Literature DB >> 1790397

Bone mineral density in patients with cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur.

E Vega1, C Mautalen, H Gómez, A Garrido, L Melo, A O Sahores.   

Abstract

The bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur, spine and radius shaft was determined in 75 women with atraumatic fractures of the proximal femur (FXf) (average age: 70.1 +/- 9.6 years) and 51 controls of similar age. Fractures were classified as either cervical (n = 36) or trochanteric (n = 39) on the basis of radiographic and surgical finding. The BMD of spine and proximal femur was determined by dual-photon absorptiometry (Lunar DP3) and the BMD of the radius shaft by single photon absorptiometry. The BMD of patients with FXf was significantly decreased over all skeletal sites compared to controls of similar age. No significant correlation was found between age and the BMD of the femoral neck in patients with FXf. Patients with trochanteric FXf were older and thinner (average: age, 72.9 +/- 9.4 years; weight, 53.1 +/- 7.8 kg) compared with patients with cervical fractures (age, 67.2 +/- 8.9 years; weight, 59.3 +/- 8.3 kg). Likewise the BMD of trochanteric FXf was lower at all measured sites: femoral neck, 0.548 +/- 0.066 g/cm2 vs 0.624 +/- 0.055 g/cm2 (P less than 0.001); L2-L4, 0.799 +/- 0.115 g/cm2 vs 0.925 +/- 0.106 g/cm2 (P less than 0.001); radius shaft, 0.454 +/- 0.057 g/cm2 vs 0.502 +/- 0.083 g/cm2 (P less than 0.05). Of the patients with trochanteric fractures 66% had concomitant vertebral fractures, while this occurred in only 28% of the patients with cervical fractures (P (Fisher) = 0.0007). In summary, females with trochanteric FXf are older, thinner, have less bone mass in all measured sites and suffer with a significantly greater frequency of vertebral fractures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1790397     DOI: 10.1007/bf01880448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  32 in total

1.  The incidence of osteoporosis in patients with femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  J STEVENS; P A FREEMAN; B E NORDIN; E BARNETT
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1962-08

2.  Comparison of bone mineral density in both hips.

Authors:  J Balseiro; F H Fahey; H A Ziessman; T V Le
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Increase in the incidence of hip fractures and of the ratio of trochanteric to cervical hip fractures in Belgium.

Authors:  C Nagant de Deuxchaisnes; J P Devogelaer
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Bone mineral content of femoral bone and the lumbar spine measured in women with fracture of the femoral neck by dual photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  H Bohr; O Schaadt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; E Seeman; K P Offord; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; K A Johnson; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Osteoporosis and proximal femoral fractures in the female elderly of Jerusalem.

Authors:  M Makin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  An analysis of bone structure in patients with hip fracture.

Authors:  P J Uitewaal; P Lips; J C Netelenbos
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1987-10

8.  Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women.

Authors:  S L Hui; C W Slemenda; C C Johnston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Fractured neck of femur in the elderly: an attempt to identify patients at risk.

Authors:  R Wootton; P J Brereton; M B Clark; R Hesp; H M Hodkinson; L Klenerman; J Reeve; G Slavin; M Tellez-Yudilevich
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 6.124

10.  Changes in bone mass and fracture type in patients with hip fractures. A comparison between the 1950s and the 1980s in Malmö, Sweden.

Authors:  I Sernbo; O Johnell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  26 in total

1.  Comparison of femoral morphology and bone mineral density between femoral neck fractures and trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Yuki Maeda; Nobuhiko Sugano; Masanobu Saito; Kazuo Yonenobu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Age-related hip fractures in men: clinical spectrum and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  G Poór; E J Atkinson; D G Lewallen; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Differences in exposure to stimulatory and inhibitory components of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system in patients with femoral neck versus trochanteric fracture.

Authors:  S Boonen; D Vanderschueren; K Venken; P Geusens; P Haentjens; S Mohan; D J Baylink; R Bouillon
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.668

4.  Changing proximal femoral geometry in north east Scotland: an osteometric study.

Authors:  R A Duthie; M F Bruce; J D Hutchison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-16

5.  Hip fracture types in men and women change differently with age.

Authors:  David A Tanner; Marita Kloseck; Richard G Crilly; Bert Chesworth; Jason Gilliland
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Risk factors for hip fractures in a middle-aged population: a study of 33,000 men and women.

Authors:  Anna H Holmberg; Olof Johnell; Peter M Nilsson; Jan-Ake Nilsson; Göran Berglund; Kristina Akesson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis with vitamin D analogues.

Authors:  J C Gallagher
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  When bone mass fails to predict bone failure.

Authors:  S M Ott
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Epidemiology of hip fractures in an urban population of central Argentina.

Authors:  A Bagur; C Mautalen; Z Rubin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with hip fractures: which technique discriminates fracture risk.

Authors:  A Stewart; D M Reid; R W Porter
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.