| Literature DB >> 32349382 |
Faheem Khan1,2, Asim Ghaffar1, Naeem Khan2, Sung Ho Cho1.
Abstract
Non-invasive remote health monitoring plays a vital role in epidemiological situations such as SARS outbreak (2003), MERS (2015) and the recently ongoing outbreak of COVID-19 because it is extremely risky to get close to the patient due to the spread of contagious infections. Non-invasive monitoring is also extremely necessary in situations where it is difficult to use complicated wired connections, such as ECG monitoring for infants, burn victims or during rescue missions when people are buried during building collapses/earthquakes. Due to the unique characteristics such as higher penetration capabilities, extremely precise ranging, low power requirement, low cost, simple hardware and robustness to multipath interferences, Impulse Radio Ultra Wideband (IR-UWB) technology is appropriate for non-invasive medical applications. IR-UWB sensors detect the macro as well as micro movement inside the human body due to its fine range resolution. The two vital signs, i.e., respiration rate and heart rate, can be measured by IR-UWB radar by measuring the change in the magnitude of signal due to displacement caused by human lungs, heart during respiration and heart beating. This paper reviews recent advances in IR- UWB radar sensor design for healthcare, such as vital signs measurements of a stationary human, vitals of a non-stationary human, vital signs of people in a vehicle, through the wall vitals measurement, neonate's health monitoring, fall detection, sleep monitoring and medical imaging. Although we have covered many topics related to health monitoring using IR-UWB, this paper is mainly focused on signal processing techniques for measurement of vital signs, i.e., respiration and heart rate monitoring.Entities:
Keywords: IR-UWB radar; algorithm; fall detection; heart rate; motion detection; respiration rate; sleep monitoring; vital signs
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32349382 PMCID: PMC7248922 DOI: 10.3390/s20092479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Experimental setup.
Figure 2Received signal before and after clutter removal.
Clutter removal algorithms for vital sign detection.
| Clutter & Noise Removal Algorithms | Research Articles |
|---|---|
| Loop Back Filter | [ |
| Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) | [ |
| Kalman Filter | [ |
| Single Delay MTI Filter | [ |
| Averaging Method | [ |
| Pseudo-Bi-Dimensional Ensemble Empirical Mode | [ |
Figure 3Waveforms after clutter removal.
Figure 4The variance of the signal at different slow time indexes.
Figure 5The vital signal in time domain.
Figure 6The frequency transformed version of the vital signal.
Performance comparison of vital sign detection algorithms.
| Vital Sign Assessed | Vital Sign Algorithms | Research Articles | Experimental Setup | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Fast Fourier transform (FFT) | [ | [ | [ |
|
| Ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) and Continuous wavelet transforms (CWT) | [ | 0.2–5m/3 human/ECG | SNR improvement for RR: 7.5 dB |
|
| Wavelet transform | [ | [ | [ |
|
| MTI and Chirp Z-transform (CZT) | [ | 1 m/3 human/ECG | Error rate BR/HR: 1%–2.4% |
|
| Multiple Higher Order Cumulant (MHOC) | [ | 2–7 m/1 human/manual | SNR improvement: 13.8 dB |
|
| HAPA (harmonic path) | [ | 5–15 cm/1 male/pulse-oximeter | Error rate (MSE) for HR: 1.83% |
|
| Spectrum-Averaged Harmonic Path (SHAPA) | [ | 5–15 cm/8 human/pulse-oximeter | Error rate: 16% improvement over [ |
|
| IIR filter | [ | 1 m/--/respiration monitor belt (RPM) | Correlation co-efficient: 0.909 |
|
| Time Domain Processing Algorithm | [ | 0.25–1.25 m/5 human/ECG | Error rate: 1.01%–4.32% |
|
| Time series analysis | [ | 1m/apparatus/-- | Error rate: 1.26% |
|
| Pulse-Doppler signal processing technique | [ | 5–15 cm/13 human/Polysomnography (PSG) | Deviation: 5% |
|
| Maximum likelihood period estimation | [ | 0.3 m/1 human/wearable sensor | Mean Square Error: < −8dB |
|
| Ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) | [ | [ | [ |
|
| Harmonic Multiple Loop Detection (HMLD) | [ | 0.64 m/5 male, 5 female/pulse oximeter (HR), manual chest wall count (RR) | Error rate (RR): 4.95% |
Performance comparison of vital sign detection algorithms for non-stationary subjects.
