Literature DB >> 27759170

Erythrocytapheresis for chronic transfusion therapy in sickle cell disease: survey of current practices and review of the literature.

Shannon Kelly1,2, Keith Quirolo2, Anne Marsh2, Lynne Neumayr2, Alicia Garcia2, Brian Custer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion therapy (CTT) is an integral component of the management of severe sickle cell disease (SCD) and can prevent complications, such as stroke. RBC units can be administered via simple transfusion or exchange transfusion, and erythrocytapheresis (automated RBC exchange transfusion [aRBX]), is increasingly used for CTT. Comparisons of simple and aRBX transfusions are limited, and the current scope of aRBX use is not known. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We administered a survey to define current transfusion practices for CTT and performed a review of the erythrocytapheresis literature. The survey was disseminated to 62 SCD centers, and 31 institutions responded.
RESULTS: Collectively, 1274 of 12,644 patients (10.1%) received CCT, including 929 of 9324 children (10.0%) and 345 of 3320 adults (10.4%). The most common indication for CTT in children was a risk of stroke (86.8%), defined by abnormal transcranial Doppler, previous stroke, or abnormal brain imaging; whereas the most common indications in adults were previous stroke (37.5%) and recurrent/severe pain (29.0%). Simple transfusion was the most common method for children (480 of 919 children; 52.2%) followed by aRBX (344 of 919 children; 37.4%); whereas, in adults, aRBX was more common (180 of 345 adults; 52.2%) than simple transfusion (102 of 345 adults; 29.6%). A smaller percentage of patients received transfusion via manual exchange (7.2% of children and 16.5% of adults) or a combination of methods.
CONCLUSIONS: The current literature review was conducted to summarize reported methods, outcomes, and adverse effects with aRBX. Comparisons between chronic simple and aRBX transfusions were included when possible, and areas warranting further study are highlighted.
© 2016 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27759170     DOI: 10.1111/trf.13800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  5 in total

Review 1.  Transfusion in Haemoglobinopathies: Review and recommendations for local blood banks and transfusion services in Oman.

Authors:  Arwa Z Al-Riyami; Shahina Daar
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2018-04-04

Review 2.  Cardiovascular complications in patients with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Mark T Gladwin
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08

3.  Clinical and genetic ancestry profile of a large multi-centre sickle cell disease cohort in Brazil.

Authors:  Anna B F Carneiro-Proietti; Shannon Kelly; Carolina Miranda Teixeira; Ester C Sabino; Cecilia S Alencar; Ligia Capuani; Tassila P Salomon Silva; Aderson Araujo; Paula Loureiro; Cláudia Máximo; Clarisse Lobo; Miriam V Flor-Park; Daniela O W Rodrigues; Rosimere A Mota; Thelma T Gonçalez; Carolyn Hoppe; João E Ferreira; Mina Ozahata; Grier P Page; Yuelong Guo; Liliana R Preiss; Donald Brambilla; Michael P Busch; Brian Custer
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  Procedural adverse events in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease undergoing chronic automated red cell exchange.

Authors:  Jenna Wade; Marianne E M Yee; Kirk A Easley; Shannon Pahz; Hailly Butler; Patricia E Zerra; Cassandra D Josephson; Ross M Fasano
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Red blood cell exchange for SARS-CoV-2: A Gemini of therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Sean M Hacking
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 1.538

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.