Literature DB >> 22331557

Two-dimensional sonographic placental measurements in the prediction of small-for-gestational-age infants.

N Schwartz1, E Wang, S Parry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the utility of two-dimensional (2D) sonographic placental measurements in the prediction of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants.
METHODS: The maximal diameter along the fetal surface of the placenta and the maximal placental thickness were measured at 18-24 weeks' gestation, and the measurements repeated in the orthogonal plane. 'Biometric lags' were calculated as the difference between sonographic gestational age, estimated using each of a number of fetal biometric measurements, and actual gestational age. These variables were analyzed individually and in combination as predictors of birth weight<10(th) percentile (SGA<10) and <5(th) percentile (SGA<5).
RESULTS: 1909 singleton pregnancies were included. Mean placental diameter (SGA<10, P<0.001; SGA<5, P=0.002) and thickness (SGA<10, P<0.006; SGA<5, P=0.065) were significantly smaller in SGA pregnancies. The biometric lags were greater in SGA pregnancies, the lag in abdominal circumference (AC) being the most predictive of SGA (P<0.0001). Multivariable models were significantly predictive of both SGA<10(th) percentile (area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) =0.7404) and <5(th) percentile (AUC=0.7204), the best fitting models including AC lag and mean placental diameter and thickness.
CONCLUSIONS: 2D placental measurements taken in mid-gestation are significantly associated with the incidence of SGA. Biometric lags can improve the predictive ability further. These easily obtained variables should be considered in future efforts to develop a clinically useful predictive model for adverse outcome of pregnancy.
Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22331557     DOI: 10.1002/uog.11136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  10 in total

1.  Macrosomia has its roots in early placental development.

Authors:  N Schwartz; H S Quant; M D Sammel; S Parry
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  In vivo placental MRI shape and textural features predict fetal growth restriction and postnatal outcome.

Authors:  Sonia Dahdouh; Nickie Andescavage; Sayali Yewale; Alexa Yarish; Diane Lanham; Dorothy Bulas; Adre J du Plessis; Catherine Limperopoulos
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Mode of conception does not appear to affect placental volume in the first trimester.

Authors:  Sara J Churchill; Erica T Wang; Marcy Akhlaghpour; Ellen H Goldstein; Dina Eschevarria; Naomi Greene; Matthew Macer; Temeka Zore; John Williams; Margareta D Pisarska
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  First-trimester placental ultrasound and maternal serum markers as predictors of small-for-gestational-age infants.

Authors:  Nadav Schwartz; Mary D Sammel; Rita Leite; Samuel Parry
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Minimally interactive placenta segmentation from three-dimensional ultrasound images.

Authors:  Ipek Oguz; Natalie Yushkevich; Alison Pouch; Baris U Oguz; Jiancong Wang; Shobhana Parameshwaran; James Gee; Paul A Yushkevich; Nadav Schwartz
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-02-22

6.  The Ability of Ultrasound Sonography (USG) to Detect Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy With the Gold Standard of IUGR (Parameters by USG Hadlock) as a Diagnostic Criterion.

Authors:  Zunaira Rafique; Muhammad Wasim Awan; Shaghaf Iqbal; Naila Nasir Usmani; Mashkoor Ahmad; Maryam Amjad; SamiI Ullah; Hassan Mumtaz
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-19

7.  Fully Automated Placental Volume Quantification From 3D Ultrasound for Prediction of Small-for-Gestational-Age Infants.

Authors:  Nadav Schwartz; Ipek Oguz; Jiancong Wang; Alison Pouch; Natalie Yushkevich; Shobhana Parameshwaran; James Gee; Paul Yushkevich; Baris Oguz
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Mode of conception does not affect fetal or placental growth parameters or ratios in early gestation or at delivery.

Authors:  Lauren W Sundheimer; Jessica L Chan; Rae Buttle; Rosemarie DiPentino; Olivia Muramoto; Kerlly Castellano; Erica T Wang; John Williams; Margareta D Pisarska
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Role of Ultrasonographic Placental Thickness in Prediction of Fetal Outcome: A Prospective Indian Study.

Authors:  Kashika Nagpal; Pratima Mittal; Shabnam Bhandari Grover
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-09-01

10.  Ultrasonographic placental thickness versus fetal outcome: A prospective study in Southern India.

Authors:  Gauri Raghunath Shinde; Nitin Kshirsagar; Manisha Laddad; Vaishnavi Shivade
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2021
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.