| Literature DB >> 35072817 |
Nawshad Muhammad1, Zenab Sarfraz2, Muhammad Sohail Zafar3, Saad Liaqat4, Abdur Rahim5, Pervaiz Ahmad6, Abdullah Alsubaie7, Abdulraheem S A Almalki8, Mayeen Uddin Khandaker9.
Abstract
Acrylic resins-based artificial teeth are frequently used for the fabrication of dentures has and contribute a very strong share in the global market. However, the scientific literature reporting the comparative analysis data of various artificial teeth is scarce. Focusing on that, the present study investigated various types of commercially available artificial teeth, composed of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Artificial teeth are characterized for chemical analysis, morphological features, thermal analysis, and mechanical properties (surface hardness, compressive strength). Different types of artificial teeth showed distinct mechanical (compression strength, Vickers hardness) and thermal properties (thermal gravimetric analysis) which may be attributed to the difference in the content of PMMA and type and quantity of different fillers in their composition. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) results exhibited that vinyl end groups of PMMA degraded above 200 °C, whereas 340-400 °C maximum degradation temperature was measured by differential thermal analysis (DTA) for all samples. Crisma brand showed the highest compressive strength and young modulus (88.6 MPa and 1654 MPa) while the lowest value of Vickers hardness was demonstrated by Pigeon and Vital brands. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) photographs showed that Crisma, Pigeon, and Vital exhibited characteristics of a brittle fracture; however, Artis and Well bite brands contained elongated voids on their surfaces. According to the mechanical analysis and SEM data, Well bite teeth showed a significantly higher mechanical strength compared to other groups. However, no considerable difference was observed in Vickers hardness of all groups. Graphical abstract.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35072817 PMCID: PMC8786782 DOI: 10.1007/s10856-022-06645-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med ISSN: 0957-4530 Impact factor: 3.896
Brands and respective groups of selected PMMA artificial teeth
| Sr. No | Brand | Group | Composition |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Artis | A | Acrylic |
| 2 | Well bite | B | Acrylic |
| 3 | Crisma | C | Acrylic |
| 4 | Pigeon | D | Acrylic |
| 5 | Vital | E | Acrylic |
Fig. 1FTIR spectra of different brands of artificial teeth (Group A–E)
Fig. 2TGA curves illustrating the thermal degradation temperatures of the PMMA based artificial teeth
Fig. 3DTA of artificial teeth Group A–E
Fig. 4The typical stress-strain curves and values of ultimate compressive strength of the artificial teeth samples
Fig. 5Compressive Strength (MPa) and Modulus (MPa) Data of group A–E
Fig. 6Vickers Hardness (Kg/mm2) Data of artificial teeth samples
Fig. 7SEM micrographs of fracture surfaces of artificial teeth after compressions tests
Fig. 8Water uptake behavior of different groups of artificial teeth with standard deviations error bars