| Literature DB >> 35049782 |
Violeta Razmaitė1, Artūras Šiukščius1, Rūta Šveistienė1, Virginija Jatkauskienė1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to identify the conservation status of Lithuanian local Vištinės goose breed and evaluate the carcass and meat quality characteristics in the breast and thigh depending on the sex. The status of the Lithuanian Vištinės goose breed was evaluated by monitoring of the birds, which are included in the breeding system. Twenty geese from the nucleus flock at the age of 10 weeks and reared using a commercial concentrate diet ad libitum were used for the carcass and meat quality evaluation. Due to fluctuations in the numbers of geese and reproduction of purebred birds on a largest scale from the nucleus flock, the status of Vištinės goose population remains critical-maintained. The difference in the live body weight between males and females was insignificant, whereas males showed higher carcass weight (p < 0.05), including the weight of breast, wings, thighs and neck. The sex did not affect the meat quality parameters, but the anatomical location of muscles has appeared to show a high effect. Thigh muscles had lower (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively) protein and cholesterol, and higher (p < 0.001) intramuscular fat contents compared with the breast. Thigh muscles also showed higher (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively) pH and EZ drip loss, but lower (p < 0.001) cooking loss compared with the breast. The breast was characterized by a higher (p < 0.001) shear of force and toughness with Warner-Bratzler test and higher (p < 0.001) hardness detected by texture profile analysis (TPA) compared with the thigh. Breast lipids had higher (p < 0.001) proportion of total saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids, whereas the thigh was characterized by a higher proportion of monounsaturated fatty acids. Atherogenic (AI) and thrombogenic (TI) indexes were higher (p < 0.001) and hypocholesterolemic/hypercholesterolemic (h/H) ratio was lower (p < 0.001) and less favourable in the breast compared with the thigh. Despite the muscle type differences, goose meat of the local conserved breed exhibited good quality and expected enhancing impact on consumer health.Entities:
Keywords: fatty acids; goose; lipid indices; local breed; meat; quality properties
Year: 2022 PMID: 35049782 PMCID: PMC8772542 DOI: 10.3390/ani12020159
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Figure 1Goose of Vištinės breed. Picture made by Linas Petraška.
Nutrient composition of feed.
| Components | Age of Goslings in Weeks | |
|---|---|---|
| 1–3 | 4–10 | |
| Crude protein, % | 20 | 18 |
| Crude fat, % | 3.61 | 3.46 |
| Crude fiber, % | 3.69 | 4.05 |
| Ash, % | 5.95 | 6.99 |
| Calcium, % | 1.00 | 1.50 |
| Phosphorus, % | 0.67 | 0.68 |
| Sodium, % | 0.16 | 0.15 |
| Lysine, % | 1.00 | 0.90 |
| Methionine, % | 0.42 | 0.45 |
| ME, kcal | 2862 | 2800 |
ME-metabolizable energy.
Figure 2Vištinės geese numbers from 2004 to 2020.
Figure 3Distribution of farms rearing Vištinės goose breed and density of birds (Data from Animal breeding portal. Available in Lithuanian at https://www.vic.lt/veislininkyste/zemelapiai/ accessed on 1 September 2021).
Body composition of Vištinės geese.
| Variables | Sex | SED | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||||
| Live body weight, g | 4883 | 4507 | 282.38 | 0.199 | |
| Eviscerated warm carcass, g | 4138 | 3660 | 196.34 | 0.025 | |
| Dressing percentage, % | 75.9 | 75.8 | 2.38 | 0.960 | |
| Weight and proportion in body | Head, g | 174.0 | 149.8 | 8.41 | 0.010 |
| % | 3.57 | 3.38 | 0.233 | 0.425 | |
| Legs, g | 131 | 111 | 6.99 | 0.013 | |
| % | 2.68 | 2.51 | 0.160 | 0.288 | |
| Gut, g | 227 | 205 | 15.85 | 0.173 | |
| % | 4.66 | 4.58 | 0.28 | 0.784 | |
| Gizzard, g | 215 | 191 | 14.26 | 0.100 | |
| % | 4.43 | 4.33 | 0.43 | 0.818 | |
| Empty gizzard, g | 199 | 167 | 9.94 | 0.004 | |
| % | 4.09 | 3.74 | 0.20 | 0.103 | |
| Liver, g | 77.1 | 67.2 | 4.10 | 0.026 | |
| % | 1.59 | 1.50 | 0.07 | 0.207 | |
| Heart, g | 33.0 | 32.1 | 2.57 | 0.730 | |
| % | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.05 | 0.454 | |
| Abdominal fat, g | 81.0 | 76.3 | 13.66 | 0.732 | |
| % | 1.65 | 1.69 | 0.28 | 0.878 | |
p values of GLM LSD test for sex were significantly different at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01; SED-standard error of difference.
