Literature DB >> 27927520

Staged Anterior Release and Posterior Instrumentation in Correction of Severe Rigid Scoliosis (Cobb Angle >100 Degrees).

Pankaj Kandwal1, Ankur Goswami2, G Vijayaraghavan2, K R Subhash2, Ashok Jaryal3, B N Upendra2, Arvind Jayaswal2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Severe rigid curves present a big challenge to the treating spine surgeon. We evaluated the outcome of staged anterior release and posterior instrumentation for rigid scoliosis.
METHODS: Twenty-one patients with an average age of 14.4 years (range 11-17) having a rounded severe rigid scoliosis (Cobb angle >100 degrees) underwent surgical correction. Six patients had congenital scoliosis, 13 idiopathic scoliosis, and 2 syndromic. All patients underwent anterior release in Stage I with one or more Ponte osteotomies and in Stage II with all pedicle screw instrumentation, and 13 of the patients underwent an asymmetric pedicle subtraction osteotomy at the apex. Patients were assessed for deformity correction, operative time, blood loss, and any complications.
RESULTS: The preoperative Cobb angle of 116.6 degrees (range 101-124 degrees) improved to 74.0 degrees (range 54-86 degrees) after anterior release: 29.4% correction and the final postoperation Cobb angle after posterior instrumentation was 26.5 degrees (range 22-32 degrees), with final 76% correction. The average blood loss in anterior release was 585.95 mL (range 400-980 mL; % estimated blood volume = 19.5%), whereas the mean operative time was 223 minutes (165-315 minutes). One patient had prolonged chest drain and two, basal atelectasis following anterior release. The mean operative time for the posterior procedure was 340 minutes (range 280-420 minutes) and average blood loss was 2,066 mL (range 1,200-3,200 mL). The mean apical axial rotation of 56 degrees (range 26-79 degrees) improved to 28 degrees (range 9-42 degrees) (p < .05). There was loss of motor evoked potential signal in one and hook pullout, superficial infection, and local skin necrosis one case each.
CONCLUSION: The staged approach to the management of severe, rigid scoliosis helps get an excellent correction. Anterior release loosens up the rigid apex and provides with nearly 30% correction so that the extent of the osteotomies in the second stage from the back is substantially reduced, allowing for a final good correction.
Copyright © 2016 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior release; Asymmetric pedicle subtraction osteotomy; Ponte osteotomy; Severe rigid scoliosis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27927520     DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2015.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  9 in total

1.  Predictive factors for correction rate in severe idiopathic scoliosis (Cobb angle ≥ 90°): an analysis of 128 patients.

Authors:  Yuki Mihara; Weng Hong Chung; Siti Mariam Mohamad; Chee Kidd Chiu; Chris Yin Wei Chan; Mun Keong Kwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Long-term experience with simultaneous prone video-assisted thoracoscopic anterior spinal release and posterior spinal fusion in severe rigid pediatric spinal deformities.

Authors:  Chirag A Berry; Viral V Jain; Kedar P Padhye; Alvin H Crawford
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Is detethering necessary before deformity correction in congenital scoliosis associated with tethered cord syndrome: a meta-analysis of current evidence.

Authors:  Kaustubh Ahuja; Syed Ifthekar; Samarth Mittal; Gagandeep Yadav; P Venkata Sudhakar; Sitanshu Barik; Pankaj Kandwal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of operative implications between adolescent and young adult idiopathic scoliosis patients from scoliosis research society mortality and morbidity database.

Authors:  Swamy Kurra; Prisco DeMercurio; William F Lavelle
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-05-24

5.  Planned two-stage surgery using lateral lumbar interbody fusion and posterior corrective fusion: a retrospective study of perioperative complications.

Authors:  Yu Yamato; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Go Yoshida; Tatsuya Yasuda; Tomohiro Banno; Shin Oe; Hideyuki Arima; Yuki Mihara; Hiroki Ushirozako; Tomohiro Yamada; Koichiro Ide; Yuh Watanabe; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Severe Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis had poorer perioperative outcome, higher complication rate, longer fusion and higher operative cost compared to non-severe scoliosis.

Authors:  Weng Hong Chung; Yu Jie Lee; Chee Kidd Chiu; Mohd Shahnaz Hasan; Chris Yin Wei Chan; Mun Keong Kwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Skull-femoral traction after posterior release for correction of adult severe scoliosis: efficacy and complications.

Authors:  Jun Qiao; Lingyan Xiao; Leilei Xu; Zhen Liu; Xu Sun; Bangping Qian; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Pre-operative Halo-Pelvic Traction for Neurofibromatosis Patients with Severe Proximal Thoracic Spinal Deformity: Indications and Early Treatment Outcome.

Authors:  W H Chung; Y Mihara; S S Toyat; C K Chiu; M S Hasan; A Saw; Cyw Chan; M K Kwan
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2021-11

Review 9.  Severe Rigid Scoliosis: Review of Management Strategies and Role of Spinal Osteotomies.

Authors:  Pankaj Kandwal; Govindaraja Perumal Vijayaraghavan; Upendra Bidre Nagaraja; Arvind Jayaswal
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-06-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.