| Literature DB >> 35053138 |
Vladimir Kanygin1, Aleksandr Kichigin1, Alexander Zaboronok1,2, Anna Kasatova3, Elena Petrova4, Alphiya Tsygankova1,5, Evgenii Zavjalov1,6, Bryan J Mathis7, Sergey Taskaev3,8.
Abstract
(1) Background: accelerator-based neutron sources are a new frontier for BNCT but many technical issues remain. We aimed to study such issues and results in larger-animal BNCT (cats and dogs) with naturally occurring, malignant tumors in different locations as an intermediate step in translating current research into clinical practice. (2)Entities:
Keywords: accelerator-based neutron source; boron neutron capture therapy; malignant tumors; veterinary medicine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35053138 PMCID: PMC8773183 DOI: 10.3390/biology11010138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biology (Basel) ISSN: 2079-7737
Data on gender, species, age, localization and type of tumors in animals participating in the study.
| N | Nickname | Species | Age | Tumor Localization | Histological |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daya | dog | 12 | soft tissue of the facial skull | osteosarcoma |
| 2 | Perchik | cat | 4 | mammary gland, frontal bone | carcinoma |
| 3 | Kira | cat | 6 | soft tissue of the back | fibrosarcoma |
| 4 | Kapa | dog | 10 | nasal cavity | - |
| 5 | Sabrina | cat | unknown | nasal meatus (passage) | lymphoma |
| 6 | Pushok | cat | 8 | nose and upper lip area soft tissues | squamous cell carcinoma |
| 7 | Seledka | cat | 4 | soft tissue of the thigh | mesenchymal tumor |
| 8 | Fenya | cat | 13 | trapezius and rhomboid muscles | fibrosarcoma |
| 9 | Lucky | cat | 5 | hyoid area | - |
| 10 | Shon | dog | 11 | upper jaw, hard palate | fibrosarcoma |
Parameters used for irradiation dose calculation.
| Proton Beam | Dose Rates, Gy/mC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thermal Neutrons | Fast | Boron-Related for 1 ppm | Photons | |
| Tumor | ||||
| 2.05 | 3.94 × 10−5 | 1.41 × 10−5 | 1.91 × 10−5 | 3.98 × 10−4 |
| 2.10 | 5.07 × 10−5 | 2.58 × 10−5 | 2.45 × 10−5 | 5.08 × 10−4 |
| Surrounding healthy tissues (brain) | ||||
| 2.05 | 5.22 × 10−6 | 9.42 × 10−7 | 2.52 × 10−6 | 1.20 × 10−4 |
| 2.10 | 6.75 × 10−6 | 1.86 × 10−6 | 3.26 × 10−6 | 1.52 × 10−4 |
| Skin | ||||
| 2.05 | 4.46 × 10−5 | 3.96 × 10−5 | 2.17 × 10−5 | 3.74 × 10−4 |
| 2.10 | 5.61 × 10−5 | 6.84 × 10−5 | 2.73 × 10−5 | 4.67 × 10−4 |
The calculations were carried out for the following parameters: irradiated area at a distance of 1 cm from the target, tumor located at a depth of 2 to 6 cm with a volume of 6 × 3 × 3 cm.
Data on the concentration of boron in the blood and parameters of irradiation in animals participating in the study.
| N | Nickname | Species | Boron | Irradiation Parameters | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Energy (MeV) | Current (mA) | Current | Neutron | Tumor Dose (Gy-eq) | Skin Dose (Gy-eq) | |||
| 1 | Daya | dog | 149 | 119 | 2.1 | 2 | 3.3 | 1.95 | 42.1 | 14.5 |
| 2 | Perchik | cat | 138 | 98 | 2.05 | 2.6 | 4 | 1.79 | 39.5 | 13.3 |
| 3 | Kira | cat | 99 | 74 | 2.05 | 2.6 | 4 | 1.79 | 39.5 | 13.3 |
| 4 | Kapa | dog | 99 | 65 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 4.4 | 2.60 | 56.2 | 19.3 |
| 5 | Sabrina | cat | 60 | 32 | 2.05 | 1.8 | 4.4 | 1.97 | 39.5 | 13.3 |
| 6 | Pushok | cat | 80 | 50 | 2.05 | 1.8 | 4.4 | 1.97 | 39.5 | 13.3 |
| 7 | Seledka | cat | 120 | 59 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 3.9 | 2.31 | 49.8 | 17.1 |
| 8 | Fenya | cat | 167 | 92 | 2.05 | 1.8 | 4 | 1.79 | 39.5 | 13.3 |
| 9 | Lucky | cat | 75 | 44 | 2.05 | 1.8 | 4 | 1.79 | 39.5 | 13.3 |
| 10 | Shon | dog | 109 | 44 | 2.1 | 2 | 4 | 2.37 | 51 | 17.6 |
The irradiation doses are total absorbed doses. Neutron fluence represents total number of neutrons generated in each session. Neutron fluence calculations based on Lee et al. (1999) [90]. The actual neutron fluence corresponds to the calculated one [82].
Figure 1A dog named “Daya”. (A)—CT of the head before irradiation. (B)—positioning of the animal during the irradiation session. (C)—CT of the head 3 months after irradiation.
Figure 2A cat named “Perchik”. (A)—CT of the head, chest and abdomen before irradiation. (B)—positioning of the animal during the irradiation session. (C)—CT of the head 2 months after irradiation.
Figure 3A cat named “Kira”. (A)—CT scan of the chest cavity, tumor of the soft tissues of the back before surgical treatment. (B)—condition after surgical treatment. (C)—Recurrent tumor of the soft tissues of the back. (D)—positioning of the animal during the repeated irradiation session.
Figure 4A dog named “Capa”. (A)—CT of the tumor before irradiation. (B)—positioning of the animal during the irradiation session. (C)—type of tumor before irradiation. (D)—Tumor reduction according to CT data after irradiation. (E)—tumor dynamics 1, 2, and 3 weeks after irradiation.
Figure 5A cat named “Sabrina”. (A)—positioning of the animal during the irradiation session. (B)—The state of the animal one week after irradiation.
Figure 6A cat named “Pushok”. (A)—Tumor on CT scan before irradiation. (B)—preparation of the animal for irradiation. (C)—positioning of the animal during the irradiation session. (D)—dynamics of changes in the size of the formation one, two, and six weeks after irradiation.
Figure 7A cat named “Seledka”. (A)—MRI of soft tissues before irradiation. (B)—positioning of the animal during the irradiation session. (C)—CT of soft tissues three weeks after irradiation.
Figure 8A cat named “Fenya”. (A)—CT of soft tissues before irradiation. (B)—positioning of the animal during the irradiation session.
Figure 9A cat named “Lucky”. (A)—CT of soft tissues before irradiation. (B)—the appearance of the tumor. (C)—positioning of the animal during the irradiation session.