Lauren M Stanoszek1, Grace Y Wang1, Paul W Harms1. 1. From the Departments of Pathology (Drs Stanoszek, Wang, and Harms) and Dermatology (Dr Harms), University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor. Drs Stanoszek and Wang contributed equally.
Abstract
CONTEXT: - Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common human malignant neoplasm and is a frequently encountered diagnosis in dermatopathology. Although BCC may be locally destructive, it rarely metastasizes. Many diagnostic entities display morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap with BCC, including nonneoplastic processes, such as follicular induction over dermatofibroma; benign follicular tumors, such as trichoblastoma, trichoepithelioma, or basaloid follicular hamartoma; and malignant tumors, such as sebaceous carcinoma or Merkel cell carcinoma. Thus, misdiagnosis has significant potential to result in overtreatment or undertreatment. OBJECTIVE: - To review key features distinguishing BCC from histologic mimics, including current evidence regarding immunohistochemical markers useful for that distinction. DATA SOURCES: - Review of pertinent literature on BCC immunohistochemistry and differential diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: - In most cases, BCC can be reliably diagnosed by histopathologic features. Immunohistochemistry may provide useful ancillary data in certain cases. Awareness of potential mimics is critical to avoid misdiagnosis and resulting inappropriate management.
CONTEXT: - Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common human malignant neoplasm and is a frequently encountered diagnosis in dermatopathology. Although BCC may be locally destructive, it rarely metastasizes. Many diagnostic entities display morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap with BCC, including nonneoplastic processes, such as follicular induction over dermatofibroma; benign follicular tumors, such as trichoblastoma, trichoepithelioma, or basaloid follicular hamartoma; and malignant tumors, such as sebaceous carcinoma or Merkel cell carcinoma. Thus, misdiagnosis has significant potential to result in overtreatment or undertreatment. OBJECTIVE: - To review key features distinguishing BCC from histologic mimics, including current evidence regarding immunohistochemical markers useful for that distinction. DATA SOURCES: - Review of pertinent literature on BCC immunohistochemistry and differential diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: - In most cases, BCC can be reliably diagnosed by histopathologic features. Immunohistochemistry may provide useful ancillary data in certain cases. Awareness of potential mimics is critical to avoid misdiagnosis and resulting inappropriate management.
Authors: Carlos Monteagudo; Rafael Fúnez; Beatriz Sánchez-Sendra; José F González-Muñoz; Gema Nieto; Clara Alfaro-Cervelló; Amelia Murgui; Ronald J Barr Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 6.298