Literature DB >> 35070557

The Ability of Ultrasound Sonography (USG) to Detect Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy With the Gold Standard of IUGR (Parameters by USG Hadlock) as a Diagnostic Criterion.

Zunaira Rafique1, Muhammad Wasim Awan1, Shaghaf Iqbal2, Naila Nasir Usmani1, Mashkoor Ahmad1, Maryam Amjad1, SamiI Ullah3, Hassan Mumtaz4,5,6,7.   

Abstract

Objective To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the placental thickness measured by ultrasound sonography test (USG) in detecting intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) babies in the third trimester of pregnancy, keeping IUGR (by parameters using Hadlock) as the gold standard. Methods and materials This cross-sectional study was conducted at the radiology department of KRL Hospital from August 5, 2020, to October 25, 2021. Informed written consent was also obtained from each patient, and the hospital's ethical committee approved the study. Three hundred and sixty-two (N=362) pregnant women patients knowing of their last menstrual period, age group 20-35 years, BMI usual, and 24 weeks gestation were included. The patient's complete history was taken by clinical examination and then ultrasound was carried out to measure the placental thickness. At 24, 32, and 36 weeks, the thickness of the placenta was assessed. The Hadlock method was used to compute the predicted fetal weight by measuring biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) on the GC Logiq P/6 three-dimensional machine (GE, Tampa, FL). SPSS v 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used to calculate the mean and standard deviation from the collected data. Results A total of 362 patients who presented in the radiology department for antenatal ultrasound in the third trimester were recruited in our study. The mean age was 27.26 ± 4.21 years (20-35 years). In our study, the mean placenta thickness at 24 gestation weeks was 24.55 ± 0.79 mm, at 32 gestation weeks was 31.84 ± 1.34 mm, and at 36 gestation weeks was 35.54 ± 2.78. Thus, ultrasound's sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value to determine IUGR by placental thickness was 86.30%, 86.70%, 75%, and 92%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound incorrectly estimating low placental thickness was 86.40%. Conclusion Between 24 and 36 weeks of pregnancy, placental thickness rises almost linearly. As a result, measuring placental thickness and other factors is critical for estimating fetal age, particularly in the late second and early third trimesters, when the exact duration of pregnancy is uncertain. Placentas that were less than 29 mm thick at 32 weeks and 31 mm thick at 36 weeks were related to higher morbidity, lower Apgar scores, and more nursery admissions.
Copyright © 2021, Rafique et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gestational age; hadlock; iugr; placental thickness; ultrasound

Year:  2021        PMID: 35070557      PMCID: PMC8767181          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  11 in total

1.  Placental MRI in intrauterine fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  M Damodaram; L Story; E Eixarch; A Patel; A McGuinness; J Allsop; J Wyatt-Ashmead; S Kumar; M Rutherford
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome?

Authors:  P G Lindqvist; J Molin
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Placental volume measured by three-dimensional ultrasound in the prediction of fetal alpha(0)-thalassemia: a preliminary report.

Authors:  M Chen; K Y Leung; C P Lee; M H Y Tang; P C Ho
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  2D-Ultrasound and endocrinologic evaluation of placentation in early pregnancy and its relationship to fetal birthweight in normal pregnancies and pre-eclampsia.

Authors:  S Suri; S Muttukrishna; E Jauniaux
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Two-dimensional sonographic placental measurements in the prediction of small-for-gestational-age infants.

Authors:  N Schwartz; E Wang; S Parry
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  Sonographically abnormal placenta: an association with an increased risk poor pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  W D Wan Masliza; M Y Bajuri; M R Hassan; N M Naim; A Shuhaila; S Das
Journal:  Clin Ter       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct

7.  Role of Ultrasonographic Placental Thickness in Prediction of Fetal Outcome: A Prospective Indian Study.

Authors:  Kashika Nagpal; Pratima Mittal; Shabnam Bhandari Grover
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-09-01

8.  Placental weight and birth weight to placental weight ratio in monochorionic and dichorionic growth-restricted and non-growth-restricted twins.

Authors:  Mariângela Alves Souza; Maria de Lourdes Brizot; Sckarlet Ernandes Biancolin; Regina Schultz; Mário Henrique Burlacchini de Carvalho; Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco; Marcelo Zugaib
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Association between PAPP-A and placental thickness.

Authors:  Elaheh Mesdaghi-Nia; Mitra Behrashi; Arezoo Saeidi; Masoomeh Abedzadeh Kalahroodi; Mojtaba Sehat
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd)       Date:  2016-06

Review 10.  Intrauterine Growth Restriction: Antenatal and Postnatal Aspects.

Authors:  Deepak Sharma; Sweta Shastri; Pradeep Sharma
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Pediatr       Date:  2016-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.