Literature DB >> 35059770

Age-related differences in hamstring tendon used as autograft in reconstructive anterior cruciate ligament surgery.

Dorit Naot1, Ally J Choi2, Matthew Street2, Madison Pronk2, Alex Zhao3, Ashvin Thambyah3, Ryan Gao2, Jillian Cornish2, Nicola Dalbeth2, Brendan Coleman4, David S Musson2,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The hamstring tendon is the most commonly used autograft material in reconstructive surgeries of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Younger patients have worse surgical outcomes, with a higher risk of re-rupture. We hypothesized that age-related changes in hamstring tendon properties affect the tendon's propensity to rupture when used as an autograft in ACL reconstructions. The purpose of this study was to compare hamstring tendon samples obtained from people aged 20 years or younger to samples obtained from older people.
METHODS: Superfluous hamstring tendon material was collected from 13 young donors (aged 16-20 years) and 17 older donors undergoing ACL reconstructive surgery. Sections of the tendon samples were used for biomechanical testing, structural analysis of collagen fibrils by electron microscopy, and global analysis of gene expression by microarrays.
RESULTS: We found that tendon samples from the older group had lower Young's modulus than the younger group (P = 0.015), whereas the stress to failure was similar in the two groups. We found no difference in the average diameter of collagen fibrils between the two groups. Microarray analysis identified 162 differentially expressed genes (fold change ≥ 1.5, P < 0.05), with overrepresentation of several biological processes, including regulation of adhesion, migration, inflammation, and differentiation (fold enrichment > 2.0, false discovery rate P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The hamstring tendon from younger people has higher stiffness than tendon from older people, and the profile of gene expression in tendon varies with age. These differences may negatively affect the performance of the hamstring tendon in ACL reconstructions in younger people.
© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Anterior cruciate ligament; Autograft; Hamstring tendon; Reconstructive surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35059770     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05285-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  29 in total

1.  Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; J Todd R Lawrence; Ryenn L West; Alison P Toth; Dean C Taylor; William E Garrett
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Factors associated with revision following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of registry data.

Authors:  Richard Rahardja; Mark Zhu; Hamish Love; Mark G Clatworthy; Andrew Paul Monk; Simon W Young
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The time and history-dependent viscoelastic properties of the canine medical collateral ligament.

Authors:  S L Woo; M A Gomez; W H Akeson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients.

Authors:  Brian T Samuelsen; Kate E Webster; Nick R Johnson; Timothy E Hewett; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Age, graft size, and Tegner activity level as predictors of failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft.

Authors:  Przemyslaw M Kamien; Josie M Hydrick; William H Replogle; Linda T Go; Gene R Barrett
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 7.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction best practice: A review of graft choice.

Authors:  Daniel A Shaerf; Philip S Pastides; Khaled M Sarraf; Charles A Willis-Owen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-01-18

8.  Protocol Update for large-scale genome and gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system (v.14.0).

Authors:  Huaiyu Mi; Anushya Muruganujan; Xiaosong Huang; Dustin Ebert; Caitlin Mills; Xinyu Guo; Paul D Thomas
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 13.491

9.  Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction With a BTB Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew W DeFazio; Emily J Curry; Michael J Gustin; David C Sing; Hussein Abdul-Rassoul; Richard Ma; Freddie Fu; Xinning Li
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-15

10.  Contemporary Practice Patterns for the Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in the United States.

Authors:  Nicolas Cevallos; Kylen K J Soriano; Drew A Lansdown; C Benjamin Ma; Brian T Feeley; Alan L Zhang
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.