Literature DB >> 12446899

The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?

Marc D Hauser1, Noam Chomsky, W Tecumseh Fitch.   

Abstract

We argue that an understanding of the faculty of language requires substantial interdisciplinary cooperation. We suggest how current developments in linguistics can be profitably wedded to work in evolutionary biology, anthropology, psychology, and neuroscience. We submit that a distinction should be made between the faculty of language in the broad sense (FLB) and in the narrow sense (FLN). FLB includes a sensory-motor system, a conceptual-intentional system, and the computational mechanisms for recursion, providing the capacity to generate an infinite range of expressions from a finite set of elements. We hypothesize that FLN only includes recursion and is the only uniquely human component of the faculty of language. We further argue that FLN may have evolved for reasons other than language, hence comparative studies might look for evidence of such computations outside of the domain of communication (for example, number, navigation, and social relations).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12446899     DOI: 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  450 in total

1.  A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Kenji Doya; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Confrontational scavenging as a possible source for language and cooperation.

Authors:  Derek Bickerton; Eörs Szathmáry
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.260

3.  The minimalist grammar of action.

Authors:  Katerina Pastra; Yiannis Aloimonos
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Carel ten Cate; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  The neurobiology of syntax: beyond string sets.

Authors:  Karl Magnus Petersson; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Processing multiple non-adjacent dependencies: evidence from sequence learning.

Authors:  Meinou H de Vries; Karl Magnus Petersson; Sebastian Geukes; Pienie Zwitserlood; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  How semantic biases in simple adjacencies affect learning a complex structure with non-adjacencies in AGL: a statistical account.

Authors:  Fenna H Poletiek; Jun Lai
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Language, gesture, skill: the co-evolutionary foundations of language.

Authors:  Kim Sterelny
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  The co-evolution of language and emotions.

Authors:  Eva Jablonka; Simona Ginsburg; Daniel Dor
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  A Bayesian phylogenetic approach to estimating the stability of linguistic features and the genetic biasing of tone.

Authors:  Dan Dediu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.