Literature DB >> 24947183

Does delaying surgery in immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with progressive curve, lead to addition of fusion levels?

Jae Hyuk Yang1, Amit Wasudeo Bhandarkar, Barani Rathanvelu, Jin Ho Hwang, Jae Young Hong, Hitesh N Modi, Seung Woo Suh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the changes in the curve extent, pattern and the fusion level in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients who undergo delayed surgery instead of early surgery.
METHODS: Thirty-five immature AIS patients whose radiographs demonstrated an initial primary curve of more than 40° with a subsequent increase of 10° before attaining skeletal maturity with brace were enrolled. The initial and the final radiographs taken before surgery were compared to assess the changes in curve extent, pattern and the fusion levels as recommended by King's, Lenke's and Suk's guidelines.
RESULTS: The average age of 35 AIS patients was 12.7 ± 1.6 years. The time interval between initial and final radiography was 39.3 ± 20.2 months and the degree of progress of the primary curve was 13 ± 9.7°. Fusion levels changed in 33 (94.2%), 33 (94.2%) and 32 (91.4%) patients according to King's, Lenke's and Suk's guidelines, respectively. Curve pattern was changed in 2 (5.7%), 12 (34.3%) and 10 (28.6) patients by King's, Lenke's and Suk's guidelines. The mean number of levels requiring fusion increased from 9.4 ± 2.1 at initial visit to 11.1 ± 1.8 at the final follow-up using King's guidelines, 9.7 ± 2.2-11.6 ± 2.0 as per Lenke's guidelines and 9.1 ± 2.0-11.5 ± 2.3 when fusion was planned using Suk's guidelines (p < 0.001 in all guidelines).
CONCLUSIONS: Delay of surgery in immature AIS patients whose Cobb's angle exceed 40° initially and showing subsequent progression of the curve, of more than 10° can lead to alterations in the curve pattern and the need for increase in fusion levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24947183     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3421-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  27 in total

Review 1.  Curve prevalence of a new classification of operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: does classification correlate with treatment?

Authors:  Lawrence G Lenke; Randal R Betz; David Clements; Andrew Merola; Thomas Haher; Thomas Lowe; Peter Newton; Keith H Bridwell; Kathy Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Abstracts from the 3rd international congress on early onset scoliosis and growing spine, 20-21 november 2009, istanbul, Turkey.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Curve progression in Risser stage 0 or 1 patients after posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  R F Roberto; J E Lonstein; R B Winter; F Denis
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 4.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Farhaan Altaf; Alexander Gibson; Zaher Dannawi; Hilali Noordeen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-04-30

5.  Evolution of the curve patterns during brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Xin Zheng; Xu Sun; Bangping Qian; Tao Wu; Saihu Mao; Zezhang Zhu; Bin Wang; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Authors:  Se-Il Suk; Jin-Hyok Kim; Sung-Soo Kim; Dong-Ju Lim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; Jack C Y Cheng; Aina Danielsson; Jose A Morcuende
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis: a 50-year natural history study.

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; Kevin F Spratt; Kirk K Peterson; Mark J Spoonamore; Ignacio V Ponseti
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-02-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: prevalence and natural history.

Authors:  S L Weinstein
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1989
View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of operative implications between adolescent and young adult idiopathic scoliosis patients from scoliosis research society mortality and morbidity database.

Authors:  Swamy Kurra; Prisco DeMercurio; William F Lavelle
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  Community Care Administration of Spinal Deformities in the Brazilian Public Health System.

Authors:  Mario Bressan-Neto; Carlos Fernando Pereira da Silva Herrero; Lilian Maria Pacola; Altacílio Aparecido Nunes; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Severe Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis had poorer perioperative outcome, higher complication rate, longer fusion and higher operative cost compared to non-severe scoliosis.

Authors:  Weng Hong Chung; Yu Jie Lee; Chee Kidd Chiu; Mohd Shahnaz Hasan; Chris Yin Wei Chan; Mun Keong Kwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.