| Literature DB >> 35057040 |
Sherif Ashraf Fahmy1, Noha Khalil Mahdy1, Hadeer Al Mulla1, Aliaa Nabil ElMeshad2,3, Marwa Y Issa4, Hassan Mohamed El-Said Azzazy1.
Abstract
Antimicrobial drugs face numerous challenges, including drug resistance, systemic toxic effects, and poor bioavailability. To date, treatment choices are limited, which warrants the search for novel potent antivirals, including those extracted from natural products. The seeds of Peganum harmala L. (Zygophyllaceae family) have been reported to have antimicrobial, antifungal, and anticancer activities. In the present study, a 2-hydroxy propyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD)/harmala alkaloid-rich fraction (HARF) host-guest complex was prepared using a thin-film hydration method to improve the water solubility and bioavailability of HARF. The designed complex was then co-encapsulated with ascorbic acid into PLGA nanoparticles coated with polyethylene glycol (HARF-HPßCD/AA@PLGA-PEG NPs) using the W/O/W multiple emulsion-solvent evaporation method. The average particle size, PDI, and zeta potential were 207.90 ± 2.60 nm, 0.17 ± 0.01, and 31.6 ± 0.20 mV, respectively. The entrapment efficiency for HARF was 81.60 ± 1.20% and for ascorbic acid was 88 ± 2.20%. HARF-HPßCD/AA@PLGA-PEG NPs had the highest antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli (MIC of 0.025 mg/mL). They also exhibited high selective antiviral activity against the H1N1 influenza virus (IC50 2.7 μg/mL) without affecting the host (MDCK cells). In conclusion, the co-encapsulation of HPCD-HARF complex and ascorbic acid into PLGA-PEG nanoparticles significantly increased the selective H1N1 killing activity with minimum host toxic effects.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35057040 PMCID: PMC8780513 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14010142
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
The chemical shifts (ppm) of HPβCD before and after forming the HARF–HPßCD complex.
| Chemical Shifts (δ, ppm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H-1 | H-2 | H-3 | H-4 | H-5 | H-6 | |
| HPßCD | 4.899 | 3.310 | 3.768 | 3.329 | 3.552 | 3.696 |
| HARF-HPßCD complex | 4.877 | 3.307 | 3.741 | 3.307 | 3.526 | 3.675 |
| Δδ | −0.022 | −0.003 | −0.027 | −0.022 | −0.026 | −0.021 |
Figure 1Phase solubility diagram of HARF in the presence of several mixtures containing successively increasing concentrations of HPβCD.
Average particle size, PDI, ζ-potential, and entrapment efficiency of HARF–HPßCD/AA@PLGA-PEG NPs.
| Formula | Average Size (nm) | PDI | ζ-Potential (mV) ± SD | Encapsulation Efficiency (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HARF | AA | ||||
| HARF–HPßCD/AA@ | 207 ± 2.60 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | −31.60 ± 0.20 | 81.60 ± 1.20 | 87 ± 2.20 |
Figure 2Particle size distribution of the prepared HARF–HPßCD/AA@PLGA-PEG NPs using DLS analysis.
Figure 3(A) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the HARF–HPßCD/AA@PLGA-PEG NPs. (B) Particle size (nm) histogram of the designed HARF–HPßCD/AA@PLGA-PEG NPs generated through employing the image processing program ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Figure 4Time-dependent release profiles of (A) AA and (B) HARF–HPßCD complex from HARF–HPßCD/AA@PLGA-PEG NPs at 37 °C into phosphate-buffered saline.
Bactericidal activity of HARF and HARF–HPßCD/AA@PLGA-PEG NPs against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli.
| Bacterial Strain | Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC in mg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PLGA-PEG NPs | HARF | HARF–HPßCD/AA@PLGA-PEG NPs | |
|
| 0 | 0.5 | 0.025 |
|
| 0 | 0.5 | 0.025 |
Antiviral activity of HARF and HARF–HPßCD/AA@PLGA-PEG NPs against influenza A (H1N1) virus.
| Sample | CC50 (μg /mL) | IC50 (μg /mL) | SI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plain PLGA-PEG | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| HARF | 238.8 | 30.2 | 7.9 |
| HARF–HPßCD/AA@PLGA-PEG NPs | 110.4 | 2.7 | 41.2 |