| Literature DB >> 35050019 |
Joana Terra-Matos1, Marta Oliveira Teixeira1,2, Cátia Santos-Pereira1,3, Henrique Noronha1,4, Lucília Domingues3, Carmen Sieiro5, Hernâni Gerós1,3,4, Susana Rodrigues Chaves1, Maria João Sousa1, Manuela Côrte-Real1.
Abstract
Yeast-based bioethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates (LH) is an attractive and sustainable alternative for biofuel production. However, the presence of acetic acid (AA) in LH is still a major problem. Indeed, above certain concentrations, AA inhibits yeast fermentation and triggers a regulated cell death (RCD) process mediated by the mitochondria and vacuole. Understanding the mechanisms involved in AA-induced RCD (AA-RCD) may thus help select robust fermentative yeast strains, providing novel insights to improve lignocellulosic ethanol (LE) production. Herein, we hypothesized that zinc vacuolar transporters are involved in vacuole-mediated AA-RCD, since zinc enhances ethanol production and zinc-dependent catalase and superoxide dismutase protect from AA-RCD. In this work, zinc limitation sensitized wild-type cells to AA-RCD, while zinc supplementation resulted in a small protective effect. Cells lacking the vacuolar zinc transporter Zrt3 were highly resistant to AA-RCD, exhibiting reduced vacuolar dysfunction. Moreover, zrt3Δ cells displayed higher ethanol productivity than their wild-type counterparts, both when cultivated in rich medium with AA (0.29 g L-1 h-1 versus 0.11 g L-1 h-1) and in an LH (0.73 g L-1 h-1 versus 0.55 g L-1 h-1). Overall, the deletion of ZRT3 emerges as a promising strategy to increase strain robustness in LE industrial production.Entities:
Keywords: Saccharomyces cerevisiae; acetic acid; lignocellulosic ethanol; lignocellulosic hydrolysates; vacuolar zinc transporter
Year: 2022 PMID: 35050019 PMCID: PMC8779672 DOI: 10.3390/jof8010078
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Recent studies on the application of engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains towards improved tolerance to inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Adapted from [6], with permission of Springer Nature, 2022.
| Modifications | Lignocellulosic Hydrolysate | Outcomes | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D452-2 (MATα, leu2, his3, ura3, and can1) | Expression of the | Acetic acid consumption and faster xylose consumption; higher ethanol production and lower glycerol and xylitol production | [ | |
| BY4741 (MATa, his3Δ1, leu2Δ0, met15Δ0, ura3Δ0) | Overexpression of | Sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate (0.89 furfural, 0.11 HMF,1.4 acetic acid, 0.03 formic acid and 0.05 levulinic acid); spruce hydrolysate (0.36 furfural, 0.03 HMF, 0.72 acetic acid, 0.27 formic acid, and 0.12 levulinic acid) | Increased relative growth rates | [ |
| D452-2 (MATα, leu2, his3, ura3, and can1) | Overexpression of | Corn stover hydrolysate (3.3 acetic acid, 0.8 HMF, and 0.4 furfural) | Improved ethanol productivity | [ |
| Haploid derivative of ATCC 4124 strain | Expression of the | Higher ethanol productivity and lower by-product yield | [ | |
| D452-2 (MATα, leu2, his3, ura3, and can1) | Overexpression of | Greater robustness towards toxic hydrolysate; increased xylose consumption rate, inhibitor tolerance and ethanol production | [ | |
| BY4742 (MATa, his3Δ1, leu2Δ0, lys2Δ0, ura3Δ0) | Overexpression of | Diluted bagasse hydrolysate (44 glucose, 5.8 xylose, 4.1 acetic acid, 0.6 furfural, and 0.2 HMF) | Larger ethanol production in titter, yield, and productivity; increased levels of protectant metabolites (trehalose, fatty acids, GABA and putrescine) | [ |
| PE-2 (NCYC 3233) | Overexpression of | Paulownia hydrolysate (5.84 acetic acid, 1.96 furfural, and 0.72 HMF) | Improved yeast adaptation to non-detoxified hydrolysate with high acetic acid content; increased yeast cell wall robustness under acetic acid stress situations | [ |
| XUSAE57 | Overexpression of | Sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate(34 glucose, 32 xylose, 3.1 acetic acid, 0.7 phenolics) | Improved xylose utilization and higher ethanol yield | [ |
Figure 1Cell survival of wild-type and zrt3Δ cells after AA treatment. Cell survival was assessed by c.f.u. 120 min after treatment with 100 mM AA, pH 3.0. Values are mean ± SEM (n ≥ 3). Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA. ** p < 0.01 in comparison with the wild-type strain.
