Literature DB >> 27655971

How Small Is Big: Sample Size and Skewness.

Adina Piovesana1, Graeme Senior2.   

Abstract

Sample sizes of 50 have been cited as sufficient to obtain stable means and standard deviations in normative test data. The influence of skewness on this minimum number, however, has not been evaluated. Normative test data with varying levels of skewness were compiled for 12 measures from 7 tests collected as part of ongoing normative studies in Brisbane, Australia. Means and standard deviations were computed from sample sizes of 10 to 100 drawn with replacement from larger samples of 272 to 973 cases. The minimum sample size was determined by the number at which both mean and standard deviation estimates remained within the 90% confidence intervals surrounding the population estimates. Sample sizes of greater than 85 were found to generate stable means and standard deviations regardless of the level of skewness, with smaller samples required in skewed distributions. A formula was derived to compute recommended sample size at differing levels of skewness.

Keywords:  minimum sample sizes; normative data; psychological assessment; psychometrics; skewness

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27655971     DOI: 10.1177/1073191116669784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assessment        ISSN: 1073-1911


  6 in total

Review 1.  The Efficacy of Acupuncture on Foot and Ankle for Pain Intensity, Functional Status, and General Quality of Life in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kien Trinh; Nikita Belski; Fangwen Zhou; Arul Kuhad; David Luk; Eunjae Youn
Journal:  Med Acupunct       Date:  2021-12-16

2.  Normative Reference Values for Trunk Range of Motion and Isometric Muscle Strength in Asymptomatic Young Indian Adults.

Authors:  Gautam M Shetty; Shikha Jain; Pratiksha Munje; Anita Bhan; C S Ram
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  The Association Between the Number of Neuropsychological Measures and the Base Rate of Low Scores.

Authors:  Javier Oltra-Cucarella; Miriam Sánchez-SanSegundo; María Rubio-Aparicio; Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla; Rosario Ferrer-Cascales
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2019-07-31

4.  Socioeconomic Status, Health and Lifestyle Settings as Psychosocial Risk Factors for Road Crashes in Young People: Assessing the Colombian Case.

Authors:  Andrea Serge; Johana Quiroz Montoya; Francisco Alonso; Luis Montoro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of COVID-19 Vaccination among Adults in Singapore: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Joseph Cheng Yuen Juin; Shaun Loong Seh Ern; Clare Elisabeth Ho Si Min; Ng Kai Jing; Miki Ng Min Qi; Ryan Chee Choon Hoe; Tiffany Chin Xuan Ling; Francis Fong Jia Yi; Goh Song Ling Germain; Kumaresh Natarajan S/O Venkatesh; Sim Zi Ying; Zach Chan Yung Shen; Pek Shayne; Liew Xin Wei; Ong Yan Qing Cherie; Benjamin Wu; Luke Yeo Yu Xuan; Tony Ng De Rong; Celeste Ng Zi Hui; Soon Wei Wen; Bryan Shi Yichong; Ruth Wong Si Man; Sean Tan; Ivan Leong; Celeste Chan Li-Lynn; Tan Jia Wen; Pang Junxiong
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.707

6.  Air Pollution Status in 10 Mega-Cities in China during the Initial Phase of the COVID-19 Outbreak.

Authors:  Crystal Jane Ethan; Kingsley Katleho Mokoena; Yan Yu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.