| Literature DB >> 35053891 |
Umile Gianfranco Spizzirri1, Paolino Caputo2, Cesare Oliviero Rossi2, Pasquale Crupi3, Marilena Muraglia4, Vittoria Rago1, Rocco Malivindi1, Maria Lisa Clodoveo3, Donatella Restuccia1, Francesca Aiello1.
Abstract
Olive mill wastewater, a high polyphenols agro-food by-product, was successfully exploited in an eco-friendly radical process to synthesize an antioxidant macromolecule, usefully engaged as a functional ingredient to prepare functional puddings. The chemical composition of lyophilized olive mill wastewaters (LOMW) was investigated by HPLC-MS/MS and 1H-NMR analyses, while antioxidant profile was in vitro evaluated by colorimetric assays. Oleuropein aglycone (5.8 μg mL-1) appeared as the main compound, although relevant amounts of an isomer of the 3-hydroxytyrosol glucoside (4.3 μg mL-1) and quinic acid (4.1 μg mL-1) were also detected. LOMW was able to greatly inhibit ABTS radical (IC50 equal to 0.019 mg mL-1), displaying, in the aqueous medium, an increase in its scavenger properties by almost one order of magnitude compared to the organic one. LOMW reactive species and tara gum chains were involved in an eco-friendly grafting reaction to synthesize a polymeric conjugate that was characterized by spectroscopic, calorimetric and toxicity studies. In vitro acute oral toxicity was tested against 3T3 fibroblasts and Caco-2 cells, confirming that the polymers do not have any effect on cell viability at the dietary use concentrations. Antioxidant properties of the polymeric conjugate were also evaluated, suggesting its employment as a thickening agent, in the preparation of pear puree-based pudding. High performance of consistency and relevant antioxidants features over time (28 days) were detected in the milk-based foodstuff, in comparison with its non-functional counterparts, confirming LOWM as an attractive source to achieve high performing functional foods.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant features; olive mill wastewater; polyphenols; pudding; rheological properties; tara gum
Year: 2022 PMID: 35053891 PMCID: PMC8774902 DOI: 10.3390/foods11020158
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Identified polyphenol compound in LOMW (in μg mL−1). Data represent mean ± RSD (n = 3).
| Compound | RT (min) | LOMW |
|---|---|---|
| Verbascoside residue | 1.475 | 0.71 ± 0.06 |
| 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol | 1.515 | 0.185 ± 0.017 |
| Quinic acid | 1.773 | 4.1±0.4 |
| 3-hydroxytyrosol glucoside isomers 1 | 2.245 | 4.3 ± 0.4 |
| 3-hydroxytyrosol glucoside isomers 2 | 2.470 | 2.9 ± 0.3 |
| Dimer 407 | 2.610 | 1.56 ± 0.14 |
| 3-hydroxytyrosol | 2.957 | 0.092 ± 0.008 |
| Decarboxymethyl-elenolic acid derivative | 3.542 | 1.55 ± 0.14 |
| Hydroxylated product of dialdhydic form of decarboxymethyl elenolic acid | 4.428 | 3.3 ± 0.3 |
| Caffeic acid | 7.996 | 1.91 ± 0.17 |
| Decarboxymethyl-elenolic acid (HyEDA) | 8.075 | 0.27 ± 0.02 |
| Oleuropein aglycone derivative | 8.124 | 5.8 ± 0.5 |
| 10.798 | 2.13 ± 0.19 |
RT = retention time; LOMW = Lyophilized olive mill wastewater.
Figure 11H-NMR of 16.7 mg of LOMW sample in 0.6 μL of D2O.
Characterization of LOMW by 1H-NMR spectroscopy.
| Compound | Assignment | Chemical Shift (ppm) |
|---|---|---|
| Verbascoside | OH-18; OH-17 | s 9.21; 4.61 |
| Verbascoside | O-CH-O | d 5.23 |
| Sugar residue of glycosides | CH-OH | m 4.17–3.12 |
| Hydroxythyrosol | Ph-CH2- | 2.73 |
| Hydroxythyrosol | CH2-O | 3.76 |
| Oleuropein | CH3 | s 3.86 |
| Oleuropein | Enantiotopic CH2-OH | m 3.42 |
| Caffeic acid | CH2=CH2 | dd 6.05–7.15 |
| Quinic acid | Enantiotopic CH2-CH | 2.27–1.86 |
Antioxidant characterization of LOMW. Data represent mean ± RSD (n = 3).
| Sample | APG | PAC | FC | AC | TAC | IC50 (mg mL−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH Radical | ABTS Radical | ||||||
| LOMW | 75.0 ± 0.7 | 50.8 ± 0.4 | 34.0 ± 0.4 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 1.10 ± 0.05 | 0.095 ± 0.003 | 0.019 ± 0.001 |
LOMW = Lyophilized olive mill wastewater; APG = Available phenolic groups; PAC = Phenolic acids content; FC = Flavonoid content; AC = Anthocyanin content; TAC = Total antioxidant activity; DPPH = 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical; ABTS = 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazolin-6-sulphonic radical; CT = catechin.
