| Literature DB >> 35054731 |
Ali Alqahtani1, Bhavana Raut2, Shagufta Khan2, Jamal Moideen Muthu Mohamed3, Adel Al Fatease4, Taha Alqahtani1, Ali Alamri4, Fazil Ahmad5, Venkatesan Krishnaraju1.
Abstract
The novel itraconazole (ITZ) nail penetration enhancing self-emulsifying nanovesicles (ITZ-nPEVs) loaded in carboxymethyl fenugreek gum (CMFG) gel circumvent the systemic onychomycosis treatment. The ITZ-nPEVs were prepared by the thin film hydration technique, and the particle size (PS), zeta potential (ZP), drug content (DC), entrapment efficiency (% EE), deformity index (DI), viscosity, morphology, and physical stability of the ITZ-nPEVs were measured. In terms of nail hydration, transungual drug absorption, and antifungal efficacy against Candida albicans, the chosen ITZ-nPEVs, nPEV-loaded CMFG (CMFG-ITZ-nPEVs) gel, and the commercialized Itrostred gel were compared. The ITZ-nPEVs showed spherical structure with high DC, % EE, low PS and PDI and positive ZP of ITZ ranging from 95.36 to 93.89 mg/5 mL and 95.36-96.94%, 196.55-252.5 nm, 0.092-0.49, and +11.1 to +22.5 mV, respectively. Compared to the Itrostred gel, the novel ITZ-nPEVs exhibited hydration enhancement factor for 24 h (HE24) of 1.53 and 1.39 drug uptake enhancement factor into nail clippings. Moreover, zone of inhibitions for ITZ-nPEVs (27.0 ± 0.25 mm) and CMFG-ITZ-nPEVs (33.2 ± 0.09 mm) against Candida albicans were significantly greater than that of Itrostred gel (22.9 ± 0.44 mm). For clinical investigation on onychomycotic patients, a nail penetration enhancer containing ITZ-nPEV-loaded CMFG gel presents a highly promising approach.Entities:
Keywords: anti-fungal; itraconazole; onychomycosis; self-emulsifying nanovesicles; transungual
Year: 2022 PMID: 35054731 PMCID: PMC8779379 DOI: 10.3390/polym14020325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Composition and characterization of ITZ-nPEVs Batches.
| Batches | Component (% | Drug Content (mg/5 mL of nPEVs) * | % EE * | Particle Size (nm) * | PDI * | Zeta Potential (mV) * | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITZ | Lipid | Cholesterol | ||||||
| S1 | 1 | 4 | - | 95.36 ± 0.31 | 95.36 ± 0.51 | 196.55 ± 0.025 | 0.092 ± 0.03 | +11.1 ± 0.52 |
| S2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 96.59 ± 0.44 | 96.59 ± 0.44 | 221.2 ± 0.056 | 0.19 ± 0.045 | +17.2 ± 0.35 |
| S3 |
|
|
| 98.43 ± 0.32 | 97.22 ± 0.46 | 240.33 ± 0.016 | 0.38 ± 0.01 | +19.1 ± 0.87 |
| S4 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 193.89 ± 0.8 | 96.94 ± 0.70 | 252.2 ±0.019 | 0.49 ± 0.011 | +22.5 ± 0.28 |
* Each value represents mean, n = 3 ± SD.
Deformability index and viscosity of ITZ-nPEVs and CMFG-ITZ-nPEVs formulations.
| ITZ-nPEVs | CMFG-ITZ-nPEVs | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sr. No. | Batches | Deformability Index (mL·s−1) | Viscosity (cP) * | Batches | CMFG ( | Chitosan ( | Viscosity (cP) * |
| 1 | S1 | 1.35 | 0.98 ± 0.02 | G1 | 1% | 1% | 155.7 ± 0.567 |
| 2 | S2 | 0.556 | 1.32 ± 0.015 | G2 | 0.5% | 1% | 116.1 ± 0.85 |
| 3 | S3 | 0.449 | 1.41 ± 0.032 | G3 | 1% | 0.5% | 132 ± 0.737 |
| 4 | S4 | 0.200 | 1.72 ± 0.025 | ||||
* Each value represents mean, n = 3 ± SD.