| Vital Sign Assessed | Vital Sign Algorithms | Research Articles | Experimental Setup | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Fast Fourier transform (FFT), Autocorrelation | [ | 1–2 m/5 humans /ECG | RMSE for RR: 0.006 |
|
| Wavelet, Kalman filter | [ | 1–4.5 m/4 humans/ECG | Error rate: 2.25%–4.6% |
|
| FFT | [ | 70 cm/1 humans/manual | SNR (stationary): 20 dB |
|
| FFT, Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) | [ | 5.4 m/8 humans/ECG | Success rate: RR: 94% |
|
| FFT, distance deviation threshold (for random body motion detection) | [ | 1 m/22-year-old male/microphone | Normal breathing, apnea, macro-motion detection |
Performance comparison of vital sign detection algorithms for in-vehicle monitoring.
| Vital Sign Assessed | Vital Sign Algorithms | Research Articles | Experimental setup | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Location based Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) | [ | Up to 1.5 m (inside car) /2 human/Oximeter | Error rate for only driver HR: 7.34% |
|
| FFT, band pass filter | [ | Inside car/ 3 male, 1 female/manual push button based method | Mean error: 1.06 breathing rate per minute |
|
| FFT, Data fitting method | [ | Inside car/5 humans/ECG, respiration belt | Mean RR error: 0.2–0.7 beats per minute |
|
| FFT, band pass filter | [ | Inside chamber/ 1 human/ECG | SNR: 8.6 dB |
|
| FFT, FIR Kaiser filter of order 600, Correlation method | [ | Inside car/3 humans/3 lead Olimex EKG (for ECG), a BioHarness 3 (RR) | Phase method: 13.1%–22.5% |
Performance comparison of vital sign detection algorithms for through-wall monitoring.
| Vital Sign Assessed | Vital Sign Algorithms | Research Articles | Experimental Setup | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| CWT, background subtraction method | [ | 1–5 m (non-obstructive), 0.8 through the wall/50 cm | SNR: 14 dB |
|
| Raw data, Frequency spectrum | [ | 1 m/1 human/10 cm | Person detection: 100% |
|
| Time domain (slow time signal) analysis | [ | 2.6 m/1 human/wall | Respiratory pattern |
|
| Spectrum analysis | [ | 0.7–2.5 m/1 human/20 cm reinforced concrete wall | Error rate: 0.6% |
|
| IIR band pass, moving averaging filter, advanced normalization method, FFT | [ | 5.5 m/3 humans/… | Detection of RR |
|
| Variational mode decomposition (VMD) | [ | 1.5 m/3 humans/15 cm thick concrete wall | Correlation: 97.6% |
Performance comparison of vital sign detection algorithms for neonates monitoring.
| Vital Sign Assessed | Vital Sign Algorithms | Research Articles | Experimental Setup | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| FFT | [ | 30–45 cm/3 humans (1 man, 1 woman, 1 baby (5 months old) | Sub-centimeter chest moment detected successfully |
|
| FFT | [ | 35 cm/9 babies (age 2–27 days) | Mean bias: 1.7 bpm |
|
| Peak detection method | [ | 60 cm/babies (1–3 years old) | Apnea detected |
|
| FFT, band pass filter | [ | 1 m/1 infant | 1 RR detected at 0.62 Hz |
|
| Fourier Transform analysis | [ | 20–25 cm/male human, 1 infant (7 weeks old) | Continuous breathing and arrhythmic breathing classification |