Literature DB >> 17273118

Analysis of the evidence for the lower limit of systolic and mean arterial pressure in children.

Ikram U Haque1, Arno L Zaritsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) are essential evaluation elements in ill children, but there is wide variation among different sources defining systolic hypotension in children, and there are no normal reference values for MAP. Our goal was to calculate the 5th percentile SBP and MAP values in children from recently updated data published by the task force working group of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program and compare these values with the lowest limit of acceptable SBP and MAP defined by different sources.
DESIGN: Mathematical analysis of clinical database.
METHODS: The 50th and 95th percentile SBP values from task force data were used to derive the 5th percentile value for children from 1 to 17 yrs of age stratified by height percentiles. MAP values were calculated using a standard mathematical formula. Calculated SBP values were compared with systolic hypotension definitions from other sources. Linear regression analysis was applied to create simple formulas to estimate 5th percentile SBP and 5th and 50th percentile MAP for different age groups at the 50th height percentile.
RESULTS: A 9-21% range in both SBP and MAP values was noted for different height percentiles in the same age groups. The 5th percentile SBP values used to define hypotension by different sources are higher than our calculated values in children but are lower than our calculated values in adolescents. Clinical formulas for calculation of SBP and MAP (mm Hg) in normal children are as follows: SBP (5th percentile at 50th height percentile) = 2 x age in years + 65, MAP (5th percentile at 50th height percentile) = 1.5 x age in years + 40, and MAP (50th percentile at 50th height percentile) = 1.5 x age in years + 55.
CONCLUSION: We developed new estimates for values of 5th percentile SBP and created a table of normal MAP values for reference. SBP is significantly affected by height, which has not been considered previously. Although the estimated lower limits of SBP are lower than currently used to define hypotension, these values are derived from normal healthy children and are likely not appropriate for critically ill children. Our data suggest that the current values for hypotension are not evidence-based and may need to be adjusted for patient height and, most important, for clinical condition. Specifically, we suggest that the definition of hypotension derived from normal children should not be used to define the SBP goal; a higher target SBP is likely appropriate in many critically ill and injured children. Further studies are needed to evaluate the appropriate threshold values of SBP for determining hypotension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17273118     DOI: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000257039.32593.DC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  43 in total

1.  Common data elements for pediatric traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the working group on demographics and clinical assessment.

Authors:  P David Adelson; Jose Pineda; Michael J Bell; Nicholas S Abend; Rachel P Berger; Christopher C Giza; Gillian Hotz; Mark S Wainwright
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 2.  Emergency Neurologic Life Support: Spinal Cord Compression.

Authors:  Kristine H O'Phalen; E Bradshaw Bunney; John W Kuluz
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Repeat blood cultures in children with persistent fever and neutropenia: Diagnostic and clinical implications.

Authors:  Rachel L Wattier; Christopher C Dvorak; Andrew D Auerbach; Peggy S Weintrub
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Raised intracranial pressure during CNS infection: what should we do about it?*.

Authors:  Robert C Tasker
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Defining Significant Events for Neonatal and Pediatric Transport: Results of a Combined Delphi and Consensus Meeting Process.

Authors:  A C Gunz; J D McNally; H Whyte; K O'Hearn; J R Foster; M J Parker; S Dhanani
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2016-12-28

Review 6.  Intraoperative neuromonitoring in paediatric spinal surgery.

Authors:  D N Levin; S Strantzas; B E Steinberg
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2019-03-08

7.  Singapore Paediatric Resuscitation Guidelines 2016.

Authors:  Gene Yong Kwang Ong; Irene Lai Yeen Chan; Agnes Suah Bwee Ng; Su Yah Chew; Yee Hui Mok; Yoke Hwee Chan; Jacqueline Soo May Ong; Sashikumar Ganapathy; Kee Chong Ng
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.858

8.  Ten concerns about blood pressure measurement and targets in paediatric sepsis.

Authors:  Matko Marlais; Mark D Lyttle; David Inwald
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Fentanyl and Midazolam Are Ineffective in Reducing Episodic Intracranial Hypertension in Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Timothy P Welch; Michael J Wallendorf; Evan D Kharasch; Jeffrey R Leonard; Allan Doctor; Jose A Pineda
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 10.  Transfusion Decision Making in Pediatric Critical Illness.

Authors:  Chris Markham; Sara Small; Peter Hovmand; Allan Doctor
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.278

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.