| Literature DB >> 35057576 |
Andrey Vinicios S Carvalho1, Rafael T Ribeiro2, Luz Elena Durán-Carabali3, Ana Paula R Martini1, Eduarda Hoeper4, Eduardo F Sanches2, Eduardo Luis Konrath5, Carla Dalmaz1,2,4, Moacir Wajner2,4, Carlos Alexandre Netto1,2,3,4.
Abstract
The disruption of redox homeostasis and neuroinflammation are key mechanisms in the pathogenesis of brain hypoxia-ischemia (HI); medicinal plants have been studied as a therapeutic strategy, generally associated with the prevention of oxidative stress and inflammatory response. This study evaluates the neuroprotective role of the Plinia trunciflora fruit extract (PTE) in neonatal rats submitted to experimental HI. The HI insult provoked a marked increase in the lipoperoxidation levels and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity, accompanied by a decrease in the brain concentration of glutathione (GSH). Interestingly, PTE was able to prevent most of the HI-induced pro-oxidant effects. It was also observed that HI increased the levels of interleukin-1β in the hippocampus, and that PTE-treatment prevented this effect. Furthermore, PTE was able to prevent neuronal loss and astrocyte reactivity induced by HI, as demonstrated by NeuN and GFAP staining, respectively. PTE also attenuated the anxiety-like behavior and prevented the spatial memory impairment caused by HI. Finally, PTE prevented neural tissue loss in the brain hemisphere, the hippocampus, cerebral cortex, and the striatum ipsilateral to the HI. Taken together our results provide good evidence that the PTE extract has the potential to be investigated as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of brain insult caused by neonatal hypoxia-ischemia.Entities:
Keywords: Plinia trunciflora extract (PTE); antioxidants; hypoxia–ischemia (HI); medicinal plants; neuroprotection; spatial memory
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35057576 PMCID: PMC8779767 DOI: 10.3390/nu14020395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Experimental Design. From postnatal to adulthood in Wistar rats. PND: postnatal day; HI: hypoxia–ischemia.
Figure 2Full mass spectrum of the extract of Plinia trunciflora showing the compound cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (m/z 449.1088) (A). The tandem mass spectrometry (MS–MS) of cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (m/z 449.1088) from the extract of Plinia trunciflora (B).
Figure 3HI-induced oxidative stress biomarker responses. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, reduced glutathione (GSH) levels, and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity were essayed in the Hippocampus ((A–C), respectively), in the Cerebral Cortex (D–F), and in the Striatum (G–I). * Injury effect (HI vs. control). # Treatment effect (Sal vs. PTE). Sham + Sal (n = 4–5); HI + Sal (n = 4–6); Sham + PTE (n = 4–7); HI + PTE (n = 4–7). Significance was accepted whenever p < 0.05 (* or #), p < 0.01 (** or ##), or p < 0.001(*** or ###) (one-way ANOVA).
Figure 4Interleukin immunocontent level assessment in the right hippocampus 72 h after neonatal HI and representative protein blots. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) levels (A). Interleukins-10 (IL-10) (B). Results are plotted relative to the same sample used in all membranes (expression level considered as 100%) and normalized by α-Tubulin (mean ± SEM). * Injury effect (HI vs. control). n = 4 animals per group. Significance was accepted at p < 0.05 (*) (one-way ANOVA).
Figure 5Representative immunofluorescence images showing NeuN (A) and GFAP (B) staining in the cerebral cortex; NeuN (C) and GFAP (D) staining in the hippocampus 72 h following neonatal HI. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Quantification of the fluorescence intensity of NeuN and GFAP was performed at 400× magnification by using the mean of five randomly selected fields from each brain. * Injury effect (HI vs. control). # Treatment effect (Sal vs. PTE). Sham + Sal (n = 4–6); HI + Sal (n = 4–5); Sham + PTE (n = 4); HI + PTE (n = 4–5). Significance was accepted at p < 0.05 (* or #) (one-way ANOVA).
Open Field and Elevated Plus Maze performance. Data are expressed as means ± SE. * Injury effect (HI vs. control). Sham + Sal (n = 12); HI + Sal (n = 10); Sham + PTE (n = 14); HI + PTE (n = 12). Significance was accepted whenever p < 0.05 (* or #), p < 0.01 (** or ##), or p < 0.001 (*** or ###) (one-way ANOVA).
| Sham + Sal | HI + Sal | Sham + PTE | HI + PTE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Time spent in central zone | 12.76 ± 1.99 | 15.59 ± 2.76 | 16.81 ± 2.49 | 11.46 ± 1.90 |
| Time spent in peripheral zone | 287.2 ± 1.99 | 284.4 ± 2.76 | 283.2 ± 2.49 | 288.3 ± 2.06 |
| Crossing | 114.3 ± 6.74 | 175.2 ± 12.67 *** | 145.4 ± 4.12 | 153.6 ± 7.07 * |
|
| ||||
| Time spent in open arms | 47.33 ± 7.00 | 93.4 ± 13.06 * | 53.5 ± 7.19 | 64.17 ± 5.12 |
| Time spent in closed arms | 189.0 ± 9.74 | 155.1 ± 19.1 | 192.7 ± 9.77 | 154.8 ± 11.71 |
| Ratio time in open/closed arms | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 0.75 ± 0.19 * | 0.31 ± 0.05 | 0.45 ± 0.05 |
| Rearings | 6.41 ± 0.58 | 10.6 ± 1.25 * | 8.42 ± 1.05 | 11.83 ± 1.16 * |
| Head dipping | 2.66 ± 0.46 | 7.6 ± 2.17 * | 3.85 ± 0.62 | 5.41 ± 1.39 |
| * Injury effect (HI vs. control) |
Figure 6Reference spatial memory performance in the Morris Water Maze assessed at adult age. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Average latencies to reach platform during five consecutive days of training (A). Area under the curve of latency to find the platform during training (B). Latency to cross the platform location in the probe trial (C). * Injury effect (HI vs. control). # Treatment effect (Sal vs. PTE). Sham + Sal (n = 12); HI + Sal (n = 10); Sham + PTE (n = 14); HI + PTE (n = 12). Significance was accepted whenever p < 0.05 (* or #), p < 0.01 (** or ##), or p < 0.001 (*** or ###) (one-way ANOVA).
Figure 7Ipsilateral/contralateral volume ratio of the hemisphere (A), the hippocampus (B), the cerebral cortex (C), and the striatum (D). Representative hematoxylin and eosin-stained coronal brain sections (Bregma −3.3 mm) of adult rats (E). Data were calculated by dividing the volume of selected brain structure ipsilateral to the carotid occlusion (right side) by the contralateral volume. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. * Injury effect (HI vs. control). # Treatment effect (Sal vs. PTE). n = 8 animals per group. Significance was accepted whenever p < 0.05 (* or #) or p < 0.01 (** or ##) (one-way ANOVA).