Literature DB >> 30224837

Role of Ultrasonographic Placental Thickness in Prediction of Fetal Outcome: A Prospective Indian Study.

Kashika Nagpal1, Pratima Mittal1, Shabnam Bhandari Grover2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Placenta is the connecting organ between the mother and the fetus. It supplies oxygen and all the necessary elements for the growth and development of the fetus. In normal pregnancy, the growth of the placenta remains concordant with the growth of the fetus. The sonographic assessment of placenta can give information about the nutritional status of the fetus. It is known that normal placental thickness approximately equals gestational age. It is historically documented that placental weight is one-fifth of the fetal weight and abnormally thin or thick placenta is associated with increased incidence of perinatal morbidity and mortality. However, there are very few studies correlating placental thickness with Neonatal outcome.
OBJECTIVES: To correlate ultrasonographic placental thickness at 32 and 36 weeks pregnancy with neonatal outcome. To propose placental thickness as a simple test for prediction of neonatal outcome.
METHODS: Placental thickness at 32 and 36 weeks was measured by ultrasound, in 130 pregnant mothers with confirmed dates and uncomplicated singleton pregnancy. Placental thickness was categorized as normal (10th-95th percentile), thin (<10th percentile) and thick (>95th percentile) at each stage and was correlated with birth weight and neonatal outcome.
RESULTS: Neonatal outcome was good in women with normal placental thickness (10th-95th percentile) at 32 and 36 weeks and was compromised in women with thin (<10th percentile) and thick (>95th percentile) placentae.
CONCLUSION: Placental thickness at 32 and 36 weeks corresponds well with gestational age and is a good prognostic factor in assessing neonatal outcome. Therefore, placental thickness should be measured in addition to biometric parameters in antenatal women undergoing ultrasound.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth weight; Neonatal outcome; Placental thickness on ultrasound; Thick and thin placentae

Year:  2017        PMID: 30224837      PMCID: PMC6133799          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-017-1038-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  7 in total

1.  Placental thickness in the second trimester: a pilot study to determine the normal range.

Authors:  Anna J Lee; Michael Bethune; Richard J Hiscock
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Placental thickness-to-estimated foetal weight ratios and small-for-gestational-age infants at delivery.

Authors:  Ki Hoon Ahn; Joo Hak Lee; Geum Joon Cho; Soon-Cheol Hong; Min-Jeong Oh; Hai-Joong Kim
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Sonographic markers of fetal α-thalassemia major.

Authors:  Xinyan Li; Qichang Zhou; Ming Zhang; Xiaoxian Tian; Yili Zhao
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Two-dimensional sonographic placental measurements in the prediction of small-for-gestational-age infants.

Authors:  N Schwartz; E Wang; S Parry
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Placental thickness: its correlation with ultrasonographic gestational age in normal and intrauterine growth-retarded pregnancies in the late second and third trimester.

Authors:  Betty M Mathai; Subhash C Singla; Pramod P Nittala; Rajesh J Chakravarti; Julius N Toppo
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-03-12

6.  Correlation between placental thickness in the second and third trimester and fetal weight.

Authors:  Maryam Afrakhteh; Aida Moeini; Morteza Sanei Taheri; Hamid Reza Haghighatkhah
Journal:  Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet       Date:  2013-07

7.  Relationship between Sonographic Placental Thickness and Gestational Age in Normal Singleton Fetuses in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria.

Authors:  K K Agwuna; C U Eze; P O Ukoha; U A Umeh
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec
  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  The Ability of Ultrasound Sonography (USG) to Detect Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy With the Gold Standard of IUGR (Parameters by USG Hadlock) as a Diagnostic Criterion.

Authors:  Zunaira Rafique; Muhammad Wasim Awan; Shaghaf Iqbal; Naila Nasir Usmani; Mashkoor Ahmad; Maryam Amjad; SamiI Ullah; Hassan Mumtaz
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-19

2.  Association of Placental Parameters with Low Birth Weight Among Neonates Born in the Public Hospitals of Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia: An Institution-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Simeon Meskele Leyto; Kusse Urmale Mare
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 3.  Insights into the role of placenta thickness as a predictive marker of perinatal outcome.

Authors:  Xiwen Sun; Jiayu Shen; Liquan Wang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Ultrasonographic placental thickness versus fetal outcome: A prospective study in Southern India.

Authors:  Gauri Raghunath Shinde; Nitin Kshirsagar; Manisha Laddad; Vaishnavi Shivade
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2021
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.