Figure 2Panel (A): 1H-NMR spectrum of BTG; Panel (B): 1HNMR spectrum of PLOMW. In the panel (B), the signal at 5.029 ppm belongs to H1 of α-D-galactopyranose which in the panel (A) collapsed into the D2O signal.
Figure 3Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) of PLOMW, BTG and CTG.
Enthalpy and temperature values of the polymers and commercial tare rubber peaks.
| Sample | T Center Peak 1 | T Center Peak 2 | Enthalpy Peak 1 | Enthalpy Peak 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLOMW | 141.0 | 311.8 | 125.4 | −154.3 |
| BTG | 137.7 | 291.4 | 76.0 | −11.6 |
| CTG | 100.4 | 302.6 | 261.4 | −83.4 |
PLOMW = Polymer conjugate lyophilized olive mill wastewater and tara gum; BTG = Blank tara gum; CTG = commercial tara gum.
Figure 43T3 cells viability (%) measured through NRU cytotoxicity assay upon treatment with increased concentrations of BGT and PLOMW (mg/mL). Each column represents the mean + SD of 3 wells/group.
Figure 5Effect of BTG and PLOMW on Caco-2 cells viability.
Figure 6Muco-adhesion of BTG and PLOMW determined as reduction (%) of lectin binding on Caco-2 cells at different concentrations; *** p < 0.001 vs. control.
Total polyphenols, phenolic acid contents and antioxidant activity of the conjugate polymer. Data represent mean ± RSD (n = 3).
| Sample | APG | PAC | TAC | IC50 (mg mL−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH Radical | ABTS Radical | ||||
| PLOMW | 16.3 ± 0.5 | 15.7 ± 0.4 | 2.26 ± 0.11 | 0.322 ± 0.005 | 0.106 ± 0.005 |
| BTG | - | - | - | - | - |
PLOMW = Tara gum grafted with lyophilized olive mill wastewater; APG = Available phenolic groups; PAC = Phenolic acids content; TAC = Total antioxidant activity; DPPH = 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical; ABTS = 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazolin-6-sulphonic radical; CT = catechin.
Total polyphenols, phenolic acid contents and antioxidant activity of puddings based on PLOMW and CTG. Data represent mean ± RSD (n = 3).
| Time | Pudding | APG | PAC | IC50 (mg mL−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABTS Radical | ||||
| 0 | PPLOMW | 0.220 ± 0.009 a | 0.261 ± 0.011 a | 0.0060 ± 0.0003 a |
| PCTG | 0.113 ± 0.005 b | 0.244 ± 0.009 b | 0.0324 ± 0.0011 b | |
| 7 | PPLOMW | 0.193 ± 0.007 c | 0.136 ± 0.005 c | 0.0082 ± 0.0003 c |
| PCTG | 0.101 ± 0.004 d | 0.070 ± 0.002 d | 0.0345 ± 0.0015 b | |
| 14 | PPLOMW | 0.194 ± 0.006 c | 0.075 ± 0.002 e | 0.0118 ± 0.0005 d |
| PCTG | 0.089 ± 0.003 d | 0.056 ± 0.002 f | 0.0397 ± 0.0018 e | |
| 28 | PPLOMW | 0.196 ± 0.006 c | 0.062 ± 0.002 g | 0.0124 ± 0.0006 d |
| PCTG | 0.080 ± 0.002 e | 0.042 ± 0.001 h | 0.0453 ± 0.0021 f |
PPLOMW = Pudding based on tara gum grafted with lyophilized olive mill wastewater; PCTG = Pudding based on commercial tara gum; APG = Available phenolic groups; PAC = Phenolic acids content; ABTS = 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazolin-6-sulphonic radical; CT = catechin. Different letters express significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 7IC50 trend as function of the time of PPLOMW and PCTG.
Frequency sweep test for PPLOMW food matrices and PCGT over time.
| Sample | A ± 100 | z ± 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 °C PCGT (t = 28 days) | 8800 | 18 |
| 5 °C PCGT (t = 14 days) | 8200 | 12 |
| 5 °C PCGT (t = 7 days) | 5600 | 11 |
| 5 °C PCGT (t = 0 days) | 2800 | 11 |
| 25 °C PCGT (t = 28 days) | 7200 | 45 |
| 25 °C PCGT (t = 14 days) | 7300 | 12 |
| 25 °C PCGT (t = 7 days) | 4800 | 11 |
| 25 °C PCGT (t = 0 days) | 2000 | 11 |
| 5 °C PPLOMW (t = 28 days) | 9600 | 18 |
| 5 °C PPLOMW (t = 14 days) | 8900 | 10 |
| 5 °C PPLOMW (t = 7 days) | 5100 | 11 |
| 5 °C PPLOMW (t = 0 days) | 3400 | 14 |
| 25 °C PPLOMW (t = 28 days) | 8200 | 32 |
| 25 °C PPLOMW (t = 14 days) | 7200 | 12 |
| 25 °C PPLOMW (t = 7 days) | 4400 | 12 |
| 25 °C PPLOMW (t = 0 days) | 1100 | 7 |
PPLOMW = Pudding by polymer conjugate; PCTG = pudding by commercial tara gum.
Figure 8Time Cure test for the PCGT (A) and PPLOMW (B) food matrix over time (weeks).