michael D Beecher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Parallels in the sequential organization of birdsong and human speech.

Authors:  Tim Sainburg; Brad Theilman; Marvin Thielk; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Assessing the uniqueness of language: Animal grammatical abilities take center stage.

Authors:  Carel Ten Cate
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Syntactic modulation of rhythm in Australian pied butcherbird song.

Authors:  Jeffrey Xing; Tim Sainburg; Hollis Taylor; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.653

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.