| Literature DB >> 35068272 |
Huijuan Huang1, Jiannan Lv2, Yonglun Huang3, Zhiyi Mo4, Haisheng Xu1, Yiyang Huang1, Linghui Yang5, Zhengqiu Wu5, Hongmian Li6, Yaqin Qin2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic studies against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection have become one of the important works in global public health.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; IFI27; LASSO regression; coexpression; immune cell infiltration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35068272 PMCID: PMC8786244 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1995624
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Med ISSN: 0785-3890 Impact factor: 4.709
Figure 1.The flowchart of this study.
Figure 2.Synergistic expression behaviour of HIV-associated genes. (A) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes in GPL6947 or GPL10558. (B) Common genes that were up – or down-regulated simultaneously in both sets of DEGs. (C) Clustering tree of coexpression module genes. (D) Eigengene adjacency heatmap of the strength of correlation between modules and clinical trait. (E) Heatmap of correlation between module and clinical phenotype. Red represents positive correlation and blue represents negative correlation. Each row represents a module and each column represents a clinical trait. (F) Module expression changes with time of enrolment after HIV infection. Module expression changes with time of enrolment after HIV infection.
Figure 3.Biological functions and signalling pathways in which module genes participate. (A) Module genes significantly involved in the main up- or down-regulated biological processes. (B) Module genes significantly involved in the main up – or down-regulated KEGG pathways. (C) KEGG in GSEA of module gene involvement.
Figure 4.Persistent changes in genes and pathways after HIV enrolment. (A) Heatmap of gene with persistent up- or down-expression from enrolment to 24 weeks of HIV infection. (B) The box plots of STEM genes in four clusters. (C) Signalling pathways that are consistently up- or down-regulated from enrolment to 24 weeks of HIV infection. E: enrolment; W1-24: weeks at 1, 2, 4, 12, and 24 after enrolment.
Figure 5.PPI network analysis of module genes identifies key genes. (A). Top 100 most connected genes in the PPI network. The larger the node, the greater the degree. (B). Selection of optimal parameter (λ) in the LASSO model. The log(λ) value of 12 is used for further analysis. (C) LASSO coefficient profiles of 12 signature genes. (D) AUC values of the signature genes in the training set. (E) AUC values of the signature genes in the validation set. (F) AUC values of the signature genes in GPL10558. (G) AUC values of important genes. (H) Expression levels of PSMB8 and IFI27 in ART or HIV-positive individuals of GPL6947. (I) Relative expression levels of PSMB8 and IFI27 in blood samples of controls, HIV-positive individuals, and ART patients detected by qRT-PCR. **p Value <.01. Ctrl: controls; ART: antiretroviral therapy. (J) Correlations between key genes and clinical features.
Figure 6.Methylation and expression levels of methylation marks.
Figure 7.Immune cell infiltration levels in HIV + patients. (A) Differences in immune cell infiltration between HIV + and HIV-patients in the four datasets. (B) Differences in immune cell infiltration between ART and HIV + patients. (C) Correlation between immune infiltrating cells and key genes.