| Literature DB >> 35071055 |
Lilan Sun1, Lang Sun1, Xue Li1, Xinxin Hu1, Xiukun Wang1, Tongying Nie1, Youwen Zhang1, Xuefu You1.
Abstract
The increasing incidence of tigecycline resistance undoubtedly constitutes a serious threat to global public health. The combination therapies had become the indispensable strategy against this threat. Herein, 11 clinical tigecycline-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae which mainly has mutations in ramR, acrR, or macB were collected for tigecycline adjuvant screening. Interestingly, ML-7 hydrochloride (ML-7) dramatically potentiated tigecycline activity. We further picked up five analogs of ML-7 and evaluated their synergistic activities with tigecycline by using checkerboard assay. The results revealed that ML-7 showed certain synergy with tigecycline, while other analogs exerted attenuated synergistic effects among tigecycline-resistant isolates. Thus, ML-7 was selected for further investigation. The results from growth curves showed that ML-7 combined with tigecycline could completely inhibit the growth of bacteria, and the time-kill analysis revealed that the combination exhibited synergistic bactericidal activities for tigecycline-resistant isolates during 24 h. The ethidium bromide (EtBr) efflux assay demonstrated that ML-7 could inhibit the functions of efflux pump. Besides, ML-7 disrupted the proton motive force (PMF) via increasing ΔpH, which in turn lead to the inhibition of the functions of efflux pump, reduction of intracellular ATP levels, as well as accumulation of ROS. All of which promoted the death of bacteria. And further transcriptomic analysis revealed that genes related to the mechanism of ML-7 mainly enriched in ABC transporters. Taken together, these results revealed the potential of ML-7 as a novel tigecycline adjuvant to circumvent tigecycline-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.Entities:
Keywords: Klebsiella pneumoniae; ML-7; combination therapy; resistance genes; tigecycline
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35071055 PMCID: PMC8766836 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.809542
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and MICs of representative antibiotics for the study strains.
| Strains | ST | Breakpoints (S-R) | TGC* | FEP | ATM | IPM | AMK | TOB | CIP | LVX | NIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 | 2-16 | 4-16 | 1-4 | 16-64 | 4-16 | 1-4 | 0.5-2 | 32-128 | |||
|
| 11 | MIC (μg/mL) | 32 | ≥64 | ≥64 | ≥16 | ≥64 | ≥16 | ≥4 | ≥8 | ≥512 |
|
| 1414 | 256 | ≥64 | ≥64 | ≥16 | 32 | ≥16 | 2 | 1 | ≥512 | |
|
| 11 | 64 | ≥64 | ≥64 | ≥16 | ≥64 | ≥16 | ≥4 | ≥8 | ≥512 | |
|
| 11 | 16 | ≥64 | ≥64 | ≥16 | ≥64 | ≥16 | ≥4 | ≥8 | ≥512 | |
|
| 11 | 128 | ≥64 | ≥64 | ≥16 | ≥64 | ≥16 | ≥4 | ≥8 | ≥512 | |
|
| NAa | 32 | ≥64 | ≥64 | ≥16 | 16 | 4 | ≥4 | ≥8 | ≥512 | |
|
| 1035 | 8 | ≤1 | ≥64 | ≥16 | 8 | 2 | ≤0.25 | 0.5 | ≥512 | |
|
| 14 | 8 | ≥64 | ≥64 | ≥16 | ≥64 | ≥16 | ≥4 | ≥8 | ≥512 | |
|
| 1939 | 32 | ≤1 | 32 | ≥16 | 8 | ≥16 | ≥4 | 4 | ≥512 | |
|
| 3160 | 8 | ≥64 | ≥64 | 8 | 4 | ≥16 | 1 | 2 | ≥512 | |
|
| 1697 | 16 | ≥64 | ≥64 | 8 | 8 | ≥16 | ≥4 | ≥8 | ≥512 |
ST, sequence typing; TGC, tigecycline; FEP, cefepime; ATM, aztreonam; IPM, imipenem; AMK, amikacin; TOB, tobramycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; LVX, levofloxacin; NIT, nitrofurantoin.
Breakpoints (S-R): susceptible (S) breakpoint to resistance (R) breakpoint, according to CLSI supplement M100 (31 edition).
*TGC breakpoint was interpreted according to the FDA.