Figure 1(a) SEM photograph of selected S3 and (b) size-measured vesicles.
Figure 2In vitro release of ITZ from (a) pure drug, S1-S4 ITZ-nPEVs, and (b) CMFG-ITZ-nPEVs (Mean ± SD).
In vitro release kinetics of ITZ with various nPEVs and CMFG-ITZ-PEVs (mean ± SD, n = 3).
| Correlation Coefficient (R2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formulation | Zero-Order | First Order | Higuchi | Hixon Crowell | Korsmeyer- Peppas | Release Exponent ( |
| Pure ITZ | 0.9612 ± 0.48 | 0.7433 ± 0.67 | 0.9715 ± 0.34 | 0.8920 ± 0.19 | 0.8912 ± 0.17 | 0.417 ± 0.35 |
| S1 | 0.9766 ± 0.12 | 0.7466 ± 0.28 | 0.9726 ± 0.21 | 0.8707 ± 0.14 | 0.8865 ± 0.15 | 0.478 ± 0.38 |
| S2 | 0.9874 ± 0.22 | 0.7762 ± 0.19 | 0.9614 ± 0.23 | 0.9101 ± 0.23 | 0.9244 ± 0.15 | 0.588 ± 0.18 |
| S3 | 0.9895 ± 0.16 | 0.7492 ± 0.15 | 0.9788 ± 0.31 | 0.9189 ± 0.16 | 0.9779 ± 0.33 | 0.613 ± 0.43 |
| S4 | 0.9924 ± 0.31 | 0.7756 ± 0.19 | 0.9732 ± 0.24 | 0.9134 ± 0.23 | 0.9584 ± 0.32 | 0.598 ± 0.31 |
| CMFG-ITZ-PEVs | 0.9912 ± 0.34 | 0.7652 ± 0.23 | 0.982 ± 0.16 | 0.9212 ± 0.31 | 0.9712 ± 0.25 | 0.591 ± 0.43 |
Nail hydration study of various formulation.
| Sr. No. | Groups | Formulations | Weight of Nails before Hydration (mg) | Weight of Nails after Hydration (mg) | HE24 (h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Control (group I) | Deionized water | 50 | 49.2 | - |
|
| Formulation (group II) | S1 | 50 | 62.0 | 1.26 |
| S2 | 50 | 68.2 | 1.38 | ||
| S3 | 50 | 75.6 | 1.53 | ||
| S4 | 50 | 72.7 | 1.47 | ||
|
| CMFG-ITZ-nPEVs (group III) | - | 50 | 81.11 | 1.92 |
|
| Marketed gel (group IV) | Itrostred gel | 50 | 52.65 | 1.07 |
Figure 3Chromatogram of (a) S3 batch and (b) Itrostred gel.
Antifungal activity of various formulation.
| Sr. No. | Formulations | Zone of Inhibition * (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control | 5.1 ± 0.12 |
| 2 | Optimized batch (S3) of nPEVs | 27.0 ± 0.25 |
| 3 | CMFG-ITZ-nPEVs gel | 33.2 ± 0.11 |
| 4 | Itrostred Gel | 22.9 ± 0.44 |
* Each value represents mean, n = 3 ± SD.
Stability study of CMFG-ITZ-nPEVs gel.
| Parameters | 0 Month | 1 Month | 3 Month | 6 Month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug Content * | 98.43 ± 0.32 | 98.39 ± 0.25 | 98.35 ± 0.39 | 97.21 ± 0.12 |
| % Entrapment Efficiency * | 98.43 ± 0.32 | 98.39 ± 0.25 | 98.35 ± 0.39 | 98.21 ± 0.12 |
| Particle size * (nm) | 240.33 ± 0.016 | 241 ± 0.47 | 299.25 ± 0.29 | 349.33 ± 0.92 |
| Zeta potential * (mV) | 19.1 | 19.3 | 19.5 | 19.6 |
(* Each value represents mean, (n = 3) ± SD).