Literature DB >> 35078200

Translational Science, DNA Commercialization, and Informed Consent: The Need for Specific Terminology, Insights from a Review of H3Africa Projects.

Patricia Marshall1, Charmaine D M Royal2, Ruth Chadwick3.   

Abstract

In the past decade, there has been an acceleration in genomic research, its applications, and its translation into healthcare products and services for the benefit of public health. These advances are critical to realizing the potential of genomic research for facilitating improved health and disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Despite its tremendous opportunities, the dynamic and increasingly global landscape of genomic research commercialization has been accompanied by a variety of ethical challenges and concerns. The potential for unauthorized use of DNA samples from African people to develop a DNA chip amplifies discussion on the meanings, implications, and impacts of commercialization, benefit sharing, and appropriate consent in genomic research. Leadership of the Human Heredity and Health in Africa (H3Africa) Consortium convened a panel of experts to review research ethics practices employed in H3Africa Consortium projects and make recommendations regarding commercialization. Eighteen investigators submitted documents for projects involving data sharing and use of genetic information. A total of 39 informed consent documents associated with the 18 projects were reviewed. All 18 projects specified that samples would be used in future research. Less than half of the projects included language noting that samples could be used in drug or product development, that DNA samples would not be sold, and that profits would not be shared with participants. Four projects referred to commercialization. Analysis of information included in consent documents contributed to the development of a Commercialization Typology. The Typology identifies factors to consider regarding acceptability of particular instances of commercialization. DNA samples for translational research in product development require a transparent commercialization framework to inform the consent process.
© 2022 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Commercialization Typology; DNA commercialization; Ethics of genetic research; H3Africa; Informed consent

Year:  2022        PMID: 35078200      PMCID: PMC9216313          DOI: 10.1159/000521371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.132


  33 in total

1.  Editorial: genetic and genomic research-changing patterns of accountability.

Authors:  Jeantine E Lunshof; Ruth Chadwick
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Give African research participants more say in genomic data, say scientists.

Authors:  Linda Nordling
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Broad Consent for Genomic Research and Biobanking: Perspectives from Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Paulina Tindana; Jantina de Vries
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 8.929

4.  Genetics lab accused of misusing African DNA.

Authors:  Erik Stokstad
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Informed consent and ethical re-use of African genomic data.

Authors:  Galen E B Wright; Adebowale A Adeyemo; Nicki Tiffin
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.639

6.  Understandings of genomic research in developing countries: a qualitative study of the views of MalariaGEN participants in Mali.

Authors:  Karim Traore; Susan Bull; Alassane Niare; Salimata Konate; Mahamadou A Thera; Dominic Kwiatkowski; Michael Parker; Ogobara K Doumbo
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  "It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.

Authors:  Keymanthri Moodley; Shenuka Singh
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Model framework for governance of genomic research and biobanking in Africa - a content description.

Authors:  Aminu Yakubu; Paulina Tindana; Alice Matimba; Katherine Littler; Nchangwi Syntia Munung; Ebony Madden; Ciara Staunton; Jantina De Vries
Journal:  AAS Open Res       Date:  2018-04-18

9.  Broad consent for biobanks is best - provided it is also deep.

Authors:  Rasmus Bjerregaard Mikkelsen; Mickey Gjerris; Gunhild Waldemar; Peter Sandøe
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  A framework for tiered informed consent for health genomic research in Africa.

Authors:  Victoria Nembaware; Katherine Johnston; Alpha A Diallo; Maritha J Kotze; Alice Matimba; Keymanthri Moodley; Godfrey B Tangwa; Rispah Torrorey-Sawe; Nicki Tiffin
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  1 in total

1.  African Genetic Representation in the Context of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Severity.

Authors:  Desiree C Petersen; Chrystal Steyl; Denise Scholtz; Bienyameen Baker; Ibtisam Abdullah; Caitlin Uren; Marlo Möller
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.772

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.