NAa, not available, this strain should belong to a new sequence type (ST).
Mutations of tigecycline resistance genes in the tigecycline-resistant clinical isolates.
| Isolates |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| + (366A367) | + | + | + | + (S209T, T347S, Δ718, 766C767, 775G776, 778T779) |
|
| + (Δ368, 372CC373) | + | + | + | + (S209T, T347S, 747C748, 750C751, 759C760, 765G766, 768T769) |
|
| + (Δ368, 372CA373) | + | + | + | + (S209T, T347S, V388L, 582G583, Δ718, 723G724, V769D) |
|
| + (D367S, A370P) | + | + | + | + (S209T, T347S, 582G583) |
|
| – | + (R29L, A59D, T108A, 192T193, I223V, I265V, V286I, T304V) | + | – | – |
|
| – | – | + | + | + (S209T, T347S, 727T728, 765G766, 790G791) |
|
| + (368G369) | + | + | + | + (S209T, T347S) |
|
| + (Δ368, 372CC373) | + | + | + | + (S209T, T347S, 555G556, 597T598, insertion 573-574) |
|
| + (Q304stop) | + (139G140) | + | + | + (S209T, T347S, A575V, Δ692,718) |
|
| + (Δ368, 372CC373) | + | + | + | + (S209T, T347S, Δ692,718,730, 735, 769G770) |
|
| + (H350N, 372C373) | + (Y341F, V493I, S643P) | + | + (F37L, E591D, Q1178R) | + (S209T, T347S, V389A, E408D, 582G583, Δ718,747) |
Δ, deletion; +, presence of PCR product and no mutations were identified; -, absence of PCR product; bp, base pair.
Figure 1Chemical structures and Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers of ML-7 hydrochloride, tavaborole and tegaserod maleate.
MICs of tigecycline combination with ML-7 hydrochloride, tavaborole and tegaserod maleate for all tested isolates.
| Strains | Drugs | MIC | FICI | Drugs | MIC | FICI | Drugs | MIC | FICI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alone | COMB | Alone | COMB | Alone | COMB | |||||||
|
| TGC | 32 | 2 ( | 0.1875 | TGC | 32 | 8 | 0.75 | TGC | 32 | 4 | 0.375 |
| ML-7 | 512 | 64 | tavaborole | 64 | 32 | tegaserod maleate | 32 | 8 | ||||
|
| TGC | 256 | 2 ( | 0.26 | TGC | 256 | 0.12 ( | 0.13 | TGC | 256 | 0.12 ( | 0.25 |
| ML-7 | 512 | 128 | tavaborole | 512 | 64 | tegaserod maleate | 128 | 32 | ||||
|
| TGC | 64 | 2 ( | 0.16 | TGC | 64 | 8 | 0.375 | TGC | 64 | 4 | 0.31 |
| ML-7 | 512 | 64 | tavaborole | 128 | 32 | tegaserod maleate | 32 | 8 | ||||
|
| TGC | 16 | 2 ( | 0.375 | TGC | 16 | 0.12 | 1.01 | TGC | 16 | 2 | 0.38 |
| ML-7 | 256 | 64 | tavaborole | 64 | 64 | tegaserod maleate | 32 | 8 | ||||
|
| TGC | 32 | 2 ( | 0.3125 | TGC | 32 | 8 | 0.27 | TGC | 32 | 8 | 0.5 |
| ML-7 | 256 | 64 | tavaborole | 64 | 1 | tegaserod maleate | 32 | 8 | ||||
|
| TGC | 128 | 2 | 0.3125 | TGC | 128 | 0.12 | 0.06 | TGC | 128 | 4 ( | 0.09 |
| ML-7 | 128 | 32 | tavaborole | 512 | 32 | tegaserod maleate | 16 | 1 | ||||
|
| TGC | 8 | 2 ( | 0.28 | TGC | 8 | 1 ( | 0.25 | TGC | 8 | 0.5 ( | 0.56 |
| ML-7 | 128 | 4 | tavaborole | 256 | 32 | tegaserod maleate | 32 | 16 | ||||
|
| TGC | 8 | 2 ( | 0.5 | TGC | 8 | 2 ( | 0.5 | TGC | 8 | 0.12 ( | 0.265 |
| ML-7 | 256 | 64 | tavaborole | 64 | 16 | tegaserod maleate | 64 | 16 | ||||
|
| TGC | 32 | 2 ( | 0.3125 | TGC | 32 | 2 ( | 0.19 | TGC | 32 | 4 ( | 0.375 |
| ML-7 | 512 | 128 | tavaborole | 256 | 32 | tegaserod maleate | 32 | 8 | ||||
|
| TGC | 8 | 2 ( | 0.375 | TGC | 8 | 0.25 ( | 0.28 | TGC | 8 | 0.5 ( | 0.56 |
| ML-7 | 256 | 32 | tavaborole | 128 | 32 | tegaserod maleate | 32 | 16 | ||||
|
| TGC | 16 | 2 ( | 0.375 | TGC | 16 | 0.12 ( | 0.51 | TGC | 16 | 0.25 ( | 0.52 |
