Weng Hong Chung1, Yu Jie Lee1, Chee Kidd Chiu1, Mohd Shahnaz Hasan2, Chris Yin Wei Chan1, Mun Keong Kwan3. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Orthopedic Centre of Excellence for Research and Learning (NOCERAL), Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2. Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Orthopedic Centre of Excellence for Research and Learning (NOCERAL), Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. munkeong42@hotmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the perioperative outcome and operative cost of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery between severe and non-severe Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. METHODS: A total of 509 AIS patients who underwent single-staged PSF between 2013 and 2020 were reviewed. Fifty-four severe scoliosis patients (Cobb angle ≥ 90°) were categorized into Gp1, and 455 non-severe scoliosis (Cobb angle < 90°) patients into Gp2. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis using one-to-one nearest neighbor matching and match tolerance of 0.001 were performed. Outcome measures were operative time, intraoperative blood loss (IBL), allogeneic transfusion rate, perioperative complication, length of stay, fusion level, number of screws used, postoperative Cobb angle, correction rate (CR), side bending correction index (SBCI) and operative cost. RESULTS: From the PSM analysis, 35 patients from each group were matched. The operative time was 155.9 ± 41.4 and 130.0 ± 30.3 min for Gp1 and Gp2, respectively (p = 0.004). The IBL was 1349.2 ± 1019.0 and 781.9 ± 325.1 mLs for Gp1 and Gp2, respectively (p = 0.003). Fusion level (12.5 ± 0.8 vs. 11.2 ± 1.3, p < 0.001) and number of screws used (16.4 ± 1.6 vs. 14.6 ± 1.4, p < 0.001) were higher in Gp1. Four perioperative complications were observed in Gp1 compared to none in Gp2 (p < 0.039). Gp1 had larger postoperative Cobb angle (p < 0.001), lower CR (p = 0.005) and higher SBCI (p < 0.001). The operative cost was higher in Gp1 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Severe Lenke 1 and 2 AIS patients had poorer perioperative outcome, higher complication rate, longer fusion and higher operative cost than non-severe AIS.
PURPOSE: To compare the perioperative outcome and operative cost of posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery between severe and non-severe Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. METHODS: A total of 509 AIS patients who underwent single-staged PSF between 2013 and 2020 were reviewed. Fifty-four severe scoliosis patients (Cobb angle ≥ 90°) were categorized into Gp1, and 455 non-severe scoliosis (Cobb angle < 90°) patients into Gp2. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis using one-to-one nearest neighbor matching and match tolerance of 0.001 were performed. Outcome measures were operative time, intraoperative blood loss (IBL), allogeneic transfusion rate, perioperative complication, length of stay, fusion level, number of screws used, postoperative Cobb angle, correction rate (CR), side bending correction index (SBCI) and operative cost. RESULTS: From the PSM analysis, 35 patients from each group were matched. The operative time was 155.9 ± 41.4 and 130.0 ± 30.3 min for Gp1 and Gp2, respectively (p = 0.004). The IBL was 1349.2 ± 1019.0 and 781.9 ± 325.1 mLs for Gp1 and Gp2, respectively (p = 0.003). Fusion level (12.5 ± 0.8 vs. 11.2 ± 1.3, p < 0.001) and number of screws used (16.4 ± 1.6 vs. 14.6 ± 1.4, p < 0.001) were higher in Gp1. Four perioperative complications were observed in Gp1 compared to none in Gp2 (p < 0.039). Gp1 had larger postoperative Cobb angle (p < 0.001), lower CR (p = 0.005) and higher SBCI (p < 0.001). The operative cost was higher in Gp1 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Severe Lenke 1 and 2 AIS patients had poorer perioperative outcome, higher complication rate, longer fusion and higher operative cost than non-severe AIS.
Authors: Pankaj Kandwal; Ankur Goswami; G Vijayaraghavan; K R Subhash; Ashok Jaryal; B N Upendra; Arvind Jayaswal Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2016-06-16
Authors: Lawrence G Lenke; Peter O Newton; Daniel J Sucato; Harry L Shufflebarger; John B Emans; Paul D Sponseller; Suken A Shah; Brenda A Sides; Kathy M Blanke Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 3.468