| Literature DB >> 32689984 |
Lu Zhao1, Zhihong Ji2, Keao Li2, Bo Wang3, Ya Zeng4, Shuge Tian5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyssopus cuspidatus Boriss has been used as an important ethnomedicinal plant for long to eliminate phlegm, relieve cough and as well as having antibacterial, antioxygenation, and antitumor activities. In this study, the polyphenol contents, flavonoid contents, free radical scavenging assay and animal antioxygenation property assay of ethanol extract of H. cuspidatus were measured.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxygenation property; Free radical scavenging; HPLC-DAD; Hyssopus cuspidatus Boriss; Total polyphenol and flavonoid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32689984 PMCID: PMC7370466 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-020-03016-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Med Ther ISSN: 2662-7671
Fig. 1The chemical structure of caffeic, ferulic and rosmarinic acids
The TPC and TFC in ethanol extract of H. cuspidatus in different years
| Compounds | Regression equation | Linear range (mg/ml) | Sample | Contents (mg/g) | RSD (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPC | Y = 0.124X-0.009 | 0.9987 | 0.002–0.005 | 14.198 ± 0.493 | 3.47 | |
| 13.391 ± 0.381 | 2.85 | |||||
| 20.588 ± 0.551* | 2.68 | |||||
| TFC | Y = 11.209X-0.007 | 0.9999 | 0.010–0.060 | 36.669 ± 0.523* | 1.43 | |
| 33.279 ± 0.693* | 2.08 | |||||
| 44.847 ± 1.013* | 2.26 |
Values are presented in mean ± SD, n = 3. * represents the values of different H. cuspidatus sample group are significantly different from each other (P < 0.05)
Fig. 2The HPLC chromatography and UV spectrum of standard and sample. (a represents mixed standard solution and b represents H. cuspidatus ethanol extract)
The quantitative condition of HPLC-DAD
| Compounds | Regression equation | Linear range (mg/mL) | LOD (μg/mL) | LOQ (μg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| caffeic acid | Y = 17,218X + 1.14 | 0.9996 | 0.040–0.242 | 0.259 | 0.746 |
| ferulic acid | Y = 17,487X + 11.40 | 0.9999 | 0.022–0.133 | 0.259 | 0.776 |
| rosmarinic acid | Y = 7728X + 25.16 | 0.9999 | 0.096–0.576 | 0.607 | 1.721 |
The content of caffeic acid, ferulic acid and rosmarinic acid in H. cuspidatus
| Compounds | Contents (mg/g) | RSD(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| caffeic acid | 0.403 ± 0.010* | 2.36 | |
| ferulic acid | 0.141 ± 0.003* | 2.10 | |
| rosmarinic acid | 1.238 ± 0.018* | 1.44 | |
| caffeic acid | 0.451 ± 0.004* | 0.99 | |
| ferulic acid | 0.314 ± 0.002* | 0.60 | |
| rosmarinic acid | 1.296 ± 0.033 | 2.57 | |
| caffeic acid | 0.634 ± 0.004* | 0.66 | |
| ferulic acid | 0.826 ± 0.003* | 0.35 | |
| rosmarinic acid | 1.305 ± 0.008 | 0.58 |
Values are presented in mean ± SD, n = 3. * represents the values of different H. cuspidatus sample group are significantly different from each other (P < 0.05)
Fig. 3Free radical scavenging capacity of VC and ethanol extract of H. cuspidatus in different years. (a represents DPPH free radical scavenging capacity. b represents ABTS free radical scavenging capacity. c represents Hydroxyl free radical scavenging capacity. d represents Superoxide free radical scavenging capacity. Values were means ±SD of three replications. * represents the values of different group are significantly different from each other (P < 0.01))
Fig. 4The activity of SOD, MDA, CAT and GSH-px in serum of NCG, DMG, VCG, LHG, MHG and HHG mice. (a represents the SOD activity. b represents the CAT activity. c represents the GSH-px activity. d represents the content of MDA. Values were means ±SD of eight samples in a group. * represents the values of different group are significantly different from DMG (P < 0.01). ** represents the values of different group are significantly different from DMG (P < 0.05))