| Literature DB >> 35050157 |
Khushman Taunk1, Priscilla Porto-Figueira2, Jorge A M Pereira2, Ravindra Taware1, Nattane Luíza da Costa3, Rommel Barbosa3, Srikanth Rapole1, José S Câmara2,4.
Abstract
The urinary volatomic profiling of Indian cohorts composed of 28 lung cancer (LC) patients and 27 healthy subjects (control group, CTRL) was established using headspace solid phase microextraction technique combined with gas chromatography mass spectrometry methodology as a powerful approach to identify urinary volatile organic metabolites (uVOMs) to discriminate among LC patients from CTRL. Overall, 147 VOMs of several chemistries were identified in the intervention groups-including naphthalene derivatives, phenols, and organosulphurs-augmented in the LC group. In contrast, benzene and terpenic derivatives were found to be more prevalent in the CTRL group. The volatomic data obtained were processed using advanced statistical analysis, namely partial least square discriminative analysis (PLS-DA), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) methods. This resulted in the identification of nine uVOMs with a higher potential to discriminate LC patients from CTRL subjects. These were furan, o-cymene, furfural, linalool oxide, viridiflorene, 2-bromo-phenol, tricyclazole, 4-methyl-phenol, and 1-(4-hydroxy-3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methyl-3-morpholinopropan-1-one. The metabolic pathway analysis of the data obtained identified several altered biochemical pathways in LC mainly affecting glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, pyruvate metabolism, and fatty acid biosynthesis. Moreover, acetate and octanoic, decanoic, and dodecanoic fatty acids were identified as the key metabolites responsible for such deregulation. Furthermore, studies involving larger cohorts of LC patients would allow us to consolidate the data obtained and challenge the potential of the uVOMs as candidate biomarkers for LC.Entities:
Keywords: GC-qMS; HS-SPME; lung cancer (LC) biomarkers; volatile organic metabolites (VOMs)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35050157 PMCID: PMC8780352 DOI: 10.3390/metabo12010036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Figure 1Estimated number of LC new cases in 2020 in both sexes and all ages (A) and estimated number of deaths (B) (data source: Globocan2020 [1]).
Characterisation of the subjects recruited in terms of number, age, gender, and smoking habits.
| Subject Variables | Control Subjects (CTRL) | LC Patients |
|---|---|---|
| Number | 27 | 28 * |
| Mean age (range) | 36.1 (25–52) | 55.5 (27–73) |
| Gender | 16 male, 11 female | 18 male, 9 female |
| Smokers | 9 | 12 |
Legend: LC—lung cancer patients, * LC subtypes and their counts: metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung = 12; non-small cell lung carcinoma = 6; metastatic lung carcinoma = 5; squamous cell carcinoma of lung = 3, alveolar carcinoma = 2.
Figure 2Representative chromatogram of urine sample from a control subject (CTRL) and a LC patient. AU—arbitrary units.
Figure 3Distribution of the uVOMs identified in control (CTRL) and lung cancer (LC) individuals by chemical families. Legend: Alc—alcohols; Ald—aldehydes; AU—arbitrary units; BD—benzene derivatives; Est—esters; FA—fatty acids; Fu—furans; HC—hydrocarbons; Kt—ketones; ND—naphthalene derivatives; Ot—others; Os—organosulfurs; Ph—phenols; TD—terpenic derivatives.
Figure 4Profile of the two first principal components (PC1 vs. PC2) for the most significative uVOMs identified in this work.
Most important variables identified using the different classification algorithms.
| Label a | Volatiles | CFS | F-Score | F-Score | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVM | RF | ||||
| 3 b | Furan | X | X | X | X |
| 46 | o-Cymene | X | X | X | X |
| 64 | p-Cymenene | X | X | ||
| 78 | Acetic acid | X | |||
| 79 | Furfural | X | X | X | |
| 81 | Linalool oxide | X | X | X | X |
| 83 | 2,6-Dimethyl-7-octen-2-ol | X | |||
| 132 | Viridiflorene | X | X | X | X |
| 133 | β-Guaiene | X | |||
| 149 | 3,6-dimethyl-1H-indazole | X | |||
| 152 | 1-(3,5-Bis-trifluoromethylphenyl)ethanol | X | |||
| 153 | Benzoyl isocyanate | X | X | ||
| 158 | 1,2,3,3-Tetramethyl-cyclopenten-4-one | X | X | ||
| 162 | methoxy-phenyl-oxime | X | |||
| 164 | 4-(1-Methylethyl)-benzaldehyde | X | |||
| 165 | 2,4,6-Trimethylbenzyl alcohol | X | X | ||
| 177 | 2-Methyl-1-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-methyl-1,3-propanediyl ester propanoic acid | X | X | ||
| 179 | α-Calacorene | X | X | ||
| 184 | 2-Bromo-phenol | X | X | X | X |
| 187 | 4-(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohexa-1,3-dienyl)but-3-en-2-one | X | X | ||
| 188 | Phenol | ||||
| 190 | Tricyclazole | X | X | X | X |
| 191 | 3,8-Dimethyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-1,2-naphthalenedione | X | |||
| 195 | p-Cresol | X | X | X | X |
| 198 | 4,4,5,8-Tetramethyl-4H-1-benzopyran | X | |||
| 200 | Indanone | X | X | ||
| 201 | Nonanoic acid | X | |||
| 203 | 2-[(2-ethoxy-3,4-dimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-ylidene)methyl]-furan | X | |||
| 207 | 2-Bromo-4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-phenol | X | X | ||
| 208 | muurolane | X | X | ||
| 212 | 2,3-Dihydro-3,3,4,5-pentamethyl-1H-inden-1-one | X | X | ||
| 216 | 1-(4-Hydroxy-3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methyl-3-morpholinopropan-1-one | X | X | X | X |
| 219 | Dodecanoic acid | X |
a Number of identified uVOM, listed in Table S1 (Supplementary Material); b uVOMs indicated in bold were simultaneously reported as the most important using the different CFS and F-score upon SVM, allowing the discrimination of the target groups with 100% accuracy using SVM and MLP.
Figure 5Boxplots of the most important variables (uVOMS) for the discrimination of LC patients from control subjects (CTRL). Legend: AU—arbitrary units; CTRL—control group; LC—lung cancer; X3—furan; X46—o-cymene; X79—furfural; X81—linalool oxide; X132—viridiflorene; X184—2-bromophenol; X190—tricyclazole; X195—p-cresol; X216—1-(4-hydroxy-3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methyl-3-morpholinopropan-1-one.
Figure 6Metabolic pathway analysis showing dysregulated metabolic pathways in LC patients. Pathway impact reflects the importance (cumulative percentage of the matched metabolite nodes) that the statistically significant uVOMs identified in this work (as assessed by log p values) have in the different metabolic pathways.
Figure 7Boxplots of the variations found for the most relevant metabolites identified in the pathway topology analysis. CTRL—control subjects, LC—lung cancer patients.