R P Arasaradnam1, J A Covington, C Harmston, C U Nwokolo. 1. Clinical Sciences Research Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The detection of airborne gas phase biomarkers that emanate from biological samples like urine, breath and faeces may herald a new age of non-invasive diagnostics. These biomarkers may reflect status in health and disease and can be detected by humans and other animals, to some extent, but far more consistently with instruments. The continued advancement in micro and nanotechnology has produced a range of compact and sophisticated gas analysis sensors and sensor systems, focussed primarily towards environmental and security applications. These instruments are now increasingly adapted for use in clinical testing and with the discovery of new gas volatile compound biomarkers, lead naturally to a new era of non-invasive diagnostics. AIM: To review current sensor instruments like the electronic nose (e-nose) and ion mobility spectroscopy (IMS), existing technology like gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) and their application in the detection of gas phase volatile compound biomarkers in medicine - focussing on gastroenterology. METHODS: A systematic search on Medline and Pubmed databases was performed to identify articles relevant to gas and volatile organic compounds. RESULTS: E-nose and IMS instruments achieve sensitivities and specificities ranging from 75 to 92% in differentiating between inflammatory bowel disease, bile acid diarrhoea and colon cancer from controls. For pulmonary disease, the sensitivities and specificities exceed 90% in differentiating between pulmonary malignancy, pneumonia and obstructive airways disease. These sensitivity levels also hold true for diabetes (92%) and bladder cancer (90%) when GC-MS is combined with an e-nose. CONCLUSIONS: The accurate reproducible sensing of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using portable near-patient devices is a goal within reach for today's clinicians.
BACKGROUND: The detection of airborne gas phase biomarkers that emanate from biological samples like urine, breath and faeces may herald a new age of non-invasive diagnostics. These biomarkers may reflect status in health and disease and can be detected by humans and other animals, to some extent, but far more consistently with instruments. The continued advancement in micro and nanotechnology has produced a range of compact and sophisticated gas analysis sensors and sensor systems, focussed primarily towards environmental and security applications. These instruments are now increasingly adapted for use in clinical testing and with the discovery of new gas volatile compound biomarkers, lead naturally to a new era of non-invasive diagnostics. AIM: To review current sensor instruments like the electronic nose (e-nose) and ion mobility spectroscopy (IMS), existing technology like gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) and their application in the detection of gas phase volatile compound biomarkers in medicine - focussing on gastroenterology. METHODS: A systematic search on Medline and Pubmed databases was performed to identify articles relevant to gas and volatile organic compounds. RESULTS: E-nose and IMS instruments achieve sensitivities and specificities ranging from 75 to 92% in differentiating between inflammatory bowel disease, bile aciddiarrhoea and colon cancer from controls. For pulmonary disease, the sensitivities and specificities exceed 90% in differentiating between pulmonary malignancy, pneumonia and obstructive airways disease. These sensitivity levels also hold true for diabetes (92%) and bladder cancer (90%) when GC-MS is combined with an e-nose. CONCLUSIONS: The accurate reproducible sensing of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using portable near-patient devices is a goal within reach for today's clinicians.
Authors: N Patel; N Alkhouri; K Eng; F Cikach; L Mahajan; C Yan; D Grove; E S Rome; R Lopez; R A Dweik Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Jussi Virtanen; Lauri Hokkinen; Markus Karjalainen; Anton Kontunen; Risto Vuento; Jura Numminen; Markus Rautiainen; Niku Oksala; Antti Roine; Ilkka Kivekäs Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Ann Muls; Jervoise Andreyev; Susan Lalondrelle; Alexandra Taylor; Christine Norton; Ailsa Hart Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Ramesh P Arasaradnam; Eric Westenbrink; Michael J McFarlane; Ruth Harbord; Samantha Chambers; Nicola O'Connell; Catherine Bailey; Chuka U Nwokolo; Karna D Bardhan; Richard Savage; James A Covington Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ramesh P Arasaradnam; Michael J McFarlane; Courtenay Ryan-Fisher; Erik Westenbrink; Phoebe Hodges; Paula Hodges; Matthew G Thomas; Samantha Chambers; Nicola O'Connell; Catherine Bailey; Christopher Harmston; Chuka U Nwokolo; Karna D Bardhan; James A Covington Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 3.240