Carcass composition of Vištinės geese.
| Sex | Cold Carcass Weight | Weight and Proportion in Carcass | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breast | Thighs | Wings | Neck | Back | |||||||
| g | g | % | g | % | g | % | g | % | g | % | |
| Male | 3442 | 838 | 25.2 | 717 | 21.6 | 545 | 16.3 | 299 | 8.9 | 847 | 25.4 |
| Female | 2996 | 767 | 24.9 | 658 | 21.5 | 495 | 16.1 | 254 | 8.3 | 801 | 26.1 |
| SED | 164.85 | 32.81 | 0.69 | 20.19 | 0.47 | 19.91 | 0.33 | 12.76 | 0.51 | 47.29 | 0.92 |
| 0.014 | 0.046 | 0.774 | 0.009 | 0.931 | 0.021 | 0.512 | 0.002 | 0.198 | 0.354 | 0.429 | |
p values of GLM LSD test for sex were significantly different at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01; SED-standard error of difference.
Effects of muscle anatomical location and sex on proximate composition of goose meat.
| Variables | Muscle | Sex | SED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breast ( | Thigh ( | Male ( | Female ( | Muscle | Sex | ||
| Dry matter, % | 27.30 | 27.41 | 27.04 | 27.68 | 0.429 | 0.798 | 0.142 |
| Protein, % | 22.70 | 21.67 | 21.87 | 22.50 | 0.340 | 0.005 | 0.073 |
| Fat, % | 3.58 | 5.25 | 4.27 | 4.56 | 0.298 | 0.000 | 0.329 |
| Ash, % | 0.97 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.039 | 0.000 | 0.846 |
| Cholesterol, mg/100 g | 70.66 | 45.49 | 58.82 | 57.33 | 3.500 | 0.000 | 0.673 |
p values of GLM LSD test for muscle type were significantly different at p < 0.01, p < 0.001 and p-values of 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10 for sex would be considered as trend; SED-standard error of difference.
Effects of muscle anatomical location and sex on meat quality parameters of Lithuanian Vištinės geese.
| Variables | Muscle | Sex | SED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breast ( | Thigh ( | Male ( | Female ( | Muscle | Sex | ||
| pH | 5.76 | 6.51 | 6.14 | 6.13 | 0.053 | 0.000 | 0.917 |
| Colour L* | 40.58 | 38.42 | 39.72 | 39.28 | 1.142 | 0.066 | 0.076 |
| a* | 16.85 | 16.82 | 16.71 | 16.96 | 0.453 | 0.953 | 0.586 |
| b* | 4.74 | 4.69 | 4.53 | 4.90 | 0.783 | 0.946 | 0.633 |
| C | 17.23 | 17.36 | 17.16 | 17.43 | 0.480 | 0.789 | 0.580 |
| h | 12.68 | 14.56 | 13.25 | 13.99 | 1.083 | 0.090 | 0.503 |
| EZ Drip loss, % | 0.84 | 1.34 | 0.98 | 1.20 | 0.182 | 0.010 | 0.244 |
| Cooking loss, % | 38.05 | 31.52 | 35.29 | 34.28 | 0.652 | 0.000 | 0.132 |
p values of GLM LSD tests for muscle type were significantly different at p < 0.01, p < 0.001 and p-values of 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10 for muscle type and sex would be considered as trends; SED-standard error of difference; lightness (L*); redness (a*); yellowness (b*).
Effects of muscle anatomical location and goose sex on Warner-Bratzler test parameters.
| Variables | Muscle | Sex | SED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breast | Thigh | Male | Female | Muscle | Sex | ||
| Shear of force, N | 2.20 | 1.62 | 1.92 | 1.90 | 0.147 | 0.000 | 0.862 |
| Toughness, N | 124.80 | 88.87 | 114.48 | 99.18 | 10.664 | 0.001 | 0.157 |
p values of GLM LSD test for muscle type were significantly different at p < 0.001; SED-standard error of difference.
Effects of muscle anatomical location and goose sex on parameters of texture profile analysis.
| Variables | Muscle | Sex | SED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breast | Thigh | Male | Female | Muscle | Sex | ||
| Cohesiveness | 2.24 | 2.41 | 2.25 | 2.40 | 0.061 | 0.008 | 0.020 |
| Guminess, N | 22.91 | 12.35 | 17.96 | 17.30 | 1.517 | 0.000 | 0.667 |
| Hardness, N | 50.95 | 29.44 | 39.51 | 40.88 | 3.399 | 0.000 | 0.689 |
| Springiness | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.003 | 0.009 | 0.148 |
| Chewiness, N | 19.86 | 10.61 | 15.56 | 14.92 | 1.338 | 0.000 | 0.636 |
p values of GLM LSD test for muscle type and sex were significantly different at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001; SED-standard error of difference.