Figure 2The effect of AA on superoxide anion accumulation and Sod1 and catalase enzymatic activities in wild-type and zrt3Δ cells. (a) Cellular and mitochondrial superoxide anion accumulation in S. cerevisiae BY4741 wild-type and zrt3Δ strains 60 min after incubation with AA (100 mM), pH 3.0 or in the absence of AA. Values represent the percentage of cells with positive DHE and Mitosox staining and are the mean ± SEM (n = 2). Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA. * p < 0.05, **** p ˂ 0.0001 in comparison with the wild-type strain. (b) To evaluate Sod1 activity in WT and zrt3Δ mutant 60 min after incubation with AA (75 mM) or in the absence of AA, protein extracts were run on native polyacrylamide gels (15%) and stained with NBT and Coomassie blue. Two different concentrations of each condition (20 and 60 µg) are shown. As a Sod1 control, the sod1Δ mutant was used. Representative gels of these assays are shown. (c) To measure enzymatic activity, the intensity of gel bands from (b) was quantified using Image J software. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. Non-significant values are represented as ns. (d) Determination of activity of catalases was estimated by measuring oxygen consumption with a Clark electrode. Activity of catalases was evaluated in 3 replicates of the same sample using 0.75 mM H2O2. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA * p < 0.05, in comparison with the wild-type strain. # p < 0.05 in comparison with the control.
Figure 3The effect of AA on Pep4-mCherry translocation from the vacuole into the cytosol, vacuolar membrane permeabilization and vacuolar pH in S. cerevisiae wild-type and zrt3Δ strains treated with AA. (a) Representative fluorescence microscopy images of wild-type and zrt3Δ cells transformed with Pep4-mCherry. Cells were incubated up to 120 min with or without AA and then stained with 2 µM CMAC to assess vacuole membrane integrity. Cells were observed under the fluorescence microscope with a 100× oil immersion objective. (b) Quantification of Pep4-mCherry localization and cells displaying VMP. At least 300 cells were counted for each condition. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA. **** p < 0.0001 in comparison with AA-treated wild-type cells. (c) Quantification of CDCF median fluorescence intensity of S. cerevisiae BY4741 wild-type and zrt3Δ cells 60 min after AA treatment (100 mM), pH 3.0. Cells were stained with 1.6 µM CDCFDA and analyzed by flow cytometry. Values are the median ± SEM (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA. ## p < 0.01 in comparison with the control of wild-type cells; ** p < 0.01 in comparison with the AA-treated wild-type strain.
Figure 4Effect of zinc supplementation (a) or limitation (b) on AA-induced cell death and cellular superoxide anion accumulation (c,d) in S. cerevisiae BY4741 wild-type cells. (a) Cells were treated with 10 mM ZnSO4, 100 mM AA or co-treated with both for 60 min. (b) Cells were pre-treated with and without 1 mM EDTA for 30 min and next treated with 1 mM of EDTA, 75 mM of AA or co-treated with both for 90 min. Cell survival was assessed by c.f.u. counting. (c) Quantification of the percentage of DHE-positive stained cells after supplementation with 10 mM ZnSO4, 100 mM AA or both for 60 min. (d) Quantification of the percentage of cells with DHE-positive staining after pre-treatment with and without 1 mM EDTA for 30 min, followed by treatment with 1 mM of EDTA, 75 mM of AA or both for 90 min. Values are percentages of DHE-positive cells ± SEM of three (a,b), five (c) and three (d) independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p ˂ 0.0001 in comparison with the control, or between indicated conditions. Non-significant values are represented as ns.
Figure 5Effect of AA on cell growth and ethanol production of S. cerevisiae BY4741 wild-type and zrt3Δ strains. (a) Cell growth in YEPD medium with 60 mM AA at pH 4.5. Insert: values of the lag phase duration, determined by the time required to double the initial optical density. (b) Glucose and ethanol concentrations at the end of the growth experiment (32 h). The values are the mean ±SEM (n = 2). Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA. * p < 0.05, **** p ˂ 0.0001 comparing the indicated conditions.
Figure 6Cell growth, glucose consumption and ethanol production by S. cerevisiae BY4741 wild-type and zrt3Δ strains on a lignocellulosic hydrolysate. (a) Cell growth in a lignocellulosic hydrolysate at pH 4.5 was assessed by measuring optical density along 30 h. (b) Glucose and ethanol concentrations were measured 12 h after inoculation, after the zrt3Δ strain reached stationary phase. Values are the mean ± SEM (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA. ** p ˂ 0.01, **** p ˂ 0.0001 in comparison with the indicated conditions.