Literature DB >> 35070142

Normative Reference Values for Trunk Range of Motion and Isometric Muscle Strength in Asymptomatic Young Indian Adults.

Gautam M Shetty1,2, Shikha Jain2, Pratiksha Munje2, Anita Bhan2, C S Ram3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine normative reference values for trunk range of motion (ROM) and isometric strength (TIS) in asymptomatic young, Indian adults.
METHODS: Age, gender, body mass index, lifestyle, and dynamometer-based device measurements of trunk ROM and TIS in extension (EXT), flexion (FLX), and rotation (ROT) were recorded and analysed in 80 asymptomatic subjects between 20 and 40 years of age. Correlation analysis was performed to determine factors influencing EXT and FLX ROM and TIS.
RESULTS: The normative reference values for mean trunk EXT, FLX, right ROT, and left ROT ROM were 23° (95th percentile 31.9°), 40.2°(95th percentile 51.5°), 36.8°(95th percentile 57.7°), and 35.4° (95th percentile 55.7°), respectively; and for mean EXT, FLX, right ROT, and left ROT TIS were 118.1 Nm (95th percentile 278.8 Nm), 63.8 Nm (95th percentile 159.4 Nm), 39.9 Nm (95th percentile 113.6 Nm), and 42.8 Nm (95th percentile 108.9 Nm), respectively. The mean EXT (p = 0.0002), right (p = 0.02), and left ROT ROM (p = 0.01), and the mean EXT, FLX, and ROT TIS (p < 0.0001) were significantly greater in males compared to females. The FLX, EXT, and ROT TIS showed significant strong correlation with EXT and FLX TIS. Mean TIS values in Indian subjects were lower when compared to subjects from other countries.
CONCLUSION: This study established normative reference values for trunk ROM and TIS in asymptomatic young Indian adults. These reference values can be helpful to diagnose trunk ROM and TIS deficits, identify subjects at risk for LBP and disability, and individualise rehabilitation treatment in them. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Isometric contraction; Low back pain; Range of motion; Spine; Trunk muscle strength

Year:  2021        PMID: 35070142      PMCID: PMC8748567          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00466-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.033


  29 in total

1.  Inter- and intrarater reliability of a back range of motion instrument.

Authors:  Aimie F Kachingwe; Beth J Phillips
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  How Small Is Big: Sample Size and Skewness.

Authors:  Adina Piovesana; Graeme Senior
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2016-09-21

3.  Diagnostic value of trunk flexion-extension testing in old chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  Thomas Kienbacher; Elisabeth Fehrmann; Richard Habenicht; Christian Oeffel; Josef Kollmitzer; Patrick Mair; Gerold Ebenbichler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention.

Authors:  Jan Hartvigsen; Mark J Hancock; Alice Kongsted; Quinette Louw; Manuela L Ferreira; Stéphane Genevay; Damian Hoy; Jaro Karppinen; Glenn Pransky; Joachim Sieper; Rob J Smeets; Martin Underwood
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Reliability and agreement of isometric functional trunk and isolated lumbar strength assessment in healthy persons and persons with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Authors:  Jonas Verbrugghe; Anouk Agten; Bert O Eijnde; Frank Vandenabeele; Liesbet De Baets; Xavier Huybrechts; Annick Timmermans
Journal:  Phys Ther Sport       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Lean mass, muscle strength, and physical function in a diverse population of men: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Andre B Araujo; Gretchen R Chiu; Varant Kupelian; Susan A Hall; Rachel E Williams; Richard V Clark; John B McKinlay
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Ethnicity-related skeletal muscle differences across the lifespan.

Authors:  Analiza M Silva; Wei Shen; Moonseong Heo; Dympna Gallagher; Zimian Wang; Luis B Sardinha; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.937

8.  Normal functional range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living.

Authors:  Jesse E Bible; Debdut Biswas; Christopher P Miller; Peter G Whang; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2010-04

9.  Isokinetic and isometric muscle strength in a healthy population with special reference to age and gender.

Authors:  B Danneskiold-Samsøe; E M Bartels; P M Bülow; H Lund; A Stockmarr; C C Holm; I Wätjen; M Appleyard; H Bliddal
Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.311

Review 10.  Which specific modes of exercise training are most effective for treating low back pain? Network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Niamh L Mundell; Simone J J M Verswijveren; Scott D Tagliaferri; Helena Brisby; Steven J Bowe; Daniel L Belavy
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.