Effects of muscle anatomical location and sex on saturated fatty acid (% of total FA) composition of goose meat lipids.
| Fatty Acids | Location | Sex | SED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breast | Thigh | Male | Female | Location | Sex | ||
| C12:0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.002 | 0.416 | 0.771 |
| C14:0 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.016 | 0.236 | 0.769 |
| C15:0 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.002 | 0.096 | 0.878 |
| C16:0 | 20.41 | 19.07 | 19.87 | 19.61 | 0.386 | 0.001 | 0.506 |
| C17:0 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.008 | 0.813 | 0.739 |
| C18:0 | 6.37 | 5.18 | 5.77 | 5.78 | 0.210 | 0.000 | 0.957 |
| C20:0 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.004 | 0.066 | 0.230 |
| C22:0 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.013 | 0.000 | 0.247 |
| SFA | 27.44 | 24.81 | 26.26 | 25.99 | 0.461 | 0.000 | 0.561 |
p values of GLM LSD test for muscle type were significantly different at p < 0.001 and p-values of 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10 would be considered as trends; SED-standard error of difference.
Effects of muscle anatomical location and sex on monounsaturated fatty acid (% of total FA) composition of goose meat lipids.
| Fatty Acids | Location | Sex | SED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breast | Thigh | Male | Female | Location | Sex | ||
| C14:1n-7 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.007 | 0.123 | 0.106 |
| C16:1n-9t | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.003 | 0.206 | 0.635 |
| C16:1n-9 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.015 | 0.083 | 0.687 |
| C16:1n-7 | 2.76 | 3.24 | 2.96 | 3.04 | 0.122 | 0.000 | 0.511 |
| C17:1n-9 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.024 | 0.005 | 0.845 |
| C18:1n-9t | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.007 | 0.289 | 0.709 |
| C18:1n-9 | 43.75 | 50.39 | 46.64 | 47.49 | 0.991 | 0.000 | 0.398 |
| C18:1n-7 | 2.67 | 1.91 | 2.42 | 2.16 | 0.099 | 0.000 | 0.011 |
| C20:1n-9 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.011 | 0.000 | 0.564 |
| C22:1n-9 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.002 | 0.093 | 0.347 |
| MUFA | 50.14 | 56.60 | 53.05 | 53.69 | 0.937 | 0.000 | 0.494 |
p values of GLM LSD test for muscle type and sex were significantly different at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 and p-values of 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10 would be considered as trends; SED-standard error of difference.
Effects of muscle anatomical location and sex on polyunsaturated fatty acid (% of total FA) composition of goose meat lipids.
| Fatty Acids | Location | Sex | SED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breast | Thigh | Male | Female | Location | Sex | ||
| C18:2 n-6t | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.005 | 0.243 | 0.830 |
| C18:2 n-6 | 13.75 | 13.65 | 13.53 | 13.88 | 0.343 | 0.770 | 0.323 |
| C18:3 n-6 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.557 |
| C18:3 n-3 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.034 | 0.835 | 0.836 |
| C20:2 n-6 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.443 |
| C20:3 n-6 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 0.625 |
| C20:3 n-3 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.280 |
| C20:4 n-6 | 3.65 | 1.70 | 2.86 | 2.49 | 0.283 | 0.000 | 0.200 |
| C20:5 n-3 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.005 | 0.000 | 0.409 |
| C22:2 n-6 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.003 | 0.336 | 0.054 |
| C22:4 n-6 | 0.58 | 0.35 | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.043 | 0.000 | 0.127 |
| C22:5 n-3 | 0.24 | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.17 | 0.016 | 0.000 | 0.086 |
| C22:6 n-3 | 0.28 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.025 | 0.000 | 0.167 |
| PUFA | 19.91 | 17.29 | 18.67 | 18.53 | 0.554 | 0.000 | 0.793 |
p values of GLM LSD test for muscle type were significantly different at p < 0.01, p < 0.001 and p-values of 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10 for sex would be considered as trends; SED-standard error of difference.
Total trans fatty acids and fatty acid ratios and lipid quality indexes in intramuscular fat of goose meat.
| Variables | Location | Sex | SED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breast | Thigh | Male | Female | Location | Sex | ||
| TFA | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.010 | 0.362 | 0.992 |
| PUFA/SFA | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.022 | 0.215 | 0.994 |
| n-6/n-3 | 11.38 | 11.79 | 11.45 | 11.71 | 0.226 | 0.074 | 0.257 |
| AI | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 0.392 |
| TI | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.015 | 0.000 | 0.602 |
| h/H | 3.21 | 3.61 | 3.38 | 3.44 | 0.094 | 0.000 | 0.533 |
| PI | 38.56 | 27.76 | 34.08 | 32.25 | 1.668 | 0.000 | 0.279 |
| UFA | 2.51 | 1.31 | 2.02 | 1.79 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 0.256 |
p values of GLM LSD test for muscle type were significantly different at p < 0.001 and p-values of 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10 would be considered as trends; SED-standard error of difference; TFA-sum of all identified trans fatty acids; PUFA/SFA-ratio of ΣPUFA to ΣSFA, n-6/n-3-ratio of Σn-6 PUFA to Σn-3 PUFA, AI-atherogenic index, TI-thrombogenic index, h/H-hypocholesterolemic/hypercholesterolemic ratio, PI-peroxidizability index. UFA-sum of unidentified fatty acids and their isomers.