Literature DB >> 35072269

Procedural adverse events in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease undergoing chronic automated red cell exchange.

Jenna Wade1,2,3, Marianne E M Yee1,4,5, Kirk A Easley6, Shannon Pahz7, Hailly Butler1, Patricia E Zerra1,4,5, Cassandra D Josephson1,4,5, Ross M Fasano1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic automated red cell exchange (RCE) is increasingly employed for sickle cell disease (SCD). There is a paucity of data on the incidence of RCE adverse events (AEs) and potential patient and procedural risk factors for AEs.
METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric SCD patients receiving chronic RCE over 3 years was performed to determine the frequency of AEs and identify procedural and patient AE risk factors. AE incidence, AE rate, incidence rate ratios (IRRs), and relative risks (RRs) were calculated based on various procedural and patient characteristics by univariable (UV) and multivariable (MV) analyses.
RESULTS: In 38 patients receiving 760 procedures, there were 150 (19.7%) AEs, 36 (4.7%) were symptomatic AEs. AE rates were 20.2 [95% CI 17.2, 23.6] and 4.8 [95% CI 3.49, 6.70] per 100 person months for AEs and symptomatic AEs, respectively. AE incidences were: hypocalcemia (117; 15.4%), dizziness (22; 3.0%), hypotension (15; 2.0%), and nausea (14; 1.8%). Patients with baseline Hct ≥30% experienced more total AEs and symptomatic AEs. Patients with pre-procedure systolic BP <50th percentile, severe CNS vasculopathy, and non-SCA genotype (HbSC or Sβ+ thalassemia) exhibited more total AEs. IHD depletion was not associated with an increased incidence of AEs or symptomatic AEs.
CONCLUSION: SCD patients with Hct ≥30%, systolic BP <50th percentile, severe CNS vasculopathy, and possibly non-SCA genotype may be at higher risk for RCE-related AEs. The effect of IHD on AE risk is likely minimal. Individualized AE risk assessment should be performed in all SCD patients undergoing chronic automated RCE.
© 2022 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35072269      PMCID: PMC8959247          DOI: 10.1111/trf.16807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  17 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of the depletion-red cell exchange program with the Spectra Optia and the isovolemic hemodilution-red cell exchange method with the COBE Spectra in sickle cell disease patients.

Authors:  Pascale Poullin; Frederick Sanderson; Emmanuelle Bernit; Marion Brun; Yael Berdah; Catherine Badens
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Analysis of the evidence for the lower limit of systolic and mean arterial pressure in children.

Authors:  Ikram U Haque; Arno L Zaritsky
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.624

3.  Controlled trial of transfusions for silent cerebral infarcts in sickle cell anemia.

Authors:  Michael R DeBaun; Mae Gordon; Robert C McKinstry; Michael J Noetzel; Desiree A White; Sharada A Sarnaik; Emily R Meier; Thomas H Howard; Suvankar Majumdar; Baba P D Inusa; Paul T Telfer; Melanie Kirby-Allen; Timothy L McCavit; Annie Kamdem; Gladstone Airewele; Gerald M Woods; Brian Berman; Julie A Panepinto; Beng R Fuh; Janet L Kwiatkowski; Allison A King; Jason M Fixler; Melissa M Rhodes; Alexis A Thompson; Mark E Heiny; Rupa C Redding-Lallinger; Fenella J Kirkham; Natalia Dixon; Corina E Gonzalez; Karen A Kalinyak; Charles T Quinn; John J Strouse; J Philip Miller; Harold Lehmann; Michael A Kraut; William S Ball; Deborah Hirtz; James F Casella
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Differential cerebral hemometabolic responses to blood transfusions in adults and children with sickle cell anemia.

Authors:  Meher R Juttukonda; Chelsea A Lee; Niral J Patel; Larry T Davis; Spencer L Waddle; Melissa C Gindville; Sumit Pruthi; Adetola A Kassim; Michael R DeBaun; Manus J Donahue; Lori C Jordan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Discontinuing prophylactic transfusions used to prevent stroke in sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Robert J Adams; Donald Brambilla
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Advantages of isovolemic hemodilution-red cell exchange therapy to prevent recurrent stroke in sickle cell anemia patients.

Authors:  Ravi Sarode; Karén Matevosyan; Zora R Rogers; James D Burner; Cynthia Rutherford
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.821

Review 7.  Erythrocytapheresis for chronic transfusion therapy in sickle cell disease: survey of current practices and review of the literature.

Authors:  Shannon Kelly; Keith Quirolo; Anne Marsh; Lynne Neumayr; Alicia Garcia; Brian Custer
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 8.  Management of Patients with Sickle Cell Disease Using Transfusion Therapy: Guidelines and Complications.

Authors:  Stella T Chou; Ross M Fasano
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.722

9.  Risk of recurrent stroke in patients with sickle cell disease treated with erythrocyte transfusions.

Authors:  C H Pegelow; R J Adams; V McKie; M Abboud; B Berman; S T Miller; N Olivieri; E Vichinsky; W Wang; D Brambilla
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for sickle cell disease: transfusion support.

Authors:  Stella T Chou; Mouaz Alsawas; Ross M Fasano; Joshua J Field; Jeanne E Hendrickson; Jo Howard; Michelle Kameka; Janet L Kwiatkowski; France Pirenne; Patricia A Shi; Sean R Stowell; Swee Lay Thein; Connie M Westhoff; Trisha E Wong; Elie A Akl
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-01-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.