| Literature DB >> 35054307 |
Nuno Jorge Lamas1,2,3, Ana Patrícia Rodrigues1, Maria Araújo4, José Ramón Vizcaíno1, André Coelho1.
Abstract
Basaloid follicular hamartoma (BFH) is a normally benign, uncommon, malformative lesion involving the hair follicles, which usually poses challenges in the differential diagnosis with other benign and malignant tumours, especially basal cell carcinoma, due to significant clinical and morphological overlap. Here, we report the case of a 53-year-old male who presented with a mass in the upper left eyelid evolving for one year. The patient had a previous history of total colectomy and an abdominal desmoid tumour within the context of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP), with a documented germline mutation in the Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) gene. The eyelid lesion was biopsied and the histological analysis of the three small tissue fragments received revealed fragments with cutaneous-conjunctival lining displaying a subepithelial proliferation of basaloid nests with peripheral palisading, compatible with primitive hair follicles. There were images of anastomosis between different basaloid nests, which had their connection to the epithelial lining preserved. The stroma had high cellularity and sometimes primitive mesenchymal papillae were evident. Pleomorphism was absent, mitotic figures were barely identified, and no necrosis was seen. The basaloid nests did not have epithelial-stromal retraction nor mucin deposits. A diagnosis of BFH was proposed, which was later confirmed after surgical excision of the whole eyelid lesion. No evidence of carcinoma was present. This case illustrates the main features of the rare benign eyelid BFH. The standard medical or surgical approach of these lesions remains to be firmly established. Nearly nine months after surgical excision our patient remains well without signs of disease recurrence.Entities:
Keywords: basaloid follicular hamartoma; eyelid; eyelid tumour; ocular pathology; ocular region
Year: 2022 PMID: 35054307 PMCID: PMC8774580 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Figure 1A 53-year-old man with a slightly elevated and palpable nodule measuring nearly 10 mm located in the lateral third of the upper left eyelid. A mild conjunctival hyperaemia was associated with the lesion, which had been progressively growing for nearly 1 year.
Figure 2Basaloid Follicular Hamartoma (BFH) of the upper left eyelid (biopsy material). (A,B). The histological analysis of the 3 biopsy fragments received showed fragments with cutaneous–conjunctival lining displaying a subepithelial proliferation of basaloid nests (H&E, 20× magnification). (C). Peripheral palisading compatible with primitive hair follicles was evident. There was preservation of connection of the basaloid nests to the epithelial lining and images of anastomosis between different basaloid nests. (H&E, 100× magnification). (D). The tumour stroma had high cellularity and sometimes primitive mesenchymal papillae were evident. Most of the basaloid nests did not present epithelial–stromal retraction nor mucin deposition (H&E, 250× magnification). (E). Mitotic figures were scarcely identified (yellow circle). Pleomorphism and necrosis were absent (H&E, 250× magnification). (F). The immunohistochemistry study with antibodies for CD34 showed expression in the stromal cells surrounding the tumour and in blood vessels (250× magnification). (G). BCL-2 expression was limited to a few basal cells in the outermost portion of the lesion (250× magnification). (H). CK20 expression was observed in a few cells scattered within the tumour (250× magnification).
Figure 3Basaloid Follicular Hamartoma (BFH) of the upper left eyelid (whole eyelid lesion). In the surgically excised, whole-eyelid lesion, one observed a basaloid malformative lesion centred in the cutaneous–conjunctival transition zone with features analogous to what had been previously described in the biopsy material (Figure 2). A mild foreign body type giant cell reaction was observed in the periphery of the tumour (yellow stars), most likely being associated with previous biopsy procedures. There was no evidence of malignant features and the diagnosis of BFH was confirmed (H&E, 4× magnification).