| ML-7 | 512 | 128 | tavaborole | 64 | 32 | tegaserod maleate | 32 | 16 | ||||
TGC, tigecycline; ML-7, ML-7 hydrochloride; COMB, combination; FICI, fractional inhibitory concentration index. Synergy was defined as FICI ≤ 0.5, indifference as 0.5<FICI ≤ 4, and antagonism as FICI > 4. The bold values mean the fold of reduction (which is a acquired by: Alone/COMB).
Figure 2FIC indices of the combination between tigecycline and each of ML-7 analogs against 11 tigecycline-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates. (A) ML-7 hydrochloride. (B) HA-100. (C) ML-9. (D) Ripasudil hydrochloride dihydrate. (E) Fasudil hydrochloride. (F) Hydroxyfasudil hydrochloride. Synergy is defined as a FIC index ≤ 0.5.
Figure 3Growth curves (A) and time-kill curves (B) of ML-7 and tigecycline alone or in combination against K. pneumoniae 14-R71, 14-R74 and 14-R75. ML-7, ML-7 hydrochloride.
Figure 4Mechanism of ML-7 in combination with tigecycline. (A) Inhibition of efflux pump by ML-7. Efflux pump inhibitor, CCCP, was recognized as the positive control. (B) Increased ΔpH by ML-7 in treated cells. (C) Permeability of the outer membrane probed with NPN. 0.2% Triton X-100 was recognized as the positive control. The normalized fluorescence intensity is the ratio of fluorescence intensity to OD600. (D) Permeability of the inner membrane probed with PI. (E) Total ROS accumulation in K. pneumoniae 14-R75 treated with ML-7 alone or in combination with tigecycline. Rosup was recognized as the positive control. (F) Decreased intracellular ATP levels after the treatment of ML-7. All experiments were performed as three biologically independent experiments, data presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3 (for F, two biologically independent experiments, n = 2). P-values in (A, C–F) were calculated using non-parametric one-way ANOVA. P-values in (B) were calculated using unpaired Student’s t-test. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001. TGC, tigecycline; ML-7, ML-7 hydrochloride; COMB, combination of tigecycline with tigecycline. Units, μg/mL.
Figure 5Transcriptome analysis of K. pneumoniae 14-R75 after exposure to tigecycline or ML-7 alone and in combination for 4 h. (A) Volcano plots of genes after treatment by tigecycline plus ML-7 compared to tigecycline treated cells. (B) Venngram of genes identified in four groups. (C, D) Functional analysis of 358 targeted genes. (E) Heatmap of selected genes related to ABC transporters. Data were presented as means of three biological replicates. TGC, tigecycline alone; COMB, the combination of tigecycline and ML-7; ML-7, ML-7 hydrochloride; Log2FC, Log2 Fold Change.
Figure 6Scheme of the synergy of ML-7 in combination with tigecycline against tigecycline-resistant K. pneumoniae. ML-7 enhances tigecycline activity through two pathways: (1) ML-7 promoted intracellular accumulation of tigecycline via inhibiting the functions of multidrug efflux pump; (2) ML-7 increased ΔpH and lead to perturb the proton motive force (PMF), which subsequently inhibited the functions of efflux pump, decreased the levels of intracellular ATP and resulted in the accumulation of ROS. All of which promoted the death of bacteria. TGC, tigecycline; ML-7, ML-7 hydrochloride. The red arrows mean promotion; blue arrows mean